Literature DB >> 31636415

Structural basis of temperature sensation by the TRP channel TRPV3.

Appu K Singh1, Luke L McGoldrick1,2, Lusine Demirkhanyan3, Merfilius Leslie3, Eleonora Zakharian3, Alexander I Sobolevsky4.   

Abstract

We present structures of mouse TRPV3 in temperature-dependent open, closed and intermediate states that suggest two-step activation of TRPV3 by heat. During the strongly temperature-dependent first step, sensitization, the channel pore remains closed while S6 helices undergo α-to-π transitions. During the weakly temperature-dependent second step, channel opening, tight association of the S1-S4 and pore domains is stabilized by changes in the carboxy-terminal and linker domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31636415      PMCID: PMC6858569          DOI: 10.1038/s41594-019-0318-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


Temperature perception is mediated by temperature-sensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, thermo-TRPs, that exhibit unusually high temperature coefficient (Q10) values compared to non-temperature sensitive ion channels[1-4]. Four members of the vanilloid subfamily TRP channels are thermo-TRPs: TRPV1 and TRPV2 are activated by noxious heat (>43°C), while TRPV3 and TRPV4 can respond to warm temperatures (< 33°C)[5-8]. TRPV3 is predominantly expressed in skin and mediates warm and pain sensation[5,8]. Temperature-dependent activation of TRPV3 is use-dependent and hysteretic; its initial activation requires higher temperatures (>50°C), while subsequent activation can occur at lower temperatures (~33°C)[9]. Recent structures of TRPV3 have provided an insight into its architecture and ligand-dependent gating[10,11]. However, how thermo-TRPs, including TRPV3, respond to changes in temperature remains largely unknown[12-14]. We purified full-length wild-type mouse TRPV3 (TRPV3WT) and tested its function in lipid bilayers (Methods). No TRPV3WT activity was detected at room temperature, while a temperature increase induced robust channel openings (Fig. 1a). At 42°C, the open probability, Po, was ~0.36 and the conductance was weakly voltage-dependent (Fig. 1b). Consistent with the previous measurements[8,15], the strong temperature dependence of the TRPV3WT Po yielded a high Q10 = 26.9 ± 7.4 (n = 19, Fig. 1c). We incubated purified TRPV3WT at different temperatures and subjected it to cryo-EM. At 42°C, data processing revealed two distinct 3D reconstructions (Extended Data Figs. 1–2, Supplementary Table 1), one representing the closed state, the other a putative sensitized state (for simplicity will be referred to as the sensitized state).
Figure 1.

Functional characterization and structures of TRPV3WT at 42°C.

a, Representative single-channel recordings of TRPV3WT-mediated currents at 22°C and 42°C and at +100 mV membrane potential (n = 5; 2,538 were analyzed). b, TRPV3WT current-voltage (I-V) relationship at 42°C. The data (mean ± SEM) represent 15 independent experiments and 114,629 events. c, Temperature-dependence of Po recorded at +100 mV (n = 12; 67,673 events were analyzed). Fitting the data allows the temperature coefficient to be estimated, Q10 = 26.9 ± 7.4 (n = 19). d–e, Structure of TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C viewed parallel to membrane (d) or intracellularly (e) with each of the four subunits colored differently and semi-transparent, the density for the C-terminal domain colored red, and the lipid-like densities colored blue. f–g, TRPV3WT pore-forming domains in the closed (TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C, f) and sensitized (TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C, g) states with the residues lining the pore shown as sticks. Only two of four subunits are shown; the front and back subunits are omitted for clarity. The pore profiles are shown as space-filling models (grey). Residues in the closed state TRP helix form the C-terminal part of S6 in the sensitized state (red arrows).

Extended Data Fig. 1

Overview of cryo-EM data collected for TRPV3WT and TRPV3Y564A

Example micrographs from different TRPV3-construct collections with example particles circled in red (left column), reference-free 2D class averages in different orientations (middle column) and Euler angle distribution of particles contributing to the final reconstructions with larger red cylinders representing orientations comprising more particles (right column).

Extended Data Fig. 2

Resolution of TRPV3WT and TRPV3Y564A cryo-EM reconstructions

a, FSC curves calculated between half maps. b, FSC curves calculated between two unfiltered half-maps and the final map and a model whose coordinates were randomized and refined against only half map 1. c, Local resolution predicted by ResMap[30].

