Literature DB >> 31624386

[Application of Neuroform EZ stent in the treatment of severe intracranial arterial stenosis with complex symptomatic].

Z C Jia1, H J Bian2, X Li1, J Y Luan1, C M Wang1, Q J Liu1, J T Han1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of Neuroform EZ stent used in treatment of symptomatic complex severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS).
METHODS: Clinical data of 18 patients with symptomatic complex severe ICAS undergoing Neuroform EZ stent angioplasty from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All the lesions of the patients in this group were considered as complex ICAS, i.e. with severe tortuous access, long (>10 mm) or occlusive or bifurcation lesions, with concurrent aneurysms near the stenotic lesion. The primary outcome was defined as any stroke (including ischemic or hemorrhagic) or deaths from any cause after stenting procedure within 30 days. The secondary outcome was defined as successful revascularization and occurrence of >50% in-stent restenosis during the follow-up period.
RESULTS: All the 18 patients achieved technical success (100%) and mean stenosis rate was reduced from 85%±7% to 18%±6%. Of the 18 patients included, the 30-day stroke or death was 5.6% (1/18), which presented as basal ganglia region infarction in a patient with tandem lesions on the left vertebral artery. There was no hemorrhagic and death complications that occurred in the patients of this group. One concurrent aneurysm was embolized with micro coil (stent assisted) by stages after 1 month. In this group 12 patients were followed up with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after hospital discharge. The follow-up period ranged from 8 months to 26 months [mean: (16±8) months].During the follow-up period 2 patients in the 12 patients (2/12, 16.7%) developed in-stent restenosis (ISR) confirmed by DSA, and one of them was symptomatic restenosis and restored unobstructed blood flow after balloon angioplasty.
CONCLUSION: Neuroform EZ stent for the treatment of highly screened symptomatic complex severe ICAS is safe and effective. It has its advantages over traditional stent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624386      PMCID: PMC7433519     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  13 in total

1.  A comparison of functional and physical properties of self-expanding intracranial stents [Neuroform3, Wingspan, Solitaire, Leo+, Enterprise].

Authors:  O Krischek; E Miloslavski; S Fischer; S Shrivastava; H Henkes
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2011-04-19

2.  Is there a future for endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease after Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke and Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS)?

Authors:  Michael P Marks
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: clinical outcomes and risk factors for in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Yong Sam Shin; Byung Moon Kim; Sang Hyun Suh; Pyoung Jeon; Dong Joon Kim; Dong Ik Kim; Bum-Soo Kim; Keon Ha Kim; Ji Hoe Heo; Hyo Suk Nam; Young Dae Kim
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Harriet Howlett-Smith; Barney J Stern; Vicki S Hertzberg; Michael R Frankel; Steven R Levine; Seemant Chaturvedi; Scott E Kasner; Curtis G Benesch; Cathy A Sila; Tudor G Jovin; Jose G Romano
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study.

Authors:  Yongjun Wang; Xingquan Zhao; Liping Liu; Yannie O Y Soo; Yuehua Pu; Yuesong Pan; Yilong Wang; Xinying Zou; Thomas W H Leung; Yefeng Cai; Qingke Bai; Yiping Wu; Chunxue Wang; Xiaoping Pan; Benyan Luo; Ka Sing Lawrence Wong
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Osama O Zaidat; Brian-Fred Fitzsimmons; Britton Keith Woodward; Zhigang Wang; Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer; Ajay Wakhloo; Rishi Gupta; Howard Kirshner; J Thomas Megerian; James Lesko; Pamela Pitzer; Jandira Ramos; Alicia C Castonguay; Stanley Barnwell; Wade S Smith; Daryl R Gress
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015 Mar 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; Michel T Torbey; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Thirty-Day Outcome of a Multicenter Registry Study of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis in China.

Authors:  Zhongrong Miao; Yong Zhang; Jie Shuai; Changchun Jiang; Qiyi Zhu; Kangning Chen; Li Liu; Baomin Li; Xiangqun Shi; Lianbo Gao; Yajie Liu; Feng Wang; Yongli Li; Tieyan Liu; Hongbo Zheng; Yilong Wang; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.

Authors:  R L Sacco; D E Kargman; Q Gu; M C Zamanillo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Prevention of intracranial in-stent restenoses: predilatation with a drug eluting balloon, followed by the deployment of a self-expanding stent.

Authors:  Zsolt Vajda; Thomas Güthe; Marta Aguilar Perez; Wiebke Kurre; Elisabeth Schmid; Hansjörg Bäzner; Hans Henkes
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.