Literature DB >> 31624168

Draft Genome Sequences of 43 Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolates from a Commercial Beef Processing Plant and Retail Ground Beef.

Devin B Holman1, Katherine E Gzyl2, Rahat Zaheer3, Tineke H Jones2, Tim A McAllister3.   

Abstract

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of 36 Enterococcus faecalis and 7 Enterococcus faecium isolates recovered from a beef processing facility and retail ground beef. The beef processing facility samples were collected from beef carcasses, conveyor belts, and ground product. © Crown copyright 2019.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624168      PMCID: PMC6797533          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00974-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are commensal microorganisms present in the gastrointestinal tract of both humans and cattle; therefore, enterococci are often used as an indicator of fecal contamination. We collected samples from four different locations in a commercial beef processing facility in Alberta, Canada, over an 18-month period. Enterococcus spp. were collected from a randomly selected 10- by 10-cm area on carcasses after hide removal (H) and final washing (W), as well as from conveyer belts (C) using a 2- by 2-cm sterile gauze swab (n = 150 each). Ground product (n = 150) and retail ground beef (n = 60) samples (25 g each) were also collected during the same time period. The swabs and ground samples were homogenized and preenriched in a Stomacher 400 circulator (Seward, Norfolk, UK) at 260 rpm for 2 min in 10 ml or 225 ml of buffered peptone water, respectively, and incubated overnight at 37°C. A 1-ml aliquot of this mixture was then added to 9 ml of Enterococcosel broth (BD, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and incubated overnight at 37°C to enrich for Enterococcus spp. Enterococcosel broth tubes displaying evidence of esculin hydrolysis (black) were streaked onto Enterococcosel agar and incubated at 37°C. After 48 h, the plates were examined for colonies with black zones, which is indicative of esculin hydrolysis. The groES-EL spacer region of presumptive enterococcal colonies was amplified using the EntES-211-233-F and Ent-EL-74-95-R primers (1), and the product was sequenced using an ABI Prism 3130xl genetic analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) for confirmation and species identification. From the confirmed Enterococcus spp., 36 E. faecalis and 7 E. faecium isolates were selected for whole-genome sequencing. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) with the modification that cells were incubated with agitation (150 rpm) for 45 min at 37°C in 280 μl of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 2 mM sodium EDTA, 1.2% Triton X-100, and 20 mg/ml lysozyme; Sigma-Aldrich Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to prepare sequencing libraries that were sequenced on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, Inc.) with the MiSeq reagent kit v3 (Illumina, Inc.; 600 cycles) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. FastQC v0.11.5 (2) was used to assess read quality before (678,235 ± 23,253 [standard error of the mean {SEM}] reads per isolate) and after (596,916 ± 21,456 reads per isolate) quality filtering. Sequencing adapters, reads with a quality score of less than 15 over a 4-bp sliding window, and reads that were less than 50 bp in length were removed with Trimmomatic v0.38 (3). The paired-end reads were assembled with SPAdes v3.11.1 (4), with the default parameters in the “careful” mode, and the quality of the assemblies was determined using QUAST v5.0.1 (5). Contigs less than 500 bp in length were removed prior to confirming the taxonomy of each assembly with Kraken 2 v2.0.7-beta and the minikraken2 database v2 (6). The assemblies were then annotated with Prokka v1.13.3 (7) using the default parameters. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was done using the Enterococcus faecalis MLST website (https://pubmlst.org/efaecalis/) (8) and the Enterococcus faecium MLST website (https://pubmlst.org/efaecium/) (9). The assembly statistics, GenBank and SRA accession numbers, and MLST results for each isolate are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Assembly statistics for Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from a beef processing facility and retail ground beef

