Literature DB >> 31633320

Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.

Vincenzo Tosco1, Riccardo Monterubbianesi2, Giulia Orilisi2, Maurizio Procaccini2, Simone Grandini3, Angelo Putignano2, Giovanna Orsini2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Finishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite.
METHODS: Twelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra- Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing.
RESULTS: Regarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (p<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surfaceroughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was used for statistical evaluations (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31633320     DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Stomatol        ISSN: 0026-4970


  5 in total

1.  Surface evaluations of a nanocomposite after different finishing and polishing systems for anterior and posterior restorations.

Authors:  Riccardo Monterubbianesi; Vincenzo Tosco; Giulia Orilisi; Simone Grandini; Giovanna Orsini; Angelo Putignano
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.893

2.  Effect of Chemical and Mechanical Degradation on Surface Roughness, Topography, Gloss, and Polish Retention of Three Composites Polished with Five Polishing Systems.

Authors:  Fatemeh Farzaneh; Mahshid Mohammadi-Bassir; Mohammad Bagher Rezvani; Fahimeh Dehestani Ardakani
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-11-01

3.  Attitudes towards Antibiotic Prescription and Antimicrobial Resistance Awareness among Italian Dentists: What Are the Milestones?

Authors:  Francesco D'Ambrosio; Federica Di Spirito; Alessandra Amato; Mario Caggiano; Roberto Lo Giudice; Stefano Martina
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-21

4.  Comparative Analysis of Abrasive Materials and Polishing System on the Surface Roughness of Heat-Polymerized Acrylic Resins.

Authors:  Stanley Chibuzor Onwubu; Phumlane Selby Mdluli
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  Micro-computed tomography for assessing the internal and external voids of bulk-fill composite restorations: A technical report.

Authors:  Vincenzo Tosco; Riccardo Monterubbianesi; Michele Furlani; Alessandra Giuliani; Angelo Putignano; Giovanna Orsini
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-06-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.