The 4.4-Å resolution closed-state structure (TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C, Fig. 1d–e) was nearly identical to the previously determined structure at 4°C (TRPV3WT-Closed-4°C, Extended Data Fig. 3)[11]. Indeed, the pore of TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C is hydrophobically sealed by methionines M677 at the crossing of the pore-lining S6 transmembrane segments, which are α-helical in their entirety (Fig. 1f). Importantly, at this high temperature, the transmembrane region of TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C retains its lipid-like densities in binding sites 1 and 2, which were identified earlier in TRPV3WT-Closed-4°C (Extended Data Fig. 3)[11]. Because of the limited resolution, we cannot unambiguously identify these densities as lipids or determine the exact type of these putative lipids. The 4.5-Å resolution sensitized state structure (TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C) shows an α-to-π transition in the middle of each S6 helix. This results in an ~100° axial rotation of the C-terminal half of S6, which becomes two helical turns longer, while the TRP helix becomes two helical turns shorter. Consequently, a different set of S6 residues face the channel pore compared to the closed state (Fig. 1g), including the highly conserved N671[16]. In TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C, the side chain of each M677 points away from the pore. Nevertheless, the pore remains closed as a result of the I674 hydrophobic seal. Not observing an open conformation of TRPV3WT at 42°C is unsurprising because of low Po of the channel (Fig. 1c) that requires higher temperatures for efficient activation[9,17].
Extended Data Fig. 3

Comparison of TRPV3WT closed state structures at 4°C and 42°C

a–b, Overall superposition of TRPV3WT-closed-4⍛C (red) and TRPV3WT-closed-42⍛C (blue) structures viewed parallel to membrane (a) or intracellularly (b). c, Pore radii calculated using HOLE[29]. The vertical dashed line denotes the radius of a water molecule, 1.4 Å. d–e, Expanded view of the transmembrane domain of one TRPV3WT-Closed-4⍛C (d) or TRPV3WT-Closed-42⍛C (e) subunit with lipid-like densities shown as purple mesh.

To determine the structure of TRPV3 in a temperature-activated open state, we looked for constructs with increased temperature sensitivity. We tested TRPV3Y564A, which contains a single residue substitution in the binding site 2 (Extended Data Figure 4)[11]. Presumably, Y564 is directly involved in putative lipid 2 binding; its substitution to alanine lowers affinity to the putative lipid and enhances affinity to the agonist 2-APB, which compete for the same site[11]. In lipid bilayers, this mutant channel is highly sensitized when compared to TRPV3WT; it shows weak temperature sensitivity and is open at both 22°C and 42°C (Fig. 2a). The single-channel conductance of TRPV3Y564A is similar to TRPV3WT (Fig. 2b), but the markedly reduced steepness of the Po temperature dependence results in a dramatically lower Q10 (1.21 ± 0.20; n = 21, Fig. 2c).
Extended Data Fig. 4

Architecture and domain organization of TRPV3

a–b, Top (a) and side (b) views of the TRPV3 tetramer, with each subunit shown in a different color. c, Domain organization diagram of the TRPV3 subunit. d, Structure of TRPV3 subunit, with domains colored as in c. Alanine substituting tyrosine Y564 in TRPV3Y564A is shown in red space-filling representation (a, b and d) or indicated by the red circle (c).

Figure 2.

Functional characterization and structures of TRPV3Y564A at 4°C and 37°C.

a, Representative single-channel recordings of TRPV3Y564A-mediated currents at 22°C and 42°C and at +100 mV membrane potential (n = 5; 2,538 events were analyzed). b, TRPV3Y564A current-voltage (I-V) relationship at 22°C. The data (mean ± SEM) represent 15 independent experiments and 114,629 events. c, Temperature-dependence of Po recorded at +100 mV (n = 12; 67,673 events were analyzed). Fitting the data yields the temperature coefficient, Q10 = 1.21 ± 0.20 (n = 21). d–e, Structure of TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C viewed parallel to membrane (d) or intracellularly (e) with each of the four subunits colored differently and semi-transparent, and the density for the C-terminal domain colored red. f–h, Pore-forming domain of TRPV3Y564A in the sensitized (TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C, f; TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-37°C, e) and open (TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C, h) states with residues lining the pore shown as sticks. Only two of four subunits are shown; the front and back subunits are omitted for clarity. The pore profiles are shown as space-filling models (grey). i, Pore radii calculated using HOLE[29] for TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C (blue), TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C (dark green), TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C (green), TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-37°C (light green) and TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C (orange). The vertical dashed line denotes the radius of a water molecule, 1.4 Å. j–k, TRPV3Y564A-Intermediate-37°C viewed parallel to membrane (j) or intracellularly (k). l–m, Expanded views of the intersubunit interfaces between subunits D and A (l) and A and B (m). The C-terminus is highlighted in red and thickened for clarity. Conserved residues at the C-terminus-ARD interfaces are shown as sticks.