Isolate nameSpeciesGenBank accession no.SRA accession no.No. of contigsNo. of readsGenome size (bp)N50 value (bp)Coverage (×)No. of coding sequencesG+C content (%)MLST
C112E. faecalisGCA_006541215SRR932112926722,8842,988,147605,310732,88637.43Unknown
C138E. faecalisGCA_006541395SRR932112830899,0742,695,188213,6291002,55737.59228
C144E. faecalisGCA_006541075SRR932112734689,8452,697,493222,684772,51937.58228
C146E. faecalisGCA_006541305SRR932112628502,8162,697,692351,123562,56737.59228
G109E. faecalisGCA_006541225SRR932113365463,3242,853,332140,707492,73937.57Unknown
G127EE. faecalisGCA_006541295SRR9321132105633,2573,053,01880,851622,99737.48Unknown
G138EE. faecalisGCA_006541335SRR9321131119564,9943,016,96486,924562,91737.4521
G149E. faecalisGCA_006541345SRR9321130125446,3602,994,46759,749452,85437.4240
G42E. faecalisGCA_006541405SRR932112597630,9332,872,25473,537662,71237.5621
G69EE. faecalisGCA_006541355SRR932112417529,4542,959,381645,373542,78437.51202
G81E. faecalisGCA_006541905SRR932113759859,9352,835,934144,986912,69737.55Unknown
G85E. faecalisGCA_006541465SRR932113664640,4162,876,123124,461672,73237.5276
H102E. faecalisGCA_006541755SRR9321139106416,5662,830,74273,730442,74737.6147
H112EE. faeciumGCA_006541175SRR932113842512,3782,655,194141,400582,51938.05212
H134EE. faeciumGCA_006541535SRR932114166535,6802,507,908101,754642,36538.0729
H136E. faecalisGCA_006541265SRR932114022883,5883,052,803378,930873,00137.34Unknown
H22E. faecalisGCA_006541095SRR932114335657,2882,786,536250,863712,56437.4916
H4E. faecalisGCA_006541805SRR932114259641,3692,996,880146,743642,86037.4240
H44E. faecalisGCA_006541185SRR932113546649,0402,816,920228,593692,62937.5776
H74E. faecalisGCA_006541115SRR932113438769,2792,733,857166,527842,57537.57Unknown
H96EE. faecalisGCA_006541255SRR932116032664,9502,847,191191,075702,64437.53708
R2E. faeciumGCA_006541615SRR9321161145784,1552,743,99546,108862,68238.2476
R20E. faecalisGCA_006541155SRR9321162163623,2262,985,19978,020632,85937.52260
R26EE. faeciumGCA_006541645SRR9321163237261,8752,688,51223,732292,59438.3876
R29E. faecalisGCA_006541545SRR932115645468,5362,911,452206,037482,78537.47260
R30E. faecalisGCA_006541705SRR932115749505,8692,647,10384,312572,48837.7228
R37E. faecalisGCA_006541775SRR932115870482,3502,929,864135,712492,76937.39260
R43EE. faecalisGCA_006541085SRR932115973591,6362,833,91687,778632,73437.49Unknown
R49E. faecalisGCA_006541715SRR932115436390,4833,029,112153,103392,92137.37192
R4EE. faeciumGCA_006541685SRR9321155100667,3952,738,43275,527732,68338.24Unknown
R50E. faecalisGCA_006541785SRR9321147113519,6172,976,79877,751522,86337.4621
R51E. faecalisGCA_006541855SRR932114662463,0473,005,276121,849462,95737.4584
R52E. faecalisGCA_006541795SRR932114566449,6343,046,695119,574442,93137.37260
R53E. faecalisGCA_006541655SRR932114479596,5603,030,982119,130592,96637.42260
R5EE. faecalisGCA_006541525SRR932115176611,4622,934,49297,444632,78537.39Unknown
R7E. faecalisGCA_006541595SRR932115051507,6242,911,924184,949522,82137.47260
W100E. faecalisGCA_006541515SRR932114955452,6462,961,448130,717462,83237.42260
W133E. faecalisGCA_006541445SRR9321148364678,0902,944,91714,728692,79937.19Unknown
W141E. faeciumGCA_006541625SRR932115382626,6992,761,265123,573682,69538.2276
W148EE. faeciumGCA_006541485SRR932115296501,1122,758,66389,896542,68738.2376
W19E. faecalisGCA_006541875SRR932112276865,6572,956,998112,037882,84637.5Unknown
W84E. faecalisGCA_006541885SRR932112399564,9793,018,22389,324562,89637.45Unknown
W97E. faecalisGCA_006541435SRR932112161741,3063,050,168155,000732,96137.3740

The number of coding sequences is based on Prokka annotations. Annotations in GenBank are based on the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP).

Assembly statistics for Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from a beef processing facility and retail ground beef The number of coding sequences is based on Prokka annotations. Annotations in GenBank are based on the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). The genome assemblies were also screened for the presence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes using BLASTn 2.6.0+ and the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD; v3.0.2) (10), with a minimum identity of 90%. The most prevalent AMR genes in the E. faecalis genomes were tet(M) (25%) and erm(B) (8%); in the E. faecium assemblies, msrC (100%), aac(6′)-II (100%), and tet(M) (29%) were most frequently detected.

Data availability.

All sequences and draft genome assemblies have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive and GenBank, respectively, under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
  9 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  High-throughput species identification of enterococci using pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Rahat Zaheer; L Jay Yanke; Deirdre Church; Edward Topp; Ronald R Read; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecalis reveals hospital-adapted genetic complexes in a background of high rates of recombination.

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa; Marc J M Bonten; D Ashley Robinson; Janetta Top; Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Carmen Torres; Teresa M Coque; Rafael Cantón; Fernando Baquero; Barbara E Murray; Rosa del Campo; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies.

Authors:  Alexey Gurevich; Vladislav Saveliev; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.

Authors:  Andrew G McArthur; Nicholas Waglechner; Fazmin Nizam; Austin Yan; Marisa A Azad; Alison J Baylay; Kirandeep Bhullar; Marc J Canova; Gianfranco De Pascale; Linda Ejim; Lindsay Kalan; Andrew M King; Kalinka Koteva; Mariya Morar; Michael R Mulvey; Jonathan S O'Brien; Andrew C Pawlowski; Laura J V Piddock; Peter Spanogiannopoulos; Arlene D Sutherland; Irene Tang; Patricia L Taylor; Maulik Thaker; Wenliang Wang; Marie Yan; Tennison Yu; Gerard D Wright
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Wieger L Homan; David Tribe; Simone Poznanski; Mei Li; Geoff Hogg; Emile Spalburg; Jan D A Van Embden; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments.

Authors:  Derrick E Wood; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus Spp. Isolated from a Beef Processing Plant and Retail Ground Beef.

Authors:  Devin B Holman; Cassidy L Klima; Katherine E Gzyl; Rahat Zaheer; Cara Service; Tineke H Jones; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-11-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.