Literature DB >> 31625596

Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.

Linda J Harrison1, Tom Chen2, Rui Wang1,2.   

Abstract

Standard sample size calculation formulas for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) assume that cluster sizes are equal. When cluster sizes vary substantially, ignoring this variation may lead to an under-powered study. We investigate the relative efficiency of a SW-CRT with varying cluster sizes to equal cluster sizes, and derive variance estimators for the intervention effect that account for this variation under a mixed effects model-a commonly used approach for analyzing data from cluster randomized trials. When cluster sizes vary, the power of a SW-CRT depends on the order in which clusters receive the intervention, which is determined through randomization. We first derive a variance formula that corresponds to any particular realization of the randomized sequence and propose efficient algorithms to identify upper and lower bounds of the power. We then obtain an "expected" power based on a first-order approximation to the variance formula, where the expectation is taken with respect to all possible randomization sequences. Finally, we provide a variance formula for more general settings where only the cluster size arithmetic mean and coefficient of variation, instead of exact cluster sizes, are known in the design stage. We evaluate our methods through simulations and illustrate that the average power of a SW-CRT decreases as the variation in cluster sizes increases, and the impact is largest when the number of clusters is small.
© 2019 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomized trials; cluster size variation; cross-sectional; power; sample size; stepped wedge

Year:  2019        PMID: 31625596      PMCID: PMC7165039          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

Review 1.  Studies with staggered starts: multiple baseline designs and group-randomized trials.

Authors:  Dale A Rhoda; David M Murray; Rebecca R Andridge; Michael L Pennell; Erinn M Hade
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Michael A Hussey; James P Hughes
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Deborah Ashby; Sally Kerry
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Highly efficient stepped wedge designs for clusters of unequal size.

Authors:  John N S Matthews
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials.

Authors:  A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Sample size determination for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Fan Li; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting.

Authors:  K Hemming; T P Haines; P J Chilton; A J Girling; R J Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-06

8.  Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Clare Rutterford; Andrew Copas; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Caroline A Kristunas; Karen L Smith; Laura J Gray
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.

Authors:  Alan J Girling
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  7 in total

1.  Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  Linda J Harrison; Rui Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials: A Methodological Overview.

Authors:  Fan Li; Rui Wang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  Sample size considerations for stepped wedge designs with subclusters.

Authors:  Kendra Davis-Plourde; Monica Taljaard; Fan Li
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 1.701

4.  Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Zibo Tian; John S Preisser; Denise Esserman; Elizabeth L Turner; Paul J Rathouz; Fan Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.715

5.  Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes.

Authors:  Yongdong Ouyang; Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; Paul Gustafson; Thalia S Field; Hubert Wong
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.

Authors:  Fan Li; James P Hughes; Karla Hemming; Monica Taljaard; Edward R Melnick; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment.

Authors:  Jessica Kasza; Rhys Bowden; Richard Hooper; Andrew B Forbes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.