OBJECTIVE: Despite significant recent efforts applied toward the development of efficacious therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) through exploration of GBM's genome and transcriptome, curative therapeutic strategies remain highly elusive. As such, novel and effective therapeutics are urgently required. In this study, the authors sought to explore the kinomic landscape of GBM from a previously underutilized approach (i.e., spatial heterogeneity), followed by validation of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) targeting according to this stepwise kinomic-based novel approach. METHODS: Twelve GBM tumor samples were obtained and characterized histopathologically from 2 patients with GBM. PamStation peptide-array analysis of these tissues was performed to measure the kinomic activity of each sample. The Ivy GBM database was then utilized to determine the intratumoral spatial localization of BTK activity by investigating the expression of BTK-related transcription factors (TFs) within tumors. Genetic inhibition of BTK family members through lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown was performed to determine their function in the core-like and edge-like GBM neurosphere models. Finally, the small-molecule inhibitor of BTK, ONO/GS-4059, which is currently under clinical investigation in nonbrain cancers, was applied for pharmacological inhibition of regionally specified newly established GBM edge and core neurosphere models. RESULTS: Kinomic investigation identified two major subclusters of GBM tissues from both patients exhibiting distinct profiles of kinase activity. Comparatively, in these spatially defined subgroups, BTK was the centric kinase differentially expressed. According to the Ivy GBM database, BTK-related TFs were highly expressed in the tumor core, but not in edge counterparts. Short hairpin RNA-mediated gene silencing of BTK in previously established edge- and core-like GBM neurospheres demonstrated increased apoptotic activity with predominance of the sub-G1 phase of core-like neurospheres compared to edge-like neurospheres. Lastly, pharmacological inhibition of BTK by ONO/GS-4059 resulted in growth inhibition of regionally derived GBM core cells and, to a lesser extent, their edge counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies significant heterogeneity in kinase activity both within and across distinct GBM tumors. The study findings indicate that BTK activity is elevated in the classically therapy-resistant GBM tumor core. Given these findings, targeting GBM's resistant core through BTK may potentially provide therapeutic benefit for patients with GBM.
OBJECTIVE: Despite significant recent efforts applied toward the development of efficacious therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) through exploration of GBM's genome and transcriptome, curative therapeutic strategies remain highly elusive. As such, novel and effective therapeutics are urgently required. In this study, the authors sought to explore the kinomic landscape of GBM from a previously underutilized approach (i.e., spatial heterogeneity), followed by validation of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) targeting according to this stepwise kinomic-based novel approach. METHODS: Twelve GBM tumor samples were obtained and characterized histopathologically from 2 patients with GBM. PamStation peptide-array analysis of these tissues was performed to measure the kinomic activity of each sample. The Ivy GBM database was then utilized to determine the intratumoral spatial localization of BTK activity by investigating the expression of BTK-related transcription factors (TFs) within tumors. Genetic inhibition of BTK family members through lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown was performed to determine their function in the core-like and edge-like GBM neurosphere models. Finally, the small-molecule inhibitor of BTK, ONO/GS-4059, which is currently under clinical investigation in nonbrain cancers, was applied for pharmacological inhibition of regionally specified newly established GBM edge and core neurosphere models. RESULTS: Kinomic investigation identified two major subclusters of GBM tissues from both patients exhibiting distinct profiles of kinase activity. Comparatively, in these spatially defined subgroups, BTK was the centric kinase differentially expressed. According to the Ivy GBM database, BTK-related TFs were highly expressed in the tumor core, but not in edge counterparts. Short hairpin RNA-mediated gene silencing of BTK in previously established edge- and core-like GBM neurospheres demonstrated increased apoptotic activity with predominance of the sub-G1 phase of core-like neurospheres compared to edge-like neurospheres. Lastly, pharmacological inhibition of BTK by ONO/GS-4059 resulted in growth inhibition of regionally derived GBM core cells and, to a lesser extent, their edge counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies significant heterogeneity in kinase activity both within and across distinct GBM tumors. The study findings indicate that BTK activity is elevated in the classically therapy-resistant GBM tumor core. Given these findings, targeting GBM's resistant core through BTK may potentially provide therapeutic benefit for patients with GBM.
