The highest reported efficiencies of metal halide perovskite (MHP) solar cells are all based on mixed perovskites, such as (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1-x Br x )3. Despite demonstrated structural changes induced by light soaking, it is unclear how the charge carrier dynamics are affected across this entire material family. Here, various (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1-x Br x )3 perovskite films are light-soaked in nitrogen, and changes in optoelectronic properties are investigated through time-resolved microwave conductivity (TRMC) and optical and structural techniques. To fit the TRMC decay kinetics obtained for pristine (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1-x Br x )3 for various excitation densities, additional shallow states have to be included, which are not required for describing TRMC traces of single-cation MHPs. These shallow states can, independently of x, be removed by light soaking, which leads to a reduction in the imbalance between the diffusional motion of electrons and holes. We interpret the shallow states as a result of initially well-intermixed halide distributions, which upon light soaking segregate into domains with distinct band gaps.
The highest reported efficiencies of metal halide perovskite (MHP) solar cells are all based on mixed perovskites, such as (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1-x Br x )3. Despite demonstrated structural changes induced by light soaking, it is unclear how the charge carrier dynamics are affected across this entire material family. Here, various (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1-x Br x )3 perovskite films are light-soaked in nitrogen, and changes in optoelectronic properties are investigated through time-resolved microwave conductivity (TRMC) and optical and structural techniques. To fit the TRMC decay kinetics obtained for pristine (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1-x Br x )3 for various excitation densities, additional shallow states have to be included, which are not required for describing TRMC traces of single-cation MHPs. These shallow states can, independently of x, be removed by light soaking, which leads to a reduction in the imbalance between the diffusional motion of electrons and holes. We interpret the shallow states as a result of initially well-intermixed halide distributions, which upon light soaking segregate into domains with distinct band gaps.
Perovskite
solar cells have
achieved the fastest increase in power conversion efficiencies (PCEs)
in solar cell research history, exceeding now 24%.[1,2] Recent
records of perovskite solar cells are all based on mixed cation–mixed
halide perovskites (MCMHPs).[2,3] The advantages of MCMHPs
in comparison with single-cation perovskites are the tunable band
gaps and more stable, black phase,[4,5] while the main
drawback of these perovskites is related to light-induced phase segregation.[6,7] Several LS studies on MCMHP solar cells have been carried out, which
revealed a variety of changes in Voc, Isc, and FF.[4,8−14] To explain the changes in device performance, various groups studied
structural and optical changes in bare MHP layers induced by light
soaking (LS). Initially, phase segregation, which leads to I-rich
and Br-rich domains, was reported in both MAPb(I1–Br)3 and
FAPb(I1–Br)3 as determined by either photoluminescence (PL)
emission,[7,15−17] differential absorption
spectra,[13] or XRD.[18−20] The addition
of Cs stabilizes (FA,MA)Pb(I1–Br)34 and increases
the PCE output.[21] However, from the work
by Tress et al.,[8] phase segregation still
occurs in (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1–Br)3, as concluded from a wavelength
shift in PL upon LS. Recent work using micro- and nanofocus XRD techniques
from Jones et al. revealed structural inhomogeneity in both MCMHP
and MAPbI3.[22] Tsai et al. found
local lattice distortion in (FA,MA,Cs)PbI3 and attributed
the improvement in device performance upon LS to interface modification
and release of local distortion.[23]The studies above relate structural inhomogeneity to the device
performance. However, how the charge carriers in MCMHPs are affected
by this structural change is less well studied. In this work, we use
optical and time-resolved microwave conductivity (TRMC)[24−27] techniques to investigate the influence of LS on charge carrier
dynamics in various (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 with x ranging from 0 to 1.