We first determined TRPV3Y564A structure at 4°C (Extended Data Figs. 1–2) at an overall resolution of 4.1 Å, which is higher than the resolution of the previous structure[11]. Due to its high resemblance to TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C, we termed this structure TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C. The similarity in structures and single-channel conductances (Figs. 1b and 2b) justifies usage of the Y564A mutant as a reasonable qualitative model of wild type for structural and functional studies. Nonetheless, increased affinity to 2-APB[11], higher open probability and reduced temperature sensitivity of TRPV3Y564A compared to TRPV3WT suggest that their quantitative comparisons should be made with caution. At 37°C, the majority of the TRPV3Y564A particles were classified into low-resolution reconstructions (Extended Data Figs. 1–2, 5), likely representing an ensemble of heterogeneous conformations. However, we determined three distinct structures comprising the minority of particles. The first, 5.18-Å resolution structure shows α-to-π transitions in its S6 helices along with a pore hydrophobically sealed by I674 (Fig. 2g), similar to TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C (Fig. 1g) and TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C (Fig. 2f). Therefore, we will refer to this structure as to TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-37°C.
Extended Data Fig. 5

3D reconstruction workflow

The second, 4.48-Å resolution structure (Fig. 2d–e) has an appearently open ion channel pore (Fig. 2h). Similar to 2-APB-bound TRPV3Y564A structure[11], the ion conduction pathway is lined by polar or negatively-charged side chains or backbone carbonyls, and has an overall negatively-charged surface, likely important for TRPV3 cation selectivity. The pore’s narrowest constriction at the intracellular gate region is defined by the side chains of I674 (interatomic distance of 9.7 Å) and is similar to the intracellular gate regions of open TRPV1[18] (9.3 Å, I679) and TRPV6[11] (9.6 Å, I575). We concluded that this structure (TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C) represents an open state of TRPV3Y564A that had been activated by heat. The third, 4.75-Å resolution structure of TRPV3Y564A at 37°C exhibits C2 symmetry (Fig. 2j–k), unlike our other TRPV3 structures which have C4 symmetry. This reconstruction lacks clear density for the pore domain, presumably because of strong conformational heterogeneity. In the intracellular skirt, the C-termini of two diagonal subunits, A and C, wrap around their respective three-stranded β-sheets at intersubunit interfaces (Fig. 2l–m), similar to the closed and sensitized state structures. In contrast, the C-termini of the B and D subunits point away from the membrane plane, similar to the open state structure. This C2 symmetrical structure (TRPV3Y564A-Intermediate-37°C) likely represents an intermediate state of the channel transitioning between the sensitized and open states. To understand heat-induced conformational changes in TRPV3, we compared the structures of TRPV3 in the closed and sensitized states and TRPV3Y564A in the sensitized and open states. The three structures in the sensitized state, TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C, TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C and TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-37°C, superpose well overall (RMSD = 1.01–1.12 Å) and have similar pore architecture and dimensions (Figs. 1g and 2f,g,i). Therefore, we propose that they represent the same state in the temperature gating mechanism of TRPV3. Because of low resolution, we exclude the TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-37°C structure from further detailed comparisons. Although all structures look grossly similar, the open state structure appears ~5 Å shorter compared to the closed and sensitized state structures and its intracellular skirt rotates ~8° clockwise, when viewed intracellularly (Fig. 3a–b). The most dramatic local conformational changes between the states occur in the transmembrane, linker and C-terminal domains.
Figure 3.

Conformational changes in response to heat.

a–b, Overall superposition of TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C (blue), TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C (dark green), TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C (light green) and TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C (orange) structures viewed parallel to membrane (a) or intracellularly (b). Only two of four subunits are shown in a; the front and back subunits are omitted for clarity. c–f, The S1–S5 and TRP helix of one subunit and S6 of the adjacent subunit from TRPV3WT-Closed-42°C (c) and the same region superposed on TRPV3WT-Sensitized-42°C (d), TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C (e) and TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C (f). The densities at sites 1 and 2 are shown as purple mesh. Domain movements relative to the closed state are indicated by red arrows. g–h, Superposition of TRPV3 structures based on the ARD. The C-terminus is thickened for clarity. Domain movements relative to the closed state are indicated by red arrows.

