Eliza R C Hagens1, Hannah T Künzli2, Anne-Sophie van Rijswijk1, Sybren L Meijer3, R Clinton D Mijnals3, Bas L A M Weusten2, E Debby Geijsen4, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven5, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen1, Suzanne S Gisbertz6. 1. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.s.gisbertz@amc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRTx) is unclear, but may have consequences for radiotherapy and surgery. The aim of this study was to define the distribution of lymph node metastases and relation to the radiation field in patients following nCRTx and esophagectomy. METHODS: Between April 2014 and August 2015 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy following nCRTx were included in this prospective observational study. Lymph node stations according to AJCC 7 were separately investigated. The location of lymph node metastases in relation to the radiation field was determined. The primary endpoint was the distribution of lymph node metastases and relation to the radiation field, the secondary endpoints were high-risk stations and risk factors for lymph node metastases and relation to survival. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients were included. Lymph node metastases were found in 60% of patients and most frequently observed in paraesophageal (28%), left gastric artery (24%), and celiac trunk (18%) stations. Fifty-two percent had lymph node metastases within the radiation field. The incidence of lymph node metastases correlated significantly with ypT-stage (p = 0.002), cT-stage (p = 0.005), lymph angioinvasion (p = 0.004), and Mandard (p = 0.002). The number of lymph node metastases was associated with survival in univariable analysis (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.068-1.173, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal adenocarcinoma frequently metastasizes to both the mediastinal and abdominal lymph node stations. In this study, more than half of the patients had lymph node metastases within the radiation field. nCRTx is therefore not a reason to minimize lymphadenectomy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.
BACKGROUND: The distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRTx) is unclear, but may have consequences for radiotherapy and surgery. The aim of this study was to define the distribution of lymph node metastases and relation to the radiation field in patients following nCRTx and esophagectomy. METHODS: Between April 2014 and August 2015 esophageal adenocarcinomapatients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy following nCRTx were included in this prospective observational study. Lymph node stations according to AJCC 7 were separately investigated. The location of lymph node metastases in relation to the radiation field was determined. The primary endpoint was the distribution of lymph node metastases and relation to the radiation field, the secondary endpoints were high-risk stations and risk factors for lymph node metastases and relation to survival. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients were included. Lymph node metastases were found in 60% of patients and most frequently observed in paraesophageal (28%), left gastric artery (24%), and celiac trunk (18%) stations. Fifty-two percent had lymph node metastases within the radiation field. The incidence of lymph node metastases correlated significantly with ypT-stage (p = 0.002), cT-stage (p = 0.005), lymph angioinvasion (p = 0.004), and Mandard (p = 0.002). The number of lymph node metastases was associated with survival in univariable analysis (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.068-1.173, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Esophageal adenocarcinoma frequently metastasizes to both the mediastinal and abdominal lymph node stations. In this study, more than half of the patients had lymph node metastases within the radiation field. nCRTx is therefore not a reason to minimize lymphadenectomy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Minke L Feenstra; Lily Alkemade; Janneke E van den Bergh; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Freek Daams; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Wietse J Eshuis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Smita Sihag; Tamar Nobel; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Rebecca Carr; Yelena Y Janjigian; Laura H Tang; Abraham J Wu; Matthew J Bott; James M Isbell; Manjit S Bains; David R Jones; Daniela Molena Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Minke L Feenstra; Werner Ten Hoope; Jeroen Hermanides; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Markus W Hollmann; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Wietse J Eshuis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 5.344