Surprisingly, in contrast to most other studied MHPs, mathematical
analysis of the decay kinetics of the pristine layers with 0.2 ≤ x ≤ 0.8 requires the presence of shallow states.[28] We link these states to a mostly well intermixed
halide distribution, leading to a varying energy landscape in the
bulk. Interestingly, these shallow states are seemingly removed upon
LS, which we attribute to the conversion of these states into distinct
iodide-rich, low-band-gap domains. The fact that the layers return
to their original structure after storage in the dark for over 1 week
reveals that for these MCMHPs the presence of shallow states (i.e.,
well intermixed halide distributions) is thermodynamically the most
stable conformation.Throughout this work, we studied bare (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 films
with x varying between 0 and 1 deposited by spin-coating
on quartz substrates
without any exposure to air or moisture. SEM images of these layers
are provided in Figure S1, showing similar
grain sizes for all values of x, in agreement with
the reported better crystallization of MCMHPs than single-cation analogues.[4] For a number of samples, XRD spectra are provided
in Figure S2, showing the specific features
of the perovskite structure. LS was accomplished by illumination for
30 min with a white light LED with an intensity equivalent to AM1.5
in N2. To study the structural reorganization in (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 upon
LS, we first measured the absorptance spectra, as shown in Figure , and detailed band-edge
information from photothermal deflection spectroscopy (PDS) (Figure S3a). In Figure b,c, only a subtle shift of the band-edge
to longer wavelengths for x = 0.4 and 0.6 upon LS
is visible, even if the LS treatment is prolonged to overnight exposure.
The spectra of nonmixed halides (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)PbI3 and (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)PbBr3 (Figure a,d) do not show these optical changes, indicating
that no structural reorganization occurs upon LS. In contrast, the
substantial shift in absorption onset of the single-cation MAPb(I0.6Br0.4)3 shown in Figure S3b supports the idea that the structural reorganization
in the triple-cation perovskite upon LS is significantly slower than
that in monocation perovskites, in line with previous observations.[29]
Figure 1
Absorptance spectra before and after LS in N2 for (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 with x = 0, 0.4, 0.6, and 1. The blue arrows
indicate the shift
due to the LS. For comparison, the effect of LS on MAPb(I0.6Br0.4)3 is shown in Figure S3b. The insets are magnifications to show the subtle shift
due to the LS.
Absorptance spectra before and after LS in N2 for (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 with x = 0, 0.4, 0.6, and 1. The blue arrows
indicate the shift
due to the LS. For comparison, the effect of LS on MAPb(I0.6Br0.4)3 is shown in Figure S3b. The insets are magnifications to show the subtle shift
due to the LS.Figure collects
the corresponding PL spectra upon 532 nm CW laser excitation for the
same set of MHPs. Figure b shows that the PL emission at 715 nm of (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 gradually reduces and a second band appears at 760
nm upon LS. In Figure c, similar gradual PL changes for x = 0.6 upon LS
are observed. Despite significant differences in the initial band
gaps of x = 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 (Figure S4a), the PL emission wavelengths upon LS are all close
to that of x = 0.2 (shown in Figure S4b), in agreement with previous studies on similar
mixed MHPs.[16,17,30−33] Note that this second PL emission wavelength is still ∼50
nm blue shifted with respect to that of (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)PbI3, excluding the formation of bromide-free
regions (see Figure a). Interestingly, the total PL intensity of both PL bands remains
within a factor of 2 constant for x = 0.4 and 0.6,
which is in large contrast with MHPs light soaked under humid conditions.[25,34] The observed PL changes are different from those of single-cation
MHPs like MAPb(I1–Br)3 and FAPb(I1–Br)3. In MAPb(I1–Br)3, with x = 0.4 or 0.6, a short illumination
period leads to a clear PL shift in combination with formation of
a shorter-wavelength peak,[7] which are attributed
to I-rich and Br-enriched domains, respectively, as reported previously.[18,33] In order to find out if our observed changes in MCMHP are driven
by the presence of a mixture of iodide and bromide, we measured the
PL of (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)PbI3 and (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)PbBr3 upon LS, as shown in Figures a and 1d. The decrease in PL
intensity is comparable to that observed in single-cation MHPs.[35] However, because the maximum PL intensity for
these monocation MHPs remains at the same wavelength, we conclude
that the structural reorganization is propelled by the halide mixture.