Conformational changes in the transmembrane domain are correlated with the presence of two lipid-like densities in binding sites 1 and 2. The first density is wedged in between the extracellular part of S4 and S6 (site 1), while the second one nests in a pocket formed by the S1–S4 bundle and the C-terminal part of the TRP helix (site 2). The densities in these two sites are prominent in the closed state, become weaker in the sensitized state, and disappear completely in the open state (Fig. 3c–f). In the TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4°C structure, the site 1 density disappears but another density appears in closer proximity to the S4–S5 linker (Fig. 3e). Dissociation of the site 1 density may promote S4 and S6 association (Supplementary Table 2). This transition is accompanied by S6 tilting towards S4, the α-to-π transition in S6, and consequently, the two helical turn elongation of S6, the two helical turn shortening of the TRP helix, and tilting of the TRP helix. Based on our structural results, channel opening, however, appears to not only require complete removal of the densities from sites 1 and 2, but also conformational changes in the linker and C-terminal domains. Strikingly, the ankyrin repeat domains (ARDs) in all structures are nearly identical (RMSD = 0.43–1.07 Å, Fig. 3g–h). During the closed-to-sensitized and sensitized-to-open state transitions, the ARDs move as rigid bodies while the domains connecting them to each other and to the transmembrane domain undergo significant structural rearrangements. Among these connecting domains, the most drastic changes occur in the ARD finger 3, the AR5 helix connecting loop, the linker domain, which includes helices LH1, LH2, and pre-S1, the three-stranded β-sheet and the C-terminus. Indeed, numerous studies have revealed that mutations in these domains affect thermo-TRP temperature-dependent gating[17,19-25]. The C-terminus has been proposed to play an important role in thermo-TRP temperature-dependent gating[19-21,26]. Deletions or swapping of C-termini not only made temperature sensitivity stronger or weaker but also reversed temperature sensitivities, making heat-sensitive channels cold-sensitive and vice versa[21]. Consistently, the sensitized-to-open state transition in TRPV3 is accompanied by significant conformational changes in the C-terminus (Extended Data Fig. 6). In the closed and sensitized states, the C-terminus wraps around the 3-stranded β-sheet, while in the open state, it unwraps and projects towards the cytoplasm (Figs. 1–3). In the open state, the dissociated portion of the C-terminus is partially replaced by a 12-residue long polypeptide bound to the inter-subunit interface that likely represents a portion of the N-terminus that was unfolded and unobserved in the closed and sensitized states, although the possibility that the polypeptide density corresponds to a more distal portion of the C-terminus cannot be excluded. The C-terminus appears to function as a latch that structurally supports the closed and sensitized states and that needs to be released for the channel to open. The C-terminus interacts with residues that are conserved in the thermo-TRPVs but not in TRPV5/6 (Supplementary Fig. 1). For example, conserved residues W739 and W742 interact with hydrophobic residues and arginine R226 in the ARDs. Mutating R226 resulted in increased channel activity[27]. Additionally, the thermo-TRPV linker domains contain an 11-residue insertion that, in our structures, interacts with the C-terminal region in both the closed and sensitized states, but not in the open state, and likely transmits conformational changes between the TMD and ARD during gating. Changes in the linker domain result in altered TRPV3 temperature-dependent gating[17,28].
Extended Data Fig. 6

C-terminus unlatching during channel opening

a–b, Expanded view of the cytosolic inter-subunit interface in TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4⍛C (a) and TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C (b). The C-termini and the putative N-terminus fragment from the TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C adjacent subunit are thickened for clarity. Conserved residues at the C-terminus-ARD interfaces are shown as sticks. Movement of the AR5 loop in the open state relative to the sensitized or closed state is indicated by a red arrow.

Superposition of the open state structures obtained in the presence of the agonist 2-APB[11] or at high temperature (Extended Data Fig. 7a–c), shows that they are very similar (RMSD =1.01 Å) and have similar pore architectures and dimensions. However, in TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C, the 2-APB binding pockets are unoccupied (Extended Data Fig. 7d–f). It appears that 2-APB and heat activate TRPV3 via similar mechanisms; both lead to S4 and S6 interactions and the release of the C-terminal latch. Better understanding of these mechanisms and the role of lipids in temperature sensation by TRPV3 and thermo-TRPs in general awaits further investigation.
Extended Data Fig. 7

Comparison of heat- and ligand-activated open states

a–c, Overall superposition of TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C (orange) and TRPV3Y564A-Open-2-APB (grey) viewed extracellularly (a) and parallel to membrane (b) and an expanded view of the transmembrane domain of one subunit (c). 2-APB molecules bound to TRPV3Y564A-Open-2-APB structure are shown as space-filling models. d-f, Expanded views of binding sites 2 (d), 3 (e) and 4 (f). The 2-APB molecules bound to TRPV3Y564A-Open-2-APB are shown as sticks and the TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C density is shown as blue mesh. TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C residues that would clash with the 2-APB molecules are shown in stick representation.

Methods

Construct

The full-length mouse TRPV3WT (residues 1–825) was cloned into a pEG BacMam vector[31], with the C-terminal thrombin cleavage site (LVPRG) followed by the streptavidin affinity tag (WSHPQFEK) as was done previously for TRPV3[11]. TRPV3Y564A construct was produced using standard mutagenesis procedure.

