| Literature DB >> 31635394 |
Vandermi João da Silva1, Vinicius da Silva Souza2, Robson Guimarães da Cruz3, Juliana Mesquita Vidal Martinez de Lucena4, Nasser Jazdi5, Vicente Ferreira de Lucena Junior6,7,8.
Abstract
This paper presents an intelligent system designed to increase the treatment adherence of hypertensive patients. The architecture was developed to allow communication among patients, physicians, and families to determine each patient's rate assertion of medication intake time and their self-monitoring of blood pressure. Concerning the medication schedule, the system is designed to follow a predefined prescription, adapting itself to undesired events, such as mistakenly taking medication or forgetting to take medication on time. When covering the blood pressure measurement, it incorporates best medical practices, registering the actual values in recommended frequency and form, trying to avoid the known "white-coat effect." We assume that taking medicine precisely and measuring blood pressure correctly may lead to good adherence to the treatment. The system uses commercial consumer electronic devices and can be replicated in any home equipped with a standard personal computer and Internet access. The resulting architecture has four layers. The first is responsible for adding electronic devices that typically exist in today's homes to the system. The second is a preprocessing layer that filters the data generated from the patient's behavior. The third is a reasoning layer that decides how to act based on the patient's activities observed. Finally, the fourth layer creates messages that should drive the reactions of all involved actors. The reasoning layer takes into consideration the patient's schedule and medication-taking activity data and uses implicit algorithms based on the J48, RepTree, and RandomTree decision tree models to infer the adherence. The algorithms were first adjusted using one academic machine learning and data mining tool. The system communicates with users through smartphones (anytime and anywhere) and smart TVs (in the patient's home) by using the 3G/4G and WiFi infrastructure. It interacts automatically through social networks with doctors and relatives when changes or mistakes in medication intake and blood pressure mean values are detected. By associating the blood pressure data with the history of medication intake, our system can indicate the treatment adherence and help patients to achieve better treatment results. Comparisons with similar research were made, highlighting our findings.Entities:
Keywords: ambient intelligence; assisted living; health information management; medical expert systems; medical treatment; smart homes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31635394 PMCID: PMC6832274 DOI: 10.3390/s19204539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Home health monitoring solutions.1.
| Proposed Approaches | Overview of Main Characteristics | Literature |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Homes | Smart home infrastructure with strategically positioned sensors for patient monitoring and improvement of medication adherence. | [ |
| Based on television communication and an electronic medicine cabinet, MHS provides adaptive services for patient monitoring. | [ | |
| Personalized home care system integrating wireless sensors, smartphones, webservers, and IP webcams for patient telemonitoring. | [ | |
| Mobile devices and applications | A health telemonitoring system prototype incorporates an Android smartphone, acting as a gateway between a set of wireless medical sensors and a data server. | [ |
| Data security in Android-based devices used for telemedicine approaches is addressed. | [ | |
| A schedule programmable blister card holder device reminds the patient about medicine intake with sound signals. A light signal of different colors indicates the level of medication adherence. | [ | |
| Mobile application with a conversational interface improving patient education and informing both patient and health caretakers about medication schedules, intake, side effects, and food interactions, among others. | [ | |
| Wearable devices | A smartwatch with embedded movement sensors detects patient behavior as indicators for medication intake. | [ |
| Machine learning algorithms are used to detect natural movements provided by a wearable wristband sensor as indicators of the medication intake activities. | [ | |
| A shirt with an array of embedded sensors connected to a central processing unit continuously monitors physiological data of the patient. | [ | |
| Ingestible sensors | An integrated circuit microsensor ingested with the medication gives real-time information about the treatment adherence along with physiologic parameters to learn the body response to the drug. | [ |
| Description of an in vivo communication system between a microsensor embedded in the medication and a patch receiver on the patient skin. Data are available to the involved persons via mobile and Web interfaces. | [ | |
| Implantable sensor | A membrane-type sensor is described as continuous blood pressure monitoring. | [ |
1 Health monitoring solutions are organized from less invasive to more invasive.
Figure 1Overview of the system. The scenery is divided into two parts, the smart home and the medical office; they are connected by the cloud infrastructure.