However, from the profound changes between single-cation and multication
perovskites upon LS, we conclude that the multication system slows
down the phase segregation tremendously, in line with previous observations.[35]
Figure 2
PL spectra of (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 with x = 0, 0.4, 0.6,
and 1
in time upon LS in N2 (532 nm laser, ∼60 mW/cm2)
PL spectra of (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 with x = 0, 0.4, 0.6,
and 1
in time upon LS in N2 (532 nm laser, ∼60 mW/cm2)To find out whether the bulk crystalline
structure is affected
by LS, we performed XRD measurements before and after LS of the x = 0.4 sample, shown in Figure S2. There are no shifts or additional peaks visible in the XRD pattern
upon LS, confirming that the bulk crystalline structure is not affected
and that the size and/or proportion of the iodide-enriched domains
are far lower and not detectable in these experiments in comparison
to the bulk. The amount of PbI2 is not affected by the
LS, as evidenced in Figure S2. The change
in XRD patterns reported for single-cation MHPs supports the idea
that the MCMHPs are relatively more stable against LS.[33,36]To study the effect of LS on the charge carrier dynamics in
(FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 with
0 ≤ x ≤ 1, we carried out TRMC measurements
and recorded traces before and after the LS treatment, as shown in Figure . For comparison,
TRMC traces for a single-cation perovskite, i.e., MAPb(I0.6Br0.4)3, are also included. TRMC results for x = 0.2 and 0.8 are provided in Figure S5. The transients show a rapid rise due to formation of excess
charge carriers by the laser pulse, while the decay of the signal
represents how mobile carriers get immobilized or undergo recombination.
The excitation densities range from 1014 to 1016 cm–3, calculated from the laser intensity, the
sample thickness, and the fraction of absorbed light at the excitation
wavelength. To facilitate comparison of traces acquired using different
intensities, the photoconductance signals are normalized to the number
of absorbed photons. The first important observation is that upon
LS the charge carrier lifetimes become shorter for, in particular,
the samples with 0.4 ≤ x ≤ 0.6. For
the latter samples and to a lesser extent x = 0.2
and 0.8, the TRMC tails exhibit the same slope independent of the
laser intensity in this log–linear representation. This feature
is not observed for MHPs with only a single halide, i.e., (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)PbI3 and
(FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05)PbBr3 (Figure b,e, left
panels), and also for MHPs with only a single cation, MAPb(I0.6Br0.4)3 (Figure a, left panel). This implies that the occurrence of
these TRMC tails is somehow linked to the presence of both mixed cations
and mixed halides. Interestingly, this behavior is absent after 30
min of LS, as clearly visible in the right panels of Figure . Much longer LS treatments
(17 h) show essentially the same effect, as shown in Figure S6. The samples show almost complete recovery after
storage in the glovebox in the dark for over 1 week, especially regarding
the tails, as shown in Figure S7.
Figure 3
TRMC traces of MAPb(I0.6Br0.4)3 (a) and (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 for (b) x = 0,
(c) 0.4, (d) 0.6, and (e) 1 before (left panels)
and after (right) LS. The analogues x = 0.2 and 0.8
are shown for comparison in Figure S5.
Solid lines are the experimental traces, and dashed lines are the
results of the fits. Note that panel (e) has a different time scale
of 1 μs. The samples were all excited by laser pulses at 500
nm with excitation intensities leading to charge carrier densities
ranging from 1014 to 1016 cm–3, and specific densities are given in the annotations.
TRMC traces of MAPb(I0.6Br0.4)3 (a) and (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 for (b) x = 0,
(c) 0.4, (d) 0.6, and (e) 1 before (left panels)
and after (right) LS. The analogues x = 0.2 and 0.8
are shown for comparison in Figure S5.