Entities:
Keywords:
BTK; BTK = Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; CLL = chronic lymphocytic leukemia; EGF = epidermal growth factor; EGFR = endothelial growth factor receptor; FITC = fluorescein isothiocyanate; GAP = Glioblastoma Atlas Project; GBM = glioblastoma; GSC = glioma stemlike cell; IDH = isocitrate dehydrogenase; MCL = mantle cell lymphoma; ONO/GS-4059; PCA = principal component analysis; PDGFR = platelet-derived endothelial growth factor; PI = propidium iodide; PTK = protein tyrosine kinase; TF = transcription factor; UAB = University of Alabama at Birmingham; bFGF = basic fibroblast growth factor; glioblastoma; kinomics; oncology; protein kinase; shRNA = short hairpin RNA
Authors: V Goidts; J Bageritz; L Puccio; S Nakata; M Zapatka; S Barbus; G Toedt; B Campos; A Korshunov; S Momma; E Van Schaftingen; G Reifenberger; C Herold-Mende; P Lichter; B Radlwimmer Journal: Oncogene Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Anoop P Patel; Itay Tirosh; John J Trombetta; Alex K Shalek; Shawn M Gillespie; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Daniel P Cahill; Brian V Nahed; William T Curry; Robert L Martuza; David N Louis; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Mario L Suvà; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein Journal: Science Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Karla C S Queiroz; Rene A Tio; Clark J Zeebregts; Maarten F Bijlsma; Felix Zijlstra; Bahram Badlou; Marcel de Vries; Carmen V Ferreira; C Arnold Spek; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Farhad Rezaee Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2010-09-14 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: James C H Hardwick; Marije van Santen; Gijs R van den Brink; Sander J H van Deventer; Maikel P Peppelenbosch Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2004-02-19 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Michael L Wang; Simon Rule; Peter Martin; Andre Goy; Rebecca Auer; Brad S Kahl; Wojciech Jurczak; Ranjana H Advani; Jorge E Romaguera; Michael E Williams; Jacqueline C Barrientos; Ewa Chmielowska; John Radford; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Martin Dreyling; Wieslaw Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Peter Johnson; Stephen E Spurgeon; Lei Li; Liang Zhang; Kate Newberry; Zhishuo Ou; Nancy Cheng; Bingliang Fang; Jesse McGreivy; Fong Clow; Joseph J Buggy; Betty Y Chang; Darrin M Beaupre; Lori A Kunkel; Kristie A Blum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ralph B Puchalski; Nameeta Shah; Jeremy Miller; Rachel Dalley; Steve R Nomura; Jae-Guen Yoon; Kimberly A Smith; Michael Lankerovich; Darren Bertagnolli; Kris Bickley; Andrew F Boe; Krissy Brouner; Stephanie Butler; Shiella Caldejon; Mike Chapin; Suvro Datta; Nick Dee; Tsega Desta; Tim Dolbeare; Nadezhda Dotson; Amanda Ebbert; David Feng; Xu Feng; Michael Fisher; Garrett Gee; Jeff Goldy; Lindsey Gourley; Benjamin W Gregor; Guangyu Gu; Nika Hejazinia; John Hohmann; Parvinder Hothi; Robert Howard; Kevin Joines; Ali Kriedberg; Leonard Kuan; Chris Lau; Felix Lee; Hwahyung Lee; Tracy Lemon; Fuhui Long; Naveed Mastan; Erika Mott; Chantal Murthy; Kiet Ngo; Eric Olson; Melissa Reding; Zack Riley; David Rosen; David Sandman; Nadiya Shapovalova; Clifford R Slaughterbeck; Andrew Sodt; Graham Stockdale; Aaron Szafer; Wayne Wakeman; Paul E Wohnoutka; Steven J White; Don Marsh; Robert C Rostomily; Lydia Ng; Chinh Dang; Allan Jones; Bart Keogh; Haley R Gittleman; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Patrick J Cimino; Megha S Uppin; C Dirk Keene; Farrokh R Farrokhi; Justin D Lathia; Michael E Berens; Antonio Iavarone; Amy Bernard; Ed Lein; John W Phillips; Steven W Rostad; Charles Cobbs; Michael J Hawrylycz; Greg D Foltz Journal: Science Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sofian Al Shboul; Olimpia E Curran; Javier A Alfaro; Fiona Lickiss; Erisa Nita; Jacek Kowalski; Faris Naji; Rudolf Nenutil; Kathryn L Ball; Radovan Krejcir; Borivoj Vojtesek; Ted R Hupp; Paul M Brennan Journal: Life Sci Alliance Date: 2021-10-13
Authors: Abdelsattar M Omar; Maan T Khayat; Farid Ahmed; Yosra A Muhammad; Azizah M Malebari; Sara M Ibrahim; Mohammad I Khan; Dhaval K Shah; Wayne E Childers; Moustafa E El-Araby Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Frank D Eckerdt; Jonathan B Bell; Christopher Gonzalez; Michael S Oh; Ricardo E Perez; Candice Mazewski; Mariafausta Fischietti; Stewart Goldman; Ichiro Nakano; Leonidas C Platanias Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Christian T Stackhouse; Joshua C Anderson; Zongliang Yue; Thanh Nguyen; Nicholas J Eustace; Catherine P Langford; Jelai Wang; James R Rowland; Chuan Xing; Fady M Mikhail; Xiangqin Cui; Hasan Alrefai; Ryan E Bash; Kevin J Lee; Eddy S Yang; Anita B Hjelmeland; C Ryan Miller; Jake Y Chen; G Yancey Gillespie; Christopher D Willey Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2022-08-22