Lee Chien Yap1, Thomas Hugh Lynch2,3, Rustom P Manecksha2,3,4. 1. Department of Urology, St. James's Hospital, James Street, Dublin, 8, Ireland. leechienyap@rcsi.ie. 2. Department of Urology, St. James's Hospital, James Street, Dublin, 8, Ireland. 3. Department of Surgery, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin, 24, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence to implement multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for biopsy-naive men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa). This will reduce the number of unnecessary trans rectal ultrasound biopsies (TRUS-Bx) performed and reduce the number of indolent cancers diagnosed. AIMS: To assess current clinical practices for investigating clinically suspected prostate cancer in Ireland and determine if private health insurance providers are offering mpMRI scans in biopsy-naive men. METHODS: Each health insurance provider procedure code was reviewed. The indications and requirements for prostate mpMRI in the setting of diagnosis, staging, surveillance, and recurrence were assessed for each health care provider. Current practices adopted by accredited referral clinics for suspected prostate cancer were reviewed. RESULTS: Two of the three leading health insurance providers, which between them cover 46% of the private health insurance market in Ireland, provide pre-biopsy mpMRI cover as of April 2019. This leaves almost half of those insured with no accessibility to pre-biopsy mpMRI. This is in contrast to the majority of public NCCP hospitals that offer pre-biopsy mpMRI for clinically suspected prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-biopsy mpMRI for clinically suspected prostate cancer is emerging as a standard of practice in Ireland. International guidelines are also changing to reflect latest clinical trial evidence. Private health insurance providers should amend their policies to reflect current clinical practices already adopted in the public sector.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence to implement multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for biopsy-naive men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa). This will reduce the number of unnecessary trans rectal ultrasound biopsies (TRUS-Bx) performed and reduce the number of indolent cancers diagnosed. AIMS: To assess current clinical practices for investigating clinically suspected prostate cancer in Ireland and determine if private health insurance providers are offering mpMRI scans in biopsy-naive men. METHODS: Each health insurance provider procedure code was reviewed. The indications and requirements for prostate mpMRI in the setting of diagnosis, staging, surveillance, and recurrence were assessed for each health care provider. Current practices adopted by accredited referral clinics for suspected prostate cancer were reviewed. RESULTS: Two of the three leading health insurance providers, which between them cover 46% of the private health insurance market in Ireland, provide pre-biopsy mpMRI cover as of April 2019. This leaves almost half of those insured with no accessibility to pre-biopsy mpMRI. This is in contrast to the majority of public NCCP hospitals that offer pre-biopsy mpMRI for clinically suspected prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-biopsy mpMRI for clinically suspected prostate cancer is emerging as a standard of practice in Ireland. International guidelines are also changing to reflect latest clinical trial evidence. Private health insurance providers should amend their policies to reflect current clinical practices already adopted in the public sector.
Entities:
Keywords:
Insurance; Prostate cancer; Trans rectal ultrasound biopsies; mpMRI
Authors: Timothy J Wilt; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler; William J Aronson; Michael K Brawer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert K Nam; Refik Saskin; Yuna Lee; Ying Liu; Calvin Law; Laurence H Klotz; D Andrew Loblaw; John Trachtenberg; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Andrew E Simor; Arun Seth; David R Urbach; Steven A Narod Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Marloes van der Leest; Erik Cornel; Bas Israël; Rianne Hendriks; Anwar R Padhani; Martijn Hoogenboom; Patrik Zamecnik; Dirk Bakker; Anglita Yanti Setiasti; Jeroen Veltman; Huib van den Hout; Hans van der Lelij; Inge van Oort; Sjoerd Klaver; Frans Debruyne; Michiel Sedelaar; Gerjon Hannink; Maroeska Rovers; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: B Candas; L Cusan; J L Gomez; P Diamond; R E Suburu; J Lévesque; G Brousseau; A Bélanger; F Labrie Journal: Prostate Date: 2000-09-15 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Arnout R Alberts; Monique J Roobol; Jan F M Verbeek; Ivo G Schoots; Peter K Chiu; Daniël F Osses; Jasper D Tijsterman; Harrie P Beerlage; Christophe K Mannaerts; Lars Schimmöller; Peter Albers; Christian Arsov Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Louise Clare Brown; Hashim U Ahmed; Rita Faria; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Rhian Gabe; Richard S Kaplan; Mahesh Parmar; Yolanda Collaco-Moraes; Katie Ward; Richard Graham Hindley; Alex Freeman; Alexander Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Simon Bott; Nick Burns-Cox; Tim Dudderidge; Maneesh Ghei; Alastair Henderson; Rajendra Persad; Derek J Rosario; Iqbal Shergill; Mathias Winkler; Marta Soares; Eldon Spackman; Mark Sculpher; Mark Emberton Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Hashim U Ahmed; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Louise C Brown; Rhian Gabe; Richard Kaplan; Mahesh K Parmar; Yolanda Collaco-Moraes; Katie Ward; Richard G Hindley; Alex Freeman; Alex P Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Mark Emberton Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 79.321