Solid lines are the experimental traces, and dashed lines are the
results of the fits. Note that panel (e) has a different time scale
of 1 μs. The samples were all excited by laser pulses at 500
nm with excitation intensities leading to charge carrier densities
ranging from 1014 to 1016 cm–3, and specific densities are given in the annotations.In order to extract kinetic parameters from the TRMC results,
we
apply a kinetic model recently reported by Hutter et al.[26] that successfully described the formation and
decay of the light-induced charge carriers in MAPbI3 and
other MHPs.[37−41] In that model, two decay pathways for charge carriers were included:
band-to-band recombination, with rate constant k2, and trap-mediated recombination. However, that model was
not capable of describing the kinetics of the pristine MHMCPs adequately,
implying that at least one additional or different decay pathway is
required. Previously, a similar transient behavior was observed for
charge carriers in FAPbI3 at low temperatures.[42] Moreover, Azulay and co-workers recently evoked
the presence of shallow states to explain their scanning tunneling
results.[28] Therefore, we included in our
kinetic model an additional pathway, in which mobile charges are temporarily
immobilized with a first-order rate constant ks and thermally released with kr, as is depicted in Figure a. Note that immobilized carriers[36] do not contribute to the conductance during the period in which
they reside in these states. This additional pathway could be substantiated
by shallow defect states but also by, e.g., low crystalline domains
in which carriers have a reduced mobility. The corresponding set of
differential equations and a more complete description of our fitting
procedure are provided in the Supporting Information (eqs S1–S4). The occupancy of these shallow
states is expected to be heavily temperature dependent. The lower
the temperature, the more charges that will reside in these shallow
states, preventing them from recombining, which would translate into
longer charge carrier lifetimes. Note that with TRMC we probe both
electrons and holes, weighed with their respective mobility. We measured x = 0.4 at different temperatures, as shown in Figure b, showing a gradually
smaller slope of the tails with lower temperatures. This is in line
with the idea that with lower temperatures one of the carriers remains
trapped for longer and longer periods, and with that, recombination
to the ground state is reduced.
Figure 4
(a) Kinetic model describing the charge
carrier dynamics in MHPs
with the following decay pathways: band-to-band recombination with
rate k2; deep trap-assisted recombination
with trapping rate kT and depopulation
rate kD; and immobilization in shallow
states with trapping rate ks and thermal
release rate kr. (b) Temperature-dependent
TRMC traces of sample x = 0.4 recorded at an excitation
density of 5.4 × 1014 cm–3.
(a) Kinetic model describing the charge
carrier dynamics in MHPs
with the following decay pathways: band-to-band recombination with
rate k2; deep trap-assisted recombination
with trapping rate kT and depopulation
rate kD; and immobilization in shallow
states with trapping rate ks and thermal
release rate kr. (b) Temperature-dependent
TRMC traces of sample x = 0.4 recorded at an excitation
density of 5.4 × 1014 cm–3.We applied the modified model to fit all of the
TRMC traces, and
results are added to Figures and S5, showing excellent agreement
between the model and data (see also Figure S8 for different representations). The extracted kinetic parameters
are listed in Table S1 and are also presented
in Figures and S9. Figure a shows the sum of mobilities, which reduces gradually
from around 66 cm2/(V s) for x = 0 to
33 cm2/(V s) for x = 1. This reduction
upon increasing Br content in (FA0.79MA0.15Cs0.06)Pb(I1–Br)3 is in line with that reported for (FA0.83Cs0.17)Pb(I1–Br)3.[24,43] From Figure b, one
can see that before LS the band-to-band recombination rate, k2, increases gradually with Br content, which
is similar to that reported for FAPb(I1–Br)3 measurements.[15] Upon LS, k2 remains
approximately the same for x ≤ 0.4, while k2 increases for 0.6 ≤ x ≤ 1. Figure c shows a gradual increase in trapping and release rates by shallow
states with higher Br content. Most importantly, upon LS, both rates
decrease substantially, which implies that both carriers remain now
in the valence and conduction band and can recombine. The overall
effect is that the charge carrier lifetimes reduce especially for
higher intensities in combination with the disappearance of the parallel
tails. Important to note here is that the gradual change of the dynamic
parameters with x cannot be explained by the morphology
of the MCMHP layers because the grain sizes are rather similar, as
is clear from the SEM images shown in Figure S1.
