Anne F Peery1, Temitope O Keku2, Joseph A Galanko2, Robert S Sandler2. 1. University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: anne_peery@med.unc.edu. 2. University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prevalence of diverticulosis differs with demographic features of patients, but evidence is limited. Well-defined demographic studies are necessary to understand diverticulosis biology. We estimated the prevalence of diverticulosis among patients of different ages, sexes, and races and ethnicities and calculated odds ratios. DESIGN: Using data from an endoscopic database, we identified 271,181 colonoscopy procedures performed from 2000 through 2012 at 107 sites in the United States. Our analysis included individuals 40 years and older who underwent colonoscopy examination for average-risk screening. The outcome was any reported diverticulosis on colonoscopy. Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI values, adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: The prevalence of diverticulosis increased with age in men and women of all races and ethnicities. Women 40-49 years old had significantly lower odds of any diverticulosis (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) compared with men 40-49 years old, after adjustment. The strength of this association decreased with age. Compared with non-Hispanic white individuals, non-Hispanic black individuals (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.83) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.35-0.41) had lower odds of any diverticulosis. However, non-Hispanic black individuals (OR, 1.53, 95% CI, 1.44-1.62) had increased odds of any proximal diverticulosis, whereas Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.67-3.66) had increased odds of only proximal diverticulosis. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from 271,181 colonoscopy procedures, diverticulosis was less prevalent in women compared with men in the same age groups, indicating that sex hormones might affect pathogenesis. Differences in the odds of diverticulosis by race and ethnicity indicate a genetic contribution to risk.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prevalence of diverticulosis differs with demographic features of patients, but evidence is limited. Well-defined demographic studies are necessary to understand diverticulosis biology. We estimated the prevalence of diverticulosis among patients of different ages, sexes, and races and ethnicities and calculated odds ratios. DESIGN: Using data from an endoscopic database, we identified 271,181 colonoscopy procedures performed from 2000 through 2012 at 107 sites in the United States. Our analysis included individuals 40 years and older who underwent colonoscopy examination for average-risk screening. The outcome was any reported diverticulosis on colonoscopy. Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI values, adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: The prevalence of diverticulosis increased with age in men and women of all races and ethnicities. Women 40-49 years old had significantly lower odds of any diverticulosis (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) compared with men 40-49 years old, after adjustment. The strength of this association decreased with age. Compared with non-Hispanic white individuals, non-Hispanic black individuals (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.83) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.35-0.41) had lower odds of any diverticulosis. However, non-Hispanic black individuals (OR, 1.53, 95% CI, 1.44-1.62) had increased odds of any proximal diverticulosis, whereas Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.67-3.66) had increased odds of only proximal diverticulosis. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from 271,181 colonoscopy procedures, diverticulosis was less prevalent in women compared with men in the same age groups, indicating that sex hormones might affect pathogenesis. Differences in the odds of diverticulosis by race and ethnicity indicate a genetic contribution to risk.
Authors: Anne F Peery; Seth D Crockett; Caitlin C Murphy; Jennifer L Lund; Evan S Dellon; J Lucas Williams; Elizabeth T Jensen; Nicholas J Shaheen; Alfred S Barritt; Sarah R Lieber; Bharati Kochar; Edward L Barnes; Y Claire Fan; Virginia Pate; Joseph Galanko; Todd H Baron; Robert S Sandler Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Anne F Peery; Tope O Keku; Christopher F Martin; Swathi Eluri; Thomas Runge; Joseph A Galanko; Robert S Sandler Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Anne F Peery; Alexander Keil; Katherine Jicha; Joseph A Galanko; Robert S Sandler Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Antonio Altadill; Noemí Eiró; Luis Ovidio González; Sara Junquera; José Manuel González-Quintana; María Rosario Sánchez; Alejandro Andicoechea; Cristina Saro; Luis Rodrigo; Francisco José Vizoso Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Matthew D Moravec; Glenn M Eisen; Dawn Peters; Cynthia D Morris Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lillias H Maguire; Samuel K Handelman; Xiaomeng Du; Yanhua Chen; Tune H Pers; Elizabeth K Speliotes Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 38.330