Literature DB >> 19091393

Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.

A J Stanley1, D Ashley, H R Dalton, C Mowat, D R Gaya, E Thompson, U Warshow, M Groome, A Cahill, G Benson, O Blatchford, W Murray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage is a frequent reason for hospital admission. Although most risk scoring systems for this disorder incorporate endoscopic findings, the Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score (GBS) is based on simple clinical and laboratory variables; a score of 0 identifies low-risk patients who might be suitable for outpatient management. We aimed to evaluate the GBS then assess the effect of a protocol based on this score for non-admission of low-risk individuals.
METHODS: Our study was undertaken at four hospitals in the UK. We calculated GBS and admission (pre-endoscopy) and full (post-endoscopy) Rockall scores for consecutive patients presenting with upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. With receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we compared the ability of these scores to predict either need for clinical intervention or death. We then prospectively assessed at two hospitals the introduction of GBS scoring to avoid admission of low-risk patients.
FINDINGS: Of 676 people presenting with upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage, we identified 105 (16%) who scored 0 on the GBS. For prediction of need for intervention or death, GBS (area under ROC curve 0.90 [95% CI 0.88-0.93]) was superior to full Rockall score (0.81 [0.77-0.84]), which in turn was better than the admission Rockall score (0.70 [0.65-0.75]). When introduced into clinical practice, 123 patients (22%) with upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage were classified as low risk, of whom 84 (68%) were managed as outpatients without adverse events. The proportion of individuals with this condition admitted to hospital also fell (96% to 71%, p<0.00001).
INTERPRETATION: The GBS identifies many patients presenting to general hospitals with upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage who can be managed safely as outpatients. This score reduces admissions for this condition, allowing more appropriate use of in-patient resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19091393     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61769-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  68 in total

1.  Prediction of bleeding etiology: the clinician is vindicated!

Authors:  Stephen E Congly; Alexander I Aspinall
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Endoscopy: Risk assessment in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  A clinical guide to using intravenous proton-pump inhibitors in reflux and peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Sandy H Pang; David Y Graham
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  Glasgow Blatchford Score and risk stratifications in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed: can we extend this to 2 for urgent outpatient management?

Authors:  Kelly Chatten; Huw Purssell; Ashwini Kumar Banerjee; Stephanie Soteriadou; Yeng Ang
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?

Authors:  Sara Monteiro; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Joana Magalhães; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

6.  Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease: Causes, Characteristics and Factors Associated with Need for Endoscopic Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Syed Mudassir Laeeq; Abbas Ali Tasneem; Farina M Hanif; Nasir Hassan Luck; Rajesh Mandhwani; Rajesh Wadhva
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2017-06-30

7.  Etiology and adverse outcome predictors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 589 patients in Nepal.

Authors:  Umid Kumar Shrestha; Subash Sapkota
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dennis Shung; Michael Simonov; Mark Gentry; Benjamin Au; Loren Laine
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Recent advances in peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Ian Lp Beales
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-05-28

10.  The cost-effectiveness analysis of video capsule endoscopy compared to other strategies to manage acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the ED.

Authors:  Andrew C Meltzer; Michael J Ward; Ian M Gralnek; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.