Figure 2System architecture proposed to process data and send social network messages. There are four layers, which are responsible for data gathering, analysis, decision making, and messaging.
Dataset sample from closing and opening the doors.
| Action | Date | Time | Latitude | Longitude | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 open | 04/21/2019 | 07:42:32 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.90 |
| D1 close | 04/21/2019 | 07:42:00 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.83 |
| D2 open | 04/21/2019 | 08:11:06 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.83 |
| D2 close | 04/21/2019 | 08:13:16 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.83 |
| D1 open | 04/21/2019 | 07:50:00 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.83 |
| D1 close | 04/21/2019 | 07:50:35 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.83 |
| D2 open | 04/21/2019 | 16:00:00 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.83 |
| D2 close | 04/21/2019 | 16:02:00 | −3.0878703 | −59.9638596 | 0.81 |
Sample from electronic prescription database.
| Medicine | Dosage in Milligrams | Scheduled Time | Ingestion Time | Apps Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine 1 | 12.5 | 08:00:00 | 08:00:00 | True |
| Medicine 2 | 25 | 09:00:00 | 09:00:00 | True |
| Medicine 3 | 25 | 08:00:00 | 08:00:00 | True |
| Medicine 3 | 50 | 08:00:00 | null | False |
| Medicine 4 | 1.5 | 10:00:00 | 10:00:00 | True |
| Medicine 4 | 1.5 | 10:00:00 | 11:00:00 | True |
| Medicine 4 | 1.5 | 10:00:00 | null | False |
Figure 3Generic decision tree algorithm.
Figure 4Medicine cabinet system and system log.
Figure 5Smart TV warning for medication-intake example.
Figure 6Warning and message data in XML format.
Figure 7Mobile website integrated with Twitter.
Figure 8Decision tree from the J48 model.
Figure 9Decision-making system log.
Figure 10Illustration of the commercial blood pressure meter utilized.
Interpretation of tp, tn, fp, and fn.
| Predicted Value | Took Medicine Correctly | Did Not Take Medicine Correctly |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results for algorithms tested.
| Algorithm | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J48 | 95.10 | 92.07 | 97.40 | 0.90 |
| RandomTree | 91.50 | 87.08 | 94.70 | 0.83 |
| RepTree | 98.20 | 87.08 | 92.30 | 0.81 |
Comparison of the presented work with similar works.
| Comparison Group | Subdivided In | Compared Related Work | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leijdekkers 2007 [ | De Bleser 2010 [ | Tang 2011 [ | DiCarlo 2012 [ | Varshney 2013 [ | Tschanz 2018 [ | This Work | ||
| Characteristics of the System | Protocols | Mix | BT | Mix | Mix | Mix | Mix | Mix |
| Types of Devices | C | D | C | D | C | C | C | |
| Range of Usage | OD | HL | HL | HL | HL | OD | OD | |
| Specific Disease | GD | GD | GD | GD | GD | GD | SD | |
| Number of Patients | LG | SG | SG | SG | SG | SG | SG | |
| Installation Needs | Special Devices | ND | HD | MD | HD | MD | ND | MD |
| Installation Adaption | MA | MA | MA | HD | HD | ND | MA | |
| Expected Costs | HC | HC | MC | HC | HC | SC | MC | |
| Relation to Patients | Ease of Use | M | M | E | E | E | E | E |
| Invasiveness | MI | NI | NI | HI | MI | NI | NI | |
| Accuracy | Detecting Events | A | A | SA | A | A | SA | A |
| Generating Events | SA | M | A | A | A | A | A | |
| Determining Adherence | na | na | A | A | A | SA | A | |
| Feedback to Users | Own Patients | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Relatives and Caregivers | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Smartness of the System | Detect Medicine Intake | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | Y |
| Medicine Identification | N | N | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | |
| Real-time Scheduling | na | FS | FS | FS | FS | AS | AS | |
| Measuring Vital Signals | SA | na | na | na | na | na | SA | |
| Adherence to Treatment | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Treatment of Specific Disease | na | na | G | G | G | G | F | |
na: information not available. The abbreviations are detailed in Section 5.1.