Literature DB >> 31626008

Subluxation of the Middle Facet of the Subtalar Joint as a Marker of Peritalar Subluxation in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: A Case-Control Study.

Cesar de Cesar Netto1,2, Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos1,3, Guilherme H Saito1, Francois Lintz4, Sorin Siegler5, Martin J O'Malley1, Jonathan T Deland1, Scott J Ellis1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progressive peritalar subluxation (PTS) is part of adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). We investigated the use of the middle facet as an indicator of PTS using standing, weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) images. We hypothesized that weight-bearing CT would be an accurate method of measuring increased subluxation ("uncoverage") and incongruence of the middle-facet among patients with AAFD.
METHODS: We included 30 patients with stage-II AAFD (20 female and 10 male; mean age, 57.4 years [range, 24 to 78 years]) and 30 matched controls (20 female and 10 male; mean age, 51.8 years [range, 19 to 81 years]) who underwent standing, weight-bearing CT. Two independent and blinded fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons measured the amount of subluxation (percentage of uncoverage) and the incongruence angle of the middle facet at the midpoint of its longitudinal length, using coronal-plane, weight-bearing, cone-beam CT images. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Comparisons were performed using independent t tests or Wilcoxon tests. P values of <0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: Substantial to almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver reliability was observed for both measurements. We found that the middle facet demonstrated significantly increased PTS in patients with AAFD, with a mean value for joint uncoverage of 45.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.5% to 52.1%) compared with 4.8% (95% CI, 3.2% to 6.4%) in controls (p < 0.0001). A significant difference was also found for the incongruence angle, with a mean value of 17.3° (95% CI, 14.7° to 19.9°) in the AAFD group and 0.3° (95% CI, 0.1° to 0.5°) in controls (p < 0.0001). A joint incongruence angle of >8.4° was found to be diagnostic for symptomatic stage-II AAFD.
CONCLUSIONS: We investigated the use of the middle facet of the subtalar joint as a marker for PTS in patients with AAFD. We confirmed that standing, weight-bearing CT images allowed accurate measurements and that significant differences were found in the percentage of joint uncoverage and the incongruence angle compared with controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The assessment of the amount of subluxation and incongruence of the middle facet of the subtalar joint represents an accurate diagnostic tool for symptomatic adult acquired flatfoot deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31626008     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

1.  Contribution of First-Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion to Deformity Correction in the Treatment of Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.

Authors:  Jonathan Day; Matthew S Conti; Nicholas Williams; Scott J Ellis; Jonathan T Deland; Elizabeth A Cody
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20

2.  Morphologic analysis of the subtalar joint using statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Amy L Lenz; Rich J Lisonbee; Andrew C Peterson; Penny R Atkins; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson; Alexej Barg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  WEIGHT-BEARING CONE BEAM CT SCANS AND ITS USES IN ANKLE, FOOT, AND KNEE: AN UPDATE ARTICLE.

Authors:  Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lôbo; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  Identification of risk factors for falls in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Zhao; G Liang; H Huang; L Zeng; W Yang; J Pan; J Liu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 5.  Talus morphology differs between flatfeet and controls, but its variety has no influence on extent of surgical deformity correction.

Authors:  Andreas Flury; Julian Hasler; Silvan Beeler; Florian B Imhoff; Stephan H Wirth; Arndt Viehöfer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.928

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.