Kristan A Pierz1, Jessica R Lloyd2, Matthew J Solomito3, Phil Mack1, Sylvia Õunpuu4. 1. Center for Motion Analysis, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 399 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA; Department of Orthopaedics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 399 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. 2. Center for Motion Analysis, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 399 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. 3. Department of Research, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 399 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. 4. Center for Motion Analysis, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 399 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. Electronic address: Sounpuu@connecticutchildrens.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent clubfoot may seek intervention to address impairments that impact gait function. An understanding of these impairments and associated gait issues will provide valuable information about ongoing treatment requirements. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of impairments and associated gait deviations in children with recurrent clubfoot and to evaluate whether these findings differ depending on unilateral or bilateral presentation. METHODS: Eighty-four affected feet (42 unilateral, 21 bilateral) were retrospectively reviewed. History, clinical exam, and gait data were collected. Statistical analysis included evaluations of associations between clinical exam and gait parameters and differences among patients with unilateral versus bilateral clubfoot and a database of healthy controls. RESULTS: The average age was 7.5 ± 3.3 years for unilateral and 7.0 ± 2.8 years for bilateral patients. Patients presented with limited passive ankle dorsiflexion (unilateral/bilateral:67%/57%), limited ankle plantar flexion strength (unilateral/bilateral:53%/55%), metatarsus adductus (unilateral/bilateral:86%/83%) and internal foot-thigh angles (unilateral/bilateral:83%/82%), while only a subset presented with internal bi-malleolar axis angles (unilateral/bilateral:36%/45%). The most common gait deviations were internal foot progression (unilateral/bilateral:76%/73%), external hip rotation (unilateral/bilateral:66%/69%), reduced peak ankle plantar flexion moments (unilateral/bilateral:84%/83%), and reduced peak ankle power generation (unilateral/bilateral:67%/74%). Passive dorsiflexion was significantly correlated with peak dorsiflexion during stance and swing in both groups. Patients with unilateral compared to bilateral clubfoot showed decreased peak dorsiflexion and an associated knee flexor moment. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with recurrent clubfoot show gait deviations at the ankle that can be explained by joint level impairment and compensations at the knee, hip and pelvis. Patients with unilateral clubfoot typically show decreased dorsiflexion range of motion and associated greater gait impacts and compensations than bilateral clubfoot. Understanding the relationships between impairments and gait function and the implications of unilateral versus bilateral clubfoot will help improve prognostic ability and optimize future treatment outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Patients with recurrent clubfoot may seek intervention to address impairments that impact gait function. An understanding of these impairments and associated gait issues will provide valuable information about ongoing treatment requirements. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of impairments and associated gait deviations in children with recurrent clubfoot and to evaluate whether these findings differ depending on unilateral or bilateral presentation. METHODS: Eighty-four affected feet (42 unilateral, 21 bilateral) were retrospectively reviewed. History, clinical exam, and gait data were collected. Statistical analysis included evaluations of associations between clinical exam and gait parameters and differences among patients with unilateral versus bilateral clubfoot and a database of healthy controls. RESULTS: The average age was 7.5 ± 3.3 years for unilateral and 7.0 ± 2.8 years for bilateral patients. Patients presented with limited passive ankle dorsiflexion (unilateral/bilateral:67%/57%), limited ankle plantar flexion strength (unilateral/bilateral:53%/55%), metatarsus adductus (unilateral/bilateral:86%/83%) and internal foot-thigh angles (unilateral/bilateral:83%/82%), while only a subset presented with internal bi-malleolar axis angles (unilateral/bilateral:36%/45%). The most common gait deviations were internal foot progression (unilateral/bilateral:76%/73%), external hip rotation (unilateral/bilateral:66%/69%), reduced peak ankle plantar flexion moments (unilateral/bilateral:84%/83%), and reduced peak ankle power generation (unilateral/bilateral:67%/74%). Passive dorsiflexion was significantly correlated with peak dorsiflexion during stance and swing in both groups. Patients with unilateral compared to bilateral clubfoot showed decreased peak dorsiflexion and an associated knee flexor moment. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with recurrent clubfoot show gait deviations at the ankle that can be explained by joint level impairment and compensations at the knee, hip and pelvis. Patients with unilateral clubfoot typically show decreased dorsiflexion range of motion and associated greater gait impacts and compensations than bilateral clubfoot. Understanding the relationships between impairments and gait function and the implications of unilateral versus bilateral clubfoot will help improve prognostic ability and optimize future treatment outcomes.