Expression and purification

TRPV3 constructs were expressed and purified as was done previously for TRPV3 with minor differences[11]. Bacmids and baculoviruses were produced as described in the literature[31]. In short, baculovirus was made in Sf9 cells for ~72 hours (Thermo Fisher Scientific, mycoplasma test negative, GIBCO #12659017) and was applied to the suspension adapted HEK 293S cells lacking N-acetyl-glucosaminyltransferase I (GnTI−, mycoplasma test negative, ATCC #CRL-3022) that were maintained in Freestyle 293 media (Gibco-Life Technologies #12338–018) supplemented with 2% FBS in presence of 5% CO2. The cells were cultured at 37°C for ~10 hours with a baculovirus, after which 10 mM sodium butyrate was added to the cells with a concurrent reduction in temperature to 30°C. 48–60 hours post-transduction, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,471 g for 15 min using a Sorvall Evolution RC Centrifuge (Thermo Scientific), washed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) pH 8.0, and pelleted again by centrifugation at 3,202 g for 10 min using an Eppendorf Centrifuge 5810. After resuspension in buffer (50 ml per 800 ml of culture) containing 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM βME (β-mercaptoethanol) and protease inhibitors (0.8 μM aprotinin, 2 μg/ml leupeptin, 2 μM pepstatin A and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) the cells were subjected to sonication with a Misonix sonicator (12 × 15 s, power level 8). After sonication, the cell lysate was cleared by slow speed centrifugation and the resulting supernatant was subjected to ultracentrifugation in a Beckman Coulter ultracentrifuge using Beckman Coulter Type Ti-45 rotor at 186,000 g for 1 hour to pellet the membranes. The membranes were mechanically homogenized and solubilized for ~2 hours in buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1% digitonin and 1 mM βME. The mixture was subjected to ultracentrifugation for 1 hour at 186,000 g to remove any remaining insoluble material. The supernatant was added to a streptavidin-linked resin and rotated for 10–14 hours at 4°C. The resin was washed with 10 column volumes of wash buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM BME and 0.01% GDN and the protein was eluted with the same buffer supplemented with 2.5 mM D-desthiobiotin. All constructs were further purified by size-exclusion chromatography using a Superose 6 column equilibrated in 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1mM βME and 0.01% GDN. Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP, 10 mM) was added to the tetrameric peak fractions which were pooled together and concentrated to ~4.5 mg/ml.

Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection

Au/Au grids were prepared as described in the literature[32]. Briefly, grids were prepared by first coating C-flat (Protochips, Inc., Morrisville, NC) CF-1.2/1.3–2Au mesh holey carbon grids with ~60 nm of gold using an Edwards Auto 306 evaporator. Subsequently, an Ar/O2 plasma treatment (4 min, 50 watts, 35.0 sccm Ar, 11.5 sccm O2) was used to remove the carbon with a Gatan Solarus (model 950) Advanced Plasma Cleaning System. The grids were again plasma treated (H2/O2, 20 s, 10 watts, 6.4 sccm H2, 27.5 sccm O2) prior to sample application in order to make their surfaces hydrophilic. A 3-µl protein solution was applied on the gold side of the grid and then the sample was blotted for 2 s with a blot force of 3, and a wait time of 20 s. Subsequently, the grid was plunge frozen in liquid ethane using Vitrobot Mark V1 that was set to 100% humidity and 42°C for TRPV3WT-42°C, 4 °C for TRPV3Y564A-4°C, and 37 °C for TRPV3Y564A-37°C. To get structures of TRPV3 at the corresponding temperatures, the purified protein samples were kept at 42°C for TRPV3WT-42°C and 37 °C for TRPV3Y564A-37°C for a maximum of 4–5 min prior to applying on grids. Incubation of TRPV3WT at 48°C resulted in grids with non-vitreous ice and, as a result, precluded particle visualization using cryo-EM. However, incubation of TRPV3WT grids at 42°C prior to plunge freezing resulted in vitreous ice and ultimately, high-resolution 3D reconstructions (Extended Data Figs. 1–2, Supplementary Table 1). The TRPV3WT-42°C data were collected on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Titan Krios TEM (FEI) microscope operating at 300 kV equipped with a post-column GIF Quantum energy filter, and a Gatan K2 Summit direct electron detection (DED) camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA). 6407 movies were collected in counting mode with a calibrated magnification of 130,000 that corresponds to a pixel size of 1.06 Å. The defocus range was set to −1.0 µm to −2.5 µm during dataset acquisition. For each movie, a total dose, ~57 e−Å−2, was attained by using a dose rate of ~8.0 e-pixel−1s−1 across 40 frames for 8 s total exposure time. The TRPV3Y564A-4°C data were collected on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Titan Krios TEM (FEI) microscope operating at 300 kV equipped with a post-column GIF Quantum energy filter, and a Gatan K2 Summit direct electron detection (DED) camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA). 5882 movies were collected in counting mode with a calibrated magnification of 130,000 that corresponds to a pixel size of 1.06 Å. The defocus range was set to −1.0 µm to −2.5 µm during dataset acquisition. For each movie, a total dose, ~57 e−Å−2, was attained by using a dose rate of ~8.0 e-pixel−1s−1 across 40 frames for 8 s total exposure time. The multiple TRPV3Y564A-37°C data were collected on Titan Krios TEM operating at 300 kV equipped with a Gatan K2 Summit DED camera using Leginon[33]. Four Titan Krios collections, resulting in a total of 18,901 micrographs, were collected in counting mode with a pixel size of 1.06 Å. A defocus range of −1.5 µm to −3.0 µm was used and the total dose, ~57 e−Å−2, was attained by using a dose rate of 8.0 e-pixel−1s−1 across 40 frames for 8 s total exposure time.