Figure 5
(a) Sum of charge carrier mobilities, ∑μ, before (black
hollow triangles) and after (red solid circles) LS versus Br fraction.
(b) Band-to-band recombination rate, k2. (c) Trapping and escaping rates, ks and kr of the shallow states. (d) Diffusion
lengths of electrons and holes calculated from the lifetimes upon
excitation at 3 × 1014 cm–3 derived
from Figure S10.
(a) Sum of charge carrier mobilities, ∑μ, before (black
hollow triangles) and after (red solid circles) LS versus Br fraction.
(b) Band-to-band recombination rate, k2. (c) Trapping and escaping rates, ks and kr of the shallow states. (d) Diffusion
lengths of electrons and holes calculated from the lifetimes upon
excitation at 3 × 1014 cm–3 derived
from Figure S10.To picture the effect of the LS on the electronic properties of
the MCMHPs, we calculated the charge carrier diffusion lengths before
and after LS, as shown in Figure d. We note here that we assume that the material is
unintentionally p-doped; however, the opposite case is also possible.[44] These diffusion lengths are calculated on the
basis of the charge carrier mobilities given in Table S1 via the Einstein–Smoluchowski relation and
the lifetimes derived from the rate constants as shown in Figure S10 using a laser intensity leading to
an initial excitation density of 3 × 1014 cm–3. In particular, for (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1–Br)3 with x = 0.4, there is an imbalance between the diffusion of electrons
and holes because one of the carriers is temporarily immobilized.
It can be expected that in solar cells this imbalance gives rise to
additional space charge fields blocking efficient collection, and
in LEDs, this imbalance would be detrimental to the charge injection.
Upon LS, the shallow states vanish and the decay of electrons and
holes becomes almost identical (see Figure S10), and hence, the imbalance in diffusion lengths is largely diminished.
However, apart from this halide redistribution, in a complete cell
also, ion migration might occur upon LS, affecting the internal electric
field in the device and with that its performance.[45]To understand the origin of the shallow sub-band-gap
states and
the effect of the LS on the charge dynamics, we first consider the
facts that those states require the presence of both mixed cations
and mixed halides. We speculate that a nonuniform distribution of
cations and halides leads to intermixed shallow states, in line with
previous claims.[28] Consequently, a varying
energy landscape is created with shallow levels close to the band
edge. Correa-Baena et al. demonstrated recently that neither cations
nor halides are homogeneously spread over MCMHP films.[46] Furthermore, Rehman et al. reported that FAPb(I1–Br)3 with x between 0.3 and 0.5 are amorphous
in nature, and mobilities in those materials are lower than 2 cm2/(V s). Temporal localization of excess charge carriers in
such intermixed shallow states is fully consistent with the kinetic
model shown in Figure a by realizing that the long-lived TRMC signals originate from the
mobile counter charges.As has been argued previously by Hoke
et al., LS leads to reorganization
of the halides, resulting in local higher concentrations of iodide
atoms.[18] As suggested by Knight et al.[34] and Belisle et al.,[36] the mechanism of this reorganization process is mediated by the
localization of positive charges. Randomly moving iodide atoms cluster
near the positive charges, providing a thermodynamic driving force
to form iodide-rich domains. However, we conclude that for our (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1–Br)3 films this occurs at the intermixed shallow states. As a
result, we suggest that the shallow states of intermixed halides convert
into distinct iodide-rich, low-band-gap domains, as is evident from
our TRMC and optical data. Hence, this process is different than that
for the single-cation MHPs: although the formation of iodide domains
is accelerated by defects, these appear preferentially at the illuminated
