Literature DB >> 31637569

Glycan size and attachment site location affect electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation and automated glycopeptide identification.

Kathirvel Alagesan1,2,3, Hannes Hinneburg2,3,4, Peter H Seeberger2,3, Daniel Varón Silva2, Daniel Kolarich5,6,7.   

Abstract

We established a small synthetic N-glycopeptide library to systematically evaluate the effect of glycosylation site location and glycan size on the efficiency of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation and subsequent automated identification. The glycopeptides within this library differed in glycosylation site position and glycan size ranging from the pentasaccharide N-glycan core to fully sialylated, biantennary N-glycans. Factors such as glycan size, glycosylation site position within a glycopeptide and individual precursor m/z all significantly impacted the number and quality of assignable glycopeptide backbone fragments. Generally, high charge/low m/z precursors (>3+) and glycopeptides carrying neutral, smaller N-glycans gave better product ion spectra, while hardly any product ions were detectable for sialylated, triply charged N-glycopeptides. These factors impacted correct glycopeptide identification by proteomics software tools such as SEQUEST or Amanda. A better understanding how glycopeptide physico-chemical properties influence fragmentation will help optimizing fragmentation conditions and generate better data, which will facilitate software assisted glycopeptide data analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ETD; Electron transfer dissociation; Glycopeptide; Glycoproteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31637569     DOI: 10.1007/s10719-019-09888-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glycoconj J        ISSN: 0282-0080            Impact factor:   2.916


  19 in total

1.  Improving software performance for peptide electron transfer dissociation data analysis by implementation of charge state- and sequence-dependent scoring.

Authors:  Peter R Baker; Katalin F Medzihradszky; Robert J Chalkley
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE).

Authors:  Chris F Taylor; Norman W Paton; Kathryn S Lilley; Pierre-Alain Binz; Randall K Julian; Andrew R Jones; Weimin Zhu; Rolf Apweiler; Ruedi Aebersold; Eric W Deutsch; Michael J Dunn; Albert J R Heck; Alexander Leitner; Marcus Macht; Matthias Mann; Lennart Martens; Thomas A Neubert; Scott D Patterson; Peipei Ping; Sean L Seymour; Puneet Souda; Akira Tsugita; Joel Vandekerckhove; Thomas M Vondriska; Julian P Whitelegge; Marc R Wilkins; Ioannnis Xenarios; John R Yates; Henning Hermjakob
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Characterization of glycopeptides by combining collision-induced dissociation and electron-transfer dissociation mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  William R Alley; Yehia Mechref; Milos V Novotny
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Quantitative mapping of glycoprotein micro-heterogeneity and macro-heterogeneity: an evaluation of mass spectrometry signal strengths using synthetic peptides and glycopeptides.

Authors:  Kathrin Stavenhagen; Hannes Hinneburg; Morten Thaysen-Andersen; Laura Hartmann; Daniel Varón Silva; Jens Fuchser; Stephanie Kaspar; Erdmann Rapp; Peter H Seeberger; Daniel Kolarich
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.982

Review 5.  Principles of electron capture and transfer dissociation mass spectrometry applied to peptide and protein structure analysis.

Authors:  Konstantin O Zhurov; Luca Fornelli; Matthew D Wodrich; Ünige A Laskay; Yury O Tsybin
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 6.  Glycoproteomics based on tandem mass spectrometry of glycopeptides.

Authors:  Manfred Wuhrer; M Isabel Catalina; André M Deelder; Cornelis H Hokke
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Distinguishing N-acetylneuraminic acid linkage isomers on glycopeptides by ion mobility-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  H Hinneburg; J Hofmann; W B Struwe; A Thader; F Altmann; D Varón Silva; P H Seeberger; K Pagel; D Kolarich
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Toward a general mechanism of electron capture dissociation.

Authors:  Erik A Syrstad; Frantisek Turecek
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  The Art of Destruction: Optimizing Collision Energies in Quadrupole-Time of Flight (Q-TOF) Instruments for Glycopeptide-Based Glycoproteomics.

Authors:  Hannes Hinneburg; Kathrin Stavenhagen; Ulrike Schweiger-Hufnagel; Stuart Pengelley; Wolfgang Jabs; Peter H Seeberger; Daniel Varón Silva; Manfred Wuhrer; Daniel Kolarich
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  It is all about the solvent: on the importance of the mobile phase for ZIC-HILIC glycopeptide enrichment.

Authors:  Kathirvel Alagesan; Sana Khan Khilji; Daniel Kolarich
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  8 in total

1.  Glycoproteomics Technologies in Glycobiotechnology.

Authors:  Kathirvel Alagesan; Marcus Hoffmann; Erdmann Rapp; Daniel Kolarich
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.635

Review 2.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Techniques to Elucidate the Sugar Code.

Authors:  Márkó Grabarics; Maike Lettow; Carla Kirschbaum; Kim Greis; Christian Manz; Kevin Pagel
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 72.087

3.  Analysis of Viral Spike Protein N-Glycosylation Using Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Edwin E Escobar; Shuaishuai Wang; Rupanjan Goswami; Michael B Lanzillotti; Lei Li; Jason S McLellan; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 8.008

4.  Open Database Searching Enables the Identification and Comparison of Bacterial Glycoproteomes without Defining Glycan Compositions Prior to Searching.

Authors:  Ameera Raudah Ahmad Izaham; Nichollas E Scott
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Effective discrimination of gas-phase peptide conformers using TIMS-ECD-ToF MS/MS.

Authors:  K Jeanne Dit Fouque; M Wellmann; D Leyva Bombuse; M Santos-Fernandez; Y L Cintron-Diaz; M E Gomez-Hernandez; D Kaplan; V G Voinov; F Fernandez-Lima
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Optimal Dissociation Methods Differ for N- and O-Glycopeptides.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Stacy A Malaker; Marc D Driessen; Carolyn R Bertozzi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Depolarization-dependent Induction of Site-specific Changes in Sialylation on N-linked Glycoproteins in Rat Nerve Terminals.

Authors:  Inga Boll; Pia Jensen; Veit Schwämmle; Martin R Larsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  The Hitchhiker's guide to glycoproteomics.

Authors:  Tiago Oliveira; Morten Thaysen-Andersen; Nicolle H Packer; Daniel Kolarich
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.407

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.