Image processing

All TRPV3 data were processed in Relion 3.0[34] and cryoSPARC[35]. All the movies were motion-corrected with MotionCor2 algorithm implemented in RELION. CTF estimation was performed in Gctf[36] on non-dose-weighted micrographs while subsequent data processing was done on dose-weighted micrographs. The TRPV3WT-42°C dataset was processed as follows. Initially, ~1000 particles were manually picked to generate 2D class templates that were subsequently used to automatically pick 1,541,116 particles. Automatically picked particles were extracted with a box size of 220 pixels in RELION 3.0[34]. The extracted particle images were subjected to 3D classification into ten classes, using the closed state structure of TRPV3 as a reference[11] (PDB: 6DVW). One class, composed of 342,688 particles, was refined with C1 symmetry and post-processed. The resulting ~5.7 Å structure was used a reference for the next round of 3D classification (with C1 symmetry) in which the ~342,688 particles were separated into another 10 classes. 2 of the resulting classes, composed of 33,741 and 50,647 particles, were refined with C4 symmetry and post-processed to generate the final 4.4 Å and 4.5 Å maps for the closed and sensitized states of TRPV3WT-42°C. Similar processing workflow was adopted for the TRPV3Y564A-4°C that resulted in a final 3D reconstruction at 4.07 Å resolution. However, similar processing procedure applied to TRPV3Y564A-37°C data resulted in ~7.0 Å resolution reconstruction, presumably because of most of the particles for this dataset were either unfolded on the grid or highly heterogeneous. Indeed, 3D classification showed both of these features in processed particles, limiting our efforts to structure determination. To increase the number of particles in the open state, we collected a total of four datasets on Titan Krios, that resulted in 18901 micrographs. The total of ~6,000,000 particles were extracted with the box size of 220 pixels. These extracted particles were subjected to multiple rounds of heterogeneous classification in RELION[34] (Extended Data Fig. 5), resulting in three major classes: TRPV3Y564A-Open-37°C, TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-37°C, and TRPV3Y564A-Intermediate-37°C. TRPV3Y564A-Intermediate-37°C represented C2 symmetric structure in which the intracellular ankyrin repeat domain was resolved well, while the channel pore was resolved poorly. The fraction of particles representing each state in our heterogeneous datasets yielding multiple conformations (Supplementary Table 1) does not necessarily match the representation of the corresponding states in our functional experiments (Figs. 1–2). The reason for this discrepancy is the inherent difference between conditions of the protein sample in cryo-EM and in the lipid bilayer experiments. These include a different physical environment for the transmembrane portion of the protein (detergent micelle versus lipid bilayer) as well as protein interactions with the thin layer of vitreous ice (including surface tension effects) and possibly with the material of the grid (gold mesh). Nevertheless, despite the absolute numbers of particles in the cryo-EM datasets do not match representations of the corresponding states in functional experiments, the qualitative presence of these states is likely preserved. The reported resolutions of the final maps were estimated using the Fourier shell correlation (FSC)=0.143 criterion[37] on masking-effect-corrected FSC curves calculated between two independent half-maps[38]. The local resolutions were estimated with unfiltered half maps using ResMap[30] and EM density visualization was done in UCSF Chimera[39].

Model building

To build the closed, sensitized and open state models of TRPV3 in COOT[40], we used the previously published cryo-EM structures of TRPV3 as guides[11]. The models were tested for overfitting (Extended Data Fig. 2) by shifting their coordinates by 0.5 Å (using shake) in PHENIX[41], refining each shaken model against a corresponding unfiltered half map, and generating densities from the resulting models in Chimera. FSC was calculated between the densities generated in Chimera and both unfiltered half maps and the sum maps, using EMAN2[42]. The local resolution of the transmembrane domains in all our reconstructions, except TRPV3Y564A-Intermediate-37°C, was higher compared to the resolution of the soluble domains, as evidenced by local resolution predictions made using ResMap[30]. High resolution of the transmembrane domains allowed us to unambiguously define the conformation of the pore-lining S6 helices in the closed, sensitized and open state structures. Structures were visualized and figures were prepared in Chimera and Pymol[43].

