Julia A Townsend1, James E Keener1, Zachary M Miller2, James S Prell2,3, Michael T Marty1. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of Arizona , Tucson , Arizona 85721 , United States. 2. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of Oregon , Eugene , Oregon 97403 , United States. 3. Materials Science Institute , University of Oregon , Eugene , Oregon 97403 , United States.
Abstract
Noncovalent interactions between biomolecules are critical to their activity. Native mass spectrometry (MS) has enabled characterization of these interactions by preserving noncovalent assemblies for mass analysis, including protein-ligand and protein-protein complexes for a wide range of soluble and membrane proteins. Recent advances in native MS of lipoprotein nanodiscs have also allowed characterization of antimicrobial peptides and membrane proteins embedded in intact lipid bilayers. However, conventional native electrospray ionization (ESI) can disrupt labile interactions. To stabilize macromolecular complexes for native MS, charge reducing reagents can be added to the solution prior to ESI, such as triethylamine, trimethylamine oxide, and imidazole. Lowering the charge acquired during ESI reduces Coulombic repulsion that leads to dissociation, and charge reduction reagents may also lower the internal energy of the ions through evaporative cooling. Here, we tested a range of imidazole derivatives to discover improved charge reducing reagents and to determine how their chemical properties influence charge reduction efficacy. We measured their effects on a soluble protein complex, a membrane protein complex in detergent, and lipoprotein nanodiscs with and without embedded peptides, and used computational chemistry to understand the observed charge-reduction behavior. Together, our data revealed that hydrophobic substituents at the 2 position on imidazole can significantly improve both charge reduction and gas-phase stability over existing reagents. These new imidazole derivatives will be immediately beneficial for a range of native MS applications and provide chemical principles to guide development of novel charge reducing reagents.
Noncovalent interactions between biomolecules are critical to their activity. Native mass spectrometry (MS) has enabled characterization of these interactions by preserving noncovalent assemblies for mass analysis, including protein-ligand and protein-protein complexes for a wide range of soluble and n class="Gene">membrane proteins. Recent advances in native MS of lipoprotein nanodiscs have also allowed characterization of antimicrobial peptides and membrane proteins embedded in intact lipid bilayers. However, conventional native electrospray ionization (ESI) can disrupt labile interactions. To stabilize macromolecular complexes for native MS, charge reducing reagents can be added to the solution prior to ESI, such as triethylamine, trimethylamine oxide, and imidazole. Lowering the charge acquired during ESI reduces Coulombic repulsion that leads to dissociation, and charge reduction reagents may also lower the internal energy of the ions through evaporative cooling. Here, we tested a range of imidazole derivatives to discover improved charge reducing reagents and to determine how their chemical properties influence charge reduction efficacy. We measured their effects on a soluble protein complex, a membrane protein complex in detergent, and lipoprotein nanodiscs with and without embedded peptides, and used computational chemistry to understand the observed charge-reduction behavior. Together, our data revealed that hydrophobic substituents at the 2 position on imidazole can significantly improve both charge reduction and gas-phase stability over existing reagents. These new imidazole derivatives will be immediately beneficial for a range of native MS applications and provide chemical principles to guide development of novel charge reducing reagents.
Authors: Dhanashri Bagal; Elena N Kitova; Lan Liu; Amr El-Hawiet; Paul D Schnier; John S Klassen Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Joseph Gault; Danai Lianoudaki; Margit Kaldmäe; Nina Kronqvist; Anna Rising; Jan Johansson; Bernhard Lohkamp; Sonia Laín; Timothy M Allison; David P Lane; Erik G Marklund; Michael Landreh Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: T K Ritchie; Y V Grinkova; T H Bayburt; I G Denisov; J K Zolnerciks; W M Atkins; S G Sligar Journal: Methods Enzymol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: Margit Kaldmäe; Nicklas Österlund; Danai Lianoudaki; Cagla Sahin; Peter Bergman; Tomas Nyman; Nina Kronqvist; Leopold L Ilag; Timothy M Allison; Erik G Marklund; Michael Landreh Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Julia A Townsend; Henry M Sanders; Amber D Rolland; Chad K Park; Nancy C Horton; James S Prell; Jun Wang; Michael T Marty Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Jixing Lyu; Yang Liu; Jacob W McCabe; Samantha Schrecke; Lei Fang; David H Russell; Arthur Laganowsky Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: John T Petroff; Ailing Tong; Lawrence J Chen; Gregory T Dekoster; Farha Khan; Jeff Abramson; Carl Frieden; Wayland W L Cheng Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Yong Zi Tan; José Rodrigues; James E Keener; Ruixiang Blake Zheng; Richard Brunton; Brian Kloss; Sabrina I Giacometti; Ana L Rosário; Lei Zhang; Michael Niederweis; Oliver B Clarke; Todd L Lowary; Michael T Marty; Margarida Archer; Clinton S Potter; Bridget Carragher; Filippo Mancia Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Rosemary J Cater; Geok Lin Chua; Satchal K Erramilli; James E Keener; Brendon C Choy; Piotr Tokarz; Cheen Fei Chin; Debra Q Y Quek; Brian Kloss; Joseph G Pepe; Giacomo Parisi; Bernice H Wong; Oliver B Clarke; Michael T Marty; Anthony A Kossiakoff; George Khelashvili; David L Silver; Filippo Mancia Journal: Nature Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 49.962