Literature DB >> 22503187

Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.

Rosie Darwood1, Jonothan J Earnshaw, Glenda Turton, Elaine Shaw, Mark Whyman, Keith Poskitt, Caroline Rodd, Brian Heather.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An ultrasound screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in men began in Gloucestershire in 1990 and has been running for 20 years. This report examines the workload and results.
METHODS: We reviewed the screening database for attendance and outcome records from AAA surgery in Gloucestershire and postmortem and death certificate results looking for men who died from ruptured AAAs in the screening cohort. The setting was an AAA screening program in the county of Gloucestershire, UK. Men aged 65 were invited by year of birth to attend for an ultrasound screening for AAAs. Men with an aorta <2.6 cm were reassured and discharged; men with an aorta between 2.6 cm and 5.4 cm were offered follow-up surveillance; men with an aorta >5.4 cm were considered for intervention. We analyzed attendance rates, screening and surveillance outcomes, and intervention rates and outcomes over the 20 years of the study.
RESULTS: Some 61,982 men were invited, and 52,690 attended for screening (85% attendance). At first scan, 50,130 men (95.14%) had an aortic diameter <2.6 cm in diameter and were reassured and discharged; 148 men (0.28%) had an AAA >5.4 cm in diameter and were referred for possible treatment; 2412 (4.57%) had an aortic diameter between 2.6 and 5.4 cm and entered a program of ultrasound surveillance. The overall mean aortic diameter on initial scan fell from 2.1 cm to 1.7 cm during the study (reduction 0.015 cm/y, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0144-0.0156 cm/y; P < .0001). Some 631 patients with AAAs had intervention treatment with a perioperative mortality rate of 3.9%; during the same interval, 372 AAAs detected incidentally were treated, with a mortality rate of 6.7%. The number of ruptured AAAs treated annually in Gloucestershire fell during the study (χ(2) for trend = 18.31, df = 1; P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Screening reduced the number of ruptured AAAs in Gloucestershire during the 20 years of the program. There has been a significant reduction of men with an abnormal aorta, as the mean aortic diameter of the 65-year-old male has reduced over 20 years.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503187     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  23 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Positron Emission Tomography Fluorine-18-Labeled 2-Deoxy-2-Fluoro-d-Glucose Tells a Complicated Story in the Aortic Aneurysm Wall.

Authors:  John A Curci; Joshua A Beckman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Scientific second-order 'nudging' or lobbying by interest groups: the battle over abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programmes.

Authors:  Thomas Ploug; Søren Holm; John Brodersen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-11

4.  Modeling the Growth of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Marc A Bailey; Paul D Baxter; Tao Jiang; Aimee M Charnell; Kathryn J Griffin; Anne B Johnson; Katherine I Bridge; Soroush Sohrabi; D Julian A Scott
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2013-12-01

Review 5.  Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evolving Controversies and Uncertainties.

Authors:  Davide Carino; Timur P Sarac; Bulat A Ziganshin; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-05-29

6.  Prevalence of previously undiagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysms in the area of Como: the ComoCuore "looking for AAA" ultrasonography screening.

Authors:  Giovanni Corrado; Alessandro Durante; Vincenzo Genchi; Loris Trabattoni; Sandro Beretta; Enza Rovelli; Giovanni Foglia-Manzillo; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the Oxford Vascular Study.

Authors:  Dominic P J Howard; Amitava Banerjee; Jack F Fairhead; Jeremy Perkins; Louise E Silver; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.

Authors:  S G Thompson; H A Ashton; L Gao; M J Buxton; R A P Scott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Reference diameters of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in the Korean population.

Authors:  Jin Hyun Joh; Hyung-Joon Ahn; Ho-Chul Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  Current evidence on screening for renal cancer.

Authors:  Juliet Usher-Smith; Rebecca K Simmons; Sabrina H Rossi; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 16.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.