| Literature DB >> 31634353 |
Trung T Trinh1, Karoline Assig2, Quyen T L Tran1, André Goehler3, Linh N H Bui1, Claudia Wiede3, Bettina Folli2, Sabine Lichtenegger2, Tinh T Nguyen1, Gabriel E Wagner2, Christian Kohler3, Ivo Steinmetz2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Isolation of the soil bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei from tropical environments is important to generate a global risk map for man and animals to acquire the infectious disease melioidosis. There is increasing evidence, that the currently recommended soil culture protocol using threonine-basal salt solution with colistin (TBSS-C50) for enrichment of B. pseudomallei and Ashdown agar for subsequent subculture lacks sensitivity. We therefore investigated, if the otherwise rarely encountered erythritol catabolism of B. pseudomallei might be exploited to improve isolation of this bacterium from soil. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31634353 PMCID: PMC6822774 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Bacterial strains.
| Strain | Species | Source and Origin |
|---|---|---|
| K9624 | Human, Thailand | |
| E8 | Soil, Thailand | |
| E212 | Soil, Thailand | |
| 770429 | Soil Niger | |
| NCTC4846 | Monkey, Singapore | |
| NCTC8016 | Sheep, Australia | |
| PITT521 | Human, Pakistan | |
| MK441 | Monkey, Philippines | |
| M1831 | Monkey, Indonesia | |
| NCTC10276 | Human, Bangladesh | |
| NCTC1688 | Rat, Malaysia | |
| NCTC7383 | Human, Burma | |
| E264 | Soil, Thailand | |
| E27 | Soil, Thailand | |
| E201 | Soil, Thailand | |
| E232 | Soil, Thailand | |
| R-15274 | Human, Germany | |
| LMG7000 | Human, Sweden | |
| LMG14291 | Human, Belgium | |
| R-15280 | Human, Germany | |
| R-15281 | Human, Germany | |
| LMG6889 | ||
| 187550 | Human, Germany | |
| K56-2 | Human, Canada | |
| H111 WT7100 | Human, Germany |
Fig 1Growth of Burkholderia pseudomallei and other soil- dwelling bacteria in TBSS-C50 and erythritol medium (EM).
Different B. pseudomallei and several other soil-dwelling bacterial strains were cultivated for 144h at 40°C in TBSS-C50, EM or EM without colistin. Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the absorbance of the cultures at 580nm hourly. (A) Growth of B. pseudomallei strains in TBSS-C50. In the interest of clarity, only the isolates K9624, E8 and NCTC 7383 mentioned in the text are specifically labelled. The remaining nine tested isolates are listed in Table 1. (B) Growth of B. pseudomallei strains in EM. (C) Growth of non- B. pseudomallei strains in TBSS-C50. (D) Growth of non- B. pseudomallei strains in EM medium without colistin. Each growth curve is representative of two independent experiments with similar results. Each experiment was conducted in technical duplicates.
Fig 2Enrichment of B. pseudomallei from soil samples using different culture conditions.
Eighty soil samples collected from 16 rice paddies in different parts of Vietnam were subjected to eight different culture conditions using either TBSS-C50 or EM in single step cultures (48h or 144h) or in two step cultures with both media in various combinations (48h plus 96h) as indicated. B. pseudomallei growth was assessed by B. pseudomallei-specific qPCR at the end of each incubation of those 640 cultures. Detectable qPCR cycle threshold (C) values with corresponding medians of 51 soil samples cultured in different enrichment methods are plotted in the graph. Each dot represents a single sample. The total numbers of qPCR-positive samples for each culture condition are shown below the corresponding dots above the abscissa. Significance analyses between the C values were performed using the Friedman´s test with a C value of 39 designated to qPCR-negative supernatants (*p<0.05.; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0,0001).
Fig 3Impact of the various enrichment methods on the number of B. pseudomallei culture positive samples on Ashdown agar.
All supernatants of the 51 samples with a positive qPCR signal in at least one of the enrichments (408 supernatants) were subcultured on Ashdown agar. The percentage of Ashdown agar culture-positive enrichments among all 51 samples is shown as grey bars for each culture condition. The total number of B. pseudomallei culture-positive samples in the respective culture condition is written above the corresponding bar. Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher's exact test (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ****p<0,0001, p* = 0.067).
Fig 4Impact of the various enrichment methods on the B. pseudomallei load and subsequent recovery on Ashdown agar in single samples.
From 80 soil samples incubated under eight different culture conditions using TBSS-C50 and the erythritol containing EM broth, 51 soil samples gave a positive qPCR signal in at least one enrichment. All supernatants of the different culture conditions from these 51 soil samples were subcultured on Ashdown agar at the end of the respective incubation time. Dotted vertical lines frame the soil samples of the same rice field. A single graph combines the data of all soil samples cultured under one respective culture condition. Colony counts of B. pseudomallei are log10-transformed and plotted as bars (refer to left Y axis). Counts were calculated as geometric means of duplicates cultured from each supernatant. Corresponding cycle threshold (C) values for each culture condition are visualized as dots within the bars (right Y axis).