site.[16,17] The conversion process induced by LS has
different effects on the optoelectronic properties depending on x: While for 0.2 ≤ x ≤ 0.4
found μ and k2 values remain constant,
for 0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.8, LS leads to a decrease
of μ and increasing k2 values. To
explain these observations, we note that these fitting parameters
are the results of treating the materials as homogeneous media. This
results in effective values for μ and k2. However, the low-band-gap, iodide-rich domains have a substantial
energetic offset with respect to the bulk: close to 0.3 eV for x = 0.6 as deduced from the PL data. Hence, upon optical
excitation of layers with 0.6 ≤ x ≤
0.8, the segregated domains may mediate fast, higher-order charge
carrier decay as excitations transfer to the lower-gap iodide-rich
domains. Finally, upon prolonged storage in the dark, the MCMHPs regain
their original thermodynamically most favorable structure probably
due to entropic reasons.[47] Thus, the shallow
states corresponding to intermixed halides are reformed, suggesting
that no motion of the cations is involved in the LS process.In this work, we studied how the dynamics of charge carriers change
upon LS in various (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1–Br)3 films by PL, optical
absorption, XRD, and TRMC. First, in such MCMHPs, decay pathways of
photoexcited charge carriers not only include recombination via band-to-band
and deep traps but also immobilization in and thermal escape from
shallow states independent of x. We speculate that
a nonuniform distribution of cations and halides in the (FA,MA,Cs)Pb(I1–Br)3 films could lead to these intermixed shallow states. The
shallow states cause imbalanced electron and hole diffusion lengths.
Second, by LS, these states convert into distinct iodide-rich, low-band-gap
domains. For LS samples with 0.2 ≤ x ≤
0.4, the shallow states are virtually absent, while the bulk properties
including the mobility and band-to-band recombination remain the same.
Only for samples with 0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.8
do these low-band-gap domains lead to enhanced higher-order recombination,
which will negatively affect the photovoltaic performance. Finally,
we suggest that by optimizing
the constituent ratios it is possible to further improve the mixed
perovskite solar cells by making the MCMHP film free of shallow states,
which induce the halide segregation.
Authors: Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Yanqi Luo; Thomas M Brenner; Jordan Snaider; Shijing Sun; Xueying Li; Mallory A Jensen; Noor Titan Putri Hartono; Lea Nienhaus; Sarah Wieghold; Jeremy R Poindexter; Shen Wang; Ying Shirley Meng; Ti Wang; Barry Lai; Martin V Holt; Zhonghou Cai; Moungi G Bawendi; Libai Huang; Tonio Buonassisi; David P Fenning Journal: Science Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Hsinhan Tsai; Reza Asadpour; Jean-Christophe Blancon; Constantinos C Stoumpos; Olivier Durand; Joseph W Strzalka; Bo Chen; Rafael Verduzco; Pulickel M Ajayan; Sergei Tretiak; Jacky Even; Muhammad Ashraf Alam; Mercouri G Kanatzidis; Wanyi Nie; Aditya D Mohite Journal: Science Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi; Zahra Andaji-Garmaroudi; Stefania Cacovich; Camille Stavrakas; Bertrand Philippe; Johannes M Richter; Mejd Alsari; Edward P Booker; Eline M Hutter; Andrew J Pearson; Samuele Lilliu; Tom J Savenije; Håkan Rensmo; Giorgio Divitini; Caterina Ducati; Richard H Friend; Samuel D Stranks Journal: Nature Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Eric T Hoke; Daniel J Slotcavage; Emma R Dohner; Andrea R Bowring; Hemamala I Karunadasa; Michael D McGehee Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Andrés F Gualdrón-Reyes; Seog Joon Yoon; Eva M Barea; Said Agouram; Vicente Muñoz-Sanjosé; Ángel M Meléndez; Martha E Niño-Gómez; Iván Mora-Seró Journal: ACS Energy Lett Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 23.101