Hila Fridman1,2,3, Doron M Behar4, Shai Carmi1, Ephrat Levy-Lahad5,6. 1. Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 2. Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 3. Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 4. Igentify, Tirat Hacarmel, Israel. 5. Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. lahad@szmc.org.il. 6. Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. lahad@szmc.org.il.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Expanded preconception carrier screening (ECS) identifies at-risk couples (ARCs) for multiple diseases. ECS reports currently include only pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs). Variants of unknown significance (VUS) are not reported, unlike genomic or chromosomal array test results in other post/prenatal settings. Couples who are P/LP and VUS carriers (P/LP*VUS) may be at risk, particularly in genes with high P/LP carrier rates. We examined the possible contribution of P/LP*cVUS (coding, nonsynonymous VUS) matings to ECS yield in an Ashkenazi Jewish cohort, a population with well-established preconception screening. METHODS: We analyzed 672 Ashkenazi Jewish genome sequences (225,456 virtual matings) for variants in three different gene sets and calculated the rates of P/LP*P/LP and P/LP*cVUS matings. RESULTS: Across 180 genes, we identified 4671 variants: 144 (3.1%) P/LP and 1963 (42%) VUS. Across gene sets, the proportion of P/LP*P/LP and P/LP*cVUS ARCs was 2.7-3.8% and 6.8-7.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Disregarding VUS in ECS may miss ARCs. Even if only 10% of couples currently classified as P/LP*cVUS are ultimately reclassified as P/LP*P/LP, ECS yield would increase by ≈20%. While current understanding of VUS precludes VUS reporting in ECS, these findings underscore the importance of VUS reclassification. This will crucially depend on enlarging population frequency databases, especially of affected individuals.
PURPOSE: Expanded preconception carrier screening (ECS) identifies at-risk couples (ARCs) for multiple diseases. ECS reports currently include only pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs). Variants of unknown significance (VUS) are not reported, unlike genomic or chromosomal array test results in other post/prenatal settings. Couples who are P/LP and VUS carriers (P/LP*VUS) may be at risk, particularly in genes with high P/LP carrier rates. We examined the possible contribution of P/LP*cVUS (coding, nonsynonymous VUS) matings to ECS yield in an Ashkenazi Jewish cohort, a population with well-established preconception screening. METHODS: We analyzed 672 Ashkenazi Jewish genome sequences (225,456 virtual matings) for variants in three different gene sets and calculated the rates of P/LP*P/LP and P/LP*cVUS matings. RESULTS: Across 180 genes, we identified 4671 variants: 144 (3.1%) P/LP and 1963 (42%) VUS. Across gene sets, the proportion of P/LP*P/LP and P/LP*cVUS ARCs was 2.7-3.8% and 6.8-7.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Disregarding VUS in ECS may miss ARCs. Even if only 10% of couples currently classified as P/LP*cVUS are ultimately reclassified as P/LP*P/LP, ECS yield would increase by ≈20%. While current understanding of VUS precludes VUS reporting in ECS, these findings underscore the importance of VUS reclassification. This will crucially depend on enlarging population frequency databases, especially of affected individuals.
Authors: Simon Easteal; Ruth M Arkell; Renzo F Balboa; Shayne A Bellingham; Alex D Brown; Tom Calma; Matthew C Cook; Megan Davis; Hugh J S Dawkins; Marcel E Dinger; Michael S Dobbie; Ashley Farlow; Kylie G Gwynne; Azure Hermes; Wendy E Hoy; Misty R Jenkins; Simon H Jiang; Warren Kaplan; Stephen Leslie; Bastien Llamas; Graham J Mann; Brendan J McMorran; Rebekah E McWhirter; Cliff J Meldrum; Shivashankar H Nagaraj; Saul J Newman; Jack S Nunn; Lyndon Ormond-Parker; Neil J Orr; Devashi Paliwal; Hardip R Patel; Glenn Pearson; Greg R Pratt; Boe Rambaldini; Lynette W Russell; Ravi Savarirayan; Matthew Silcocks; John C Skinner; Yassine Souilmi; Carola G Vinuesa; Gareth Baynam Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Sufyan A Dogra; Daniel S Malawsky; Massimo Mezzavilla; Elena Arciero; Theofanis Tsismentzoglou; Qin Qin Huang; Karen A Hunt; Dan Mason; Saghira Malik Sharif; David A van Heel; Eamonn Sheridan; John Wright; Neil Small; Shai Carmi; Mark M Iles; Hilary C Martin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Paranchai Boonsawat; Anselm H C Horn; Katharina Steindl; Alessandra Baumer; Pascal Joset; Dennis Kraemer; Angela Bahr; Ivan Ivanovski; Elena M Cabello; Michael Papik; Markus Zweier; Beatrice Oneda; Pietro Sirleto; Tilo Burkhardt; Heinrich Sticht; Anita Rauch Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 6.083