Planar lipid bilayer measurements

Planar lipid bilayers measurements were performed as described previously[44]. Briefly, planar lipid bilayers were formed from a solution of synthetic 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1’-rac-glycerol) (POPG), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocoline (POPC) and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE; Avanti Polar Lipids) at a 3:1:1 ratio in n-decane (Sigma-Aldrich). The solution was used to paint a bilayer in an aperture of ∼150 µm diameter in a Delrin cup (Warner Instruments) between symmetric aqueous bathing solutions of 150 mM KCl, 0.02 mM MgCl2, 1 μM CaCl2, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.2). Unless specified otherwise, all experiments were performed in the presence of 2.5 μM 1-(1,2R-dioctanoylphosphatidyl)inositol-4,5-bisphosphate, trisodium salt (DiC8-PIP2, Cayman Chemical) added to both compartments. All reagents (Sigma-Aldrich) were ultrapure (>99%). Bilayer capacitances were in the range of 50–75 pF. After the bilayers had formed, the micellar solution of TRPV3 protein (0.02 μg/ml) was added by painting. Unitary currents were recorded using the Axopatch 200B patch-clamp amplifier (Molecular Devices). The trans solution (command voltage side) was connected to the CV 201A head-stage input, while the cis solution was held at a virtual ground via a pair of matched Ag-AgCl electrodes. Currents through the voltage-clamped bilayers (background conductance, <1 pS) were filtered at the amplifier output (low pass, −3 dB at 10 kHz, 8-pole Bessel response). Data were filtered at 100 Hz through an 8-pole Bessel filter (950 TAF; Frequency Devices) and digitized at 1 kHz with an analog-to-digital converter Digidata 1322A controlled by pClamp10.3 software (Molecular Devices). Single-channel conductance events, all-points histograms, open probability (Po), and other parameters were identified and analyzed with Clampfit10.3 software (Molecular Devices). The experiments were performed in the temperature range from 22 to 42°C. For the temperature-dependence measurements, the bilayer recording chamber was fitted onto a conductive stage containing a pyroelectric heater/cooler that was controlled by a temperature controller (CL-100; Warner Instruments). Deionized water was circulated through the stage and pumped into the system to remove the generated heat. The temperature of the bath was constantly monitored using a thermoelectric device in the cis chamber (the ground side) and was reliably controlled within ±0.5°C. The temperature coefficients (Q10) for Po were calculated using Eq. 1: where X1 and X2 are Po values obtained at T1 and T2 temperatures measured in Kelvins. Statistical analysis was performed using Origin 9.0 (Microcal Software Inc.). Statistical significance was calculated using One-Way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s least significant difference test. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Overview of cryo-EM data collected for TRPV3WT and TRPV3Y564A

Example micrographs from different TRPV3-construct collections with example particles circled in red (left column), reference-free 2D class averages in different orientations (middle column) and Euler angle distribution of particles contributing to the final reconstructions with larger red cylinders representing orientations comprising more particles (right column).

Resolution of TRPV3WT and TRPV3Y564A cryo-EM reconstructions

a, FSC curves calculated between half maps. b, FSC curves calculated between two unfiltered half-maps and the final map and a model whose coordinates were randomized and refined against only half map 1. c, Local resolution predicted by ResMap[30].

Comparison of TRPV3WT closed state structures at 4°C and 42°C

a–b, Overall superposition of TRPV3WT-closed-4⍛C (red) and TRPV3WT-closed-42⍛C (blue) structures viewed parallel to membrane (a) or intracellularly (b). c, Pore radii calculated using HOLE[29]. The vertical dashed line denotes the radius of a water molecule, 1.4 Å. d–e, Expanded view of the transmembrane domain of one TRPV3WT-Closed-4⍛C (d) or TRPV3WT-Closed-42⍛C (e) subunit with lipid-like densities shown as purple mesh.

Architecture and domain organization of TRPV3

a–b, Top (a) and side (b) views of the TRPV3 tetramer, with each subunit shown in a different color. c, Domain organization diagram of the TRPV3 subunit. d, Structure of TRPV3 subunit, with domains colored as in c. Alanine substituting tyrosine Y564 in TRPV3Y564A is shown in red space-filling representation (a, b and d) or indicated by the red circle (c).

C-terminus unlatching during channel opening

a–b, Expanded view of the cytosolic inter-subunit interface in TRPV3Y564A-Sensitized-4⍛C (a) and TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C (b). The C-termini and the putative N-terminus fragment from the TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C adjacent subunit are thickened for clarity. Conserved residues at the C-terminus-ARD interfaces are shown as sticks. Movement of the AR5 loop in the open state relative to the sensitized or closed state is indicated by a red arrow.

