Literature DB >> 31636740

Updates on Ultrasonography Imaging in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Shinichi Iwakoshi1, Toshiko Hirai1, Kimihiko Kichikawa1.   

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are life-threatening and are associated with >80% mortality when they rupture. Therefore, detecting these aneurysms before they rupture is critical. Ultrasonography is a non-invasive tool that is used for screening AAAs by measuring abdominal aorta diameter. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated the positive effects of ultrasonography. To date, aneurysm diameter is the most reliable predictor for aneurysm rupture and is used as a criterion for surgical intervention. However, some AAAs rupture at small diameters. Therefore, a better predictor for AAA rupture that is independent of aneurysm diameter is needed. Recently, an aortic wall strain examined using ultrasonography has been reported to have a potential in predicting AAA rupture. Since the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), a paradigm shift has occurred in the management of AAAs. EVAR is broadly spread with the advantage of early favorable results but with concerning endoleak complications. At present, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered to be a gold standard for surveillance following EVAR, but it encounters some problems, such as contrast usage or radiation exposure. Ultrasonography offers an examination free from these problems and can this be an alternative to CTA. In this review article, current trends and new technologies regarding AAA assessment using ultrasonography are introduced.
Copyright © 2019 Annals of Vascular Diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal aortic aneurysm; endoleak; screening; ultrasound

Year:  2019        PMID: 31636740      PMCID: PMC6766764          DOI: 10.3400/avd.ra.19-00070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis        ISSN: 1881-641X


  11 in total

1.  Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Reduces All-Cause Mortality: Make Screening Great Again.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Tomo Ando; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) versus computed tomography angiography (CTA) in detection of endoleaks in post-EVAR patients. Are delayed type II endoleaks being missed? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Chung; A Kordzadeh; I Prionidis; Y Panayiotopoulos; T Browne
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2015-01-17

3.  Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajesh Patel; Michael J Sweeting; Janet T Powell; Roger M Greenhalgh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  High Resolution Strain Analysis Comparing Aorta and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Real Time Three Dimensional Speckle Tracking Ultrasound.

Authors:  W Derwich; A Wittek; K Pfister; K Nelson; J Bereiter-Hahn; C P Fritzen; C Blase; T Schmitz-Rixen
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.

Authors:  Rosie Darwood; Jonothan J Earnshaw; Glenda Turton; Elaine Shaw; Mark Whyman; Keith Poskitt; Caroline Rodd; Brian Heather
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and/or colour duplex ultrasound for surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Miriam Brazzelli; Rodolfo Hernández; Pawana Sharma; Clare Robertson; Michal Shimonovich; Graeme MacLennan; Cynthia Fraser; Russell Jamieson; Srinivasa Rao Vallabhaneni
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Strain measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm with real-time 3D ultrasound speckle tracking.

Authors:  P Bihari; A Shelke; T H Nwe; M Mularczyk; K Nelson; T Schmandra; P Knez; T Schmitz-Rixen
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm development in men following a "normal" aortic ultrasound scan.

Authors:  H Hafez; P S Druce; H A Ashton
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 9.  Prevalence and risk factors of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiang Guo; Xiaojiong Du; Jichun Zhao; Yukui Ma; Bin Huang; Ding Yuan; Yi Yang; Guojun Zeng; Fei Xiong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.

Authors:  S G Thompson; H A Ashton; L Gao; M J Buxton; R A P Scott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.