Comparison of heat- and ligand-activated open states

a–c, Overall superposition of TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C (orange) and TRPV3Y564A-Open-2-APB (grey) viewed extracellularly (a) and parallel to membrane (b) and an expanded view of the transmembrane domain of one subunit (c). 2-APB molecules bound to TRPV3Y564A-Open-2-APB structure are shown as space-filling models. d-f, Expanded views of binding sites 2 (d), 3 (e) and 4 (f). The 2-APB molecules bound to TRPV3Y564A-Open-2-APB are shown as sticks and the TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C density is shown as blue mesh. TRPV3Y564A-Open-37⍛C residues that would clash with the 2-APB molecules are shown in stick representation.
  41 in total

1.  A heat-sensitive TRP channel expressed in keratinocytes.

Authors:  Andrea M Peier; Alison J Reeve; David A Andersson; Aziz Moqrich; Taryn J Earley; Anne C Hergarden; Gina M Story; Sian Colley; John B Hogenesch; Peter McIntyre; Stuart Bevan; Ardem Patapoutian
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  TRP channels as cellular sensors.

Authors:  David E Clapham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  ThermoTRP channels and beyond: mechanisms of temperature sensation.

Authors:  Ardem Patapoutian; Andrea M Peier; Gina M Story; Veena Viswanath
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Lessons from peppers and peppermint: the molecular logic of thermosensation.

Authors:  Sven-Eric Jordt; David D McKemy; David Julius
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway.

Authors:  M J Caterina; M A Schumacher; M Tominaga; T A Rosen; J D Levine; D Julius
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A capsaicin-receptor homologue with a high threshold for noxious heat.

Authors:  M J Caterina; T A Rosen; M Tominaga; A J Brake; D Julius
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  TRPV3 is a temperature-sensitive vanilloid receptor-like protein.

Authors:  G D Smith; M J Gunthorpe; R E Kelsell; P D Hayes; P Reilly; P Facer; J E Wright; J C Jerman; J-P Walhin; L Ooi; J Egerton; K J Charles; D Smart; A D Randall; P Anand; J B Davis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Heat-evoked activation of the ion channel, TRPV4.

Authors:  Ali Deniz Güler; Hyosang Lee; Tohko Iida; Isao Shimizu; Makoto Tominaga; Michael Caterina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Hysteresis of gating underlines sensitization of TRPV3 channels.

Authors:  Beiying Liu; Jing Yao; Michael X Zhu; Feng Qin
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Conformational ensemble of the human TRPV3 ion channel.

Authors:  Lejla Zubcevic; Mark A Herzik; Mengyu Wu; William F Borschel; Marscha Hirschi; Albert S Song; Gabriel C Lander; Seok-Yong Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Structural insights into the gating mechanisms of TRPV channels.

Authors:  Ruth A Pumroy; Edwin C Fluck; Tofayel Ahmed; Vera Y Moiseenkova-Bell
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.817

2.  A folding reaction at the C-terminal domain drives temperature sensing in TRPM8 channels.

Authors:  Ignacio Díaz-Franulic; Natalia Raddatz; Karen Castillo; Fernando D González-Nilo; Ramon Latorre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  TRPV3 expression and purification for structure determination by Cryo-EM.

Authors:  Arthur Neuberger; Kirill D Nadezhdin; Alexander I Sobolevsky
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Activation of the archaeal ion channel MthK is exquisitely regulated by temperature.

Authors:  Yihao Jiang; Vinay Idikuda; Sandipan Chowdhury; Baron Chanda
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Structure and function of the calcium-selective TRP channel TRPV6.

Authors:  Maria V Yelshanskaya; Kirill D Nadezhdin; Maria G Kurnikova; Alexander I Sobolevsky
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Heat-dependent opening of TRPV1 in the presence of capsaicin.

Authors:  Do Hoon Kwon; Feng Zhang; Yang Suo; Jonathan Bouvette; Mario J Borgnia; Seok-Yong Lee
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  Mapping temperature-dependent conformational change in the voltage-sensing domain of an engineered heat-activated K+ channel.

Authors:  Hongbo Chen; Jiahua Deng; Qiang Cui; Baron Chanda; Katherine Henzler-Wildman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A unique mode of keratinocyte death requires intracellular acidification.

Authors:  Takeshi Matsui; Nanako Kadono-Maekubo; Yoshiro Suzuki; Yuki Furuichi; Keiichiro Shiraga; Hiroyuki Sasaki; Azusa Ishida; Sonoko Takahashi; Takaharu Okada; Kiminori Toyooka; Jafar Sharif; Takaya Abe; Hiroshi Kiyonari; Makoto Tominaga; Atsushi Miyawaki; Masayuki Amagai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The newest TRP channelopathy: Gain of function TRPM3 mutations cause epilepsy and intellectual disability.

Authors:  Siyuan Zhao; Tibor Rohacs
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.493

10.  Structural mechanism of heat-induced opening of a temperature-sensitive TRP channel.

Authors:  Kirill D Nadezhdin; Arthur Neuberger; Yuri A Trofimov; Nikolay A Krylov; Viktor Sinica; Nikita Kupko; Viktorie Vlachova; Eleonora Zakharian; Roman G Efremov; Alexander I Sobolevsky
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.