| Literature DB >> 31622439 |
Valentina Caicedo-Garzón1,2, Fabian C Salgado-Roa2, Melissa Sánchez-Herrera2, Carolina Hernández1, Luisa María Arias-Giraldo1, Lineth García3, Gustavo Vallejo4, Omar Cantillo5, Catalina Tovar6, Joao Aristeu da Rosa7, Hernán J Carrasco8, Maikell Segovia8, Camilo Salazar2, Juan David Ramírez1.
Abstract
Triatomines are the vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas disease. Although Triatoma and Rhodnius are the most-studied vector genera, other triatomines, such as Panstrongylus, also transmit T. cruzi, creating new epidemiological scenarios. Panstrongylus has at least 13 reported species but there is limited information about its intraspecific genetic variation and patterns of diversification. Here, we begin to fill this gap by studying populations of P. geniculatus from Colombia and Venezuela and including other epidemiologically important species from the region. We examined the pattern of diversification of P. geniculatus in Colombia using mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal data. Genetic diversity and differentiation were calculated within and among populations of P. geniculatus. Moreover, we constructed maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference phylogenies and haplotype networks using P. geniculatus and other species from the genus (P. megistus, P. lignarius, P. lutzi, P. tupynambai, P. chinai, P. rufotuberculatus and P. howardi). Using a coalescence framework, we also dated the P. geniculatus lineages. The total evidence tree showed that P. geniculatus is a monophyletic species, with four clades that are concordant with its geographic distribution and are partly explained by the Andes orogeny. However, other factors, including anthropogenic and eco-epidemiological effects must be investigated to explain the existence of recent geographic P. geniculatus lineages. The epidemiological dynamics in structured vector populations, such as those found here, warrant further investigation. Extending our knowledge of P. geniculatus is necessary for the accurate development of effective strategies for the control of Chagas disease vectors.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31622439 PMCID: PMC6797096 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223963
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map showing the locations of the samples collected in this study.
The size of the circle is not representative of the number of individuals collected at each location. The map was constructed using QGIS version 2.18.7.
Fig 2BI consensus phylogenetic tree inferred from mitochondrial DNA and distribution of the geographical clades.
Numbers at the nodes are the bootstrap/posterior probability support values. Distributions were calculated with minimum convex polygon and are color coded based on the tree clades. The map was constructed using QGIS version 2.18.7.
Fig 3Dated coalescent Bayesian species tree estimated in *BEAST2.
Numbers at the nodes are the estimated times of divergence. Each blue bar corresponds to the 95% highest posterior density (HDP) interval.
Fig 4Haplotype networks inferred with nuclear rRNA: A. Each tick on the haplotype network represents a mutational step.
Fig 5Haplotype networks for mitochondrial loci grouped by species: A. Each tick on the branches represents a mutational step.
Measures of population structure between species and geographic clusters of P. geniculatus at mtDNA loci.
| Population1 | SNSM-Ven | SNSM-Ven | SNSM-Ven | West | West | NSant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population2 | West | NSant | East | NSant | East | East | ||||
| 0.932 | ---- | ---- | 0.459 | 0.863 | 0.676 | 0.599 | 0.157 | 0.853 | ||
| 0.161 | ---- | ---- | 0.084 | 0.082 | 0.068 | 0.082 | 0.052 | 0.075 | ||
| 0.123 | ---- | ---- | 0.039 | 0.071 | 0.047 | 0.049 | 0.008 | 0.064 | ||
| 0.00001 | ---- | ---- | 0.00001 | 0.039 | 0.00001 | 0.028 | 0.00001 | 0.001 | ||
| 0.756 | 0.823 | 0.863 | 0.641 | 0.874 | 0.550 | 0.701 | 0.538 | 0.744 | ||
| 0.158 | 0.159 | 0.155 | 0.085 | 0.061 | 0.045 | 0.093 | 0.088 | 0.062 | ||
| 0.119 | 0.131 | 0.134 | 0.057 | 0.053 | 0.025 | 0.065 | 0.047 | 0.046 | ||
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.002 | 0.00001 | 0.006 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | ||
| 0.911 | 0.910 | 0.969 | 0.417 | 0.756 | 0.456 | 0.539 | 0.328 | 0.713 | ||
| 0.084 | 0.095 | 0.075 | 0.029 | 0.015 | 0.013 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.011 | ||
| 0.077 | 0.086 | 0.073 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | ||
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.037 | 0.00001 | 0.005 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | ||
| 0.768 | 0.845 | 0.861 | 0.671 | 0.882 | 0.642 | 0.598 | 0.523 | 0.744 | ||
| 0.143 | 0.125 | 0.142 | 0.074 | 0.039 | 0.041 | 0.063 | 0.049 | 0.053 | ||
| 0.112 | 0.104 | 0.102 | 0.033 | 0.039 | 0.022 | 0.047 | 0.023 | 0.041 | ||
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.0027 | 0.00001 | 0.002 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Probability calculated with the Hudson permutation test, with 1000 replicates.
*0.01 < P < 0.05
**0.001 < P < 0.01
***P < 0.001. “----”: some statistics could not be calculated due to low number of haplotypes per population.
Genetic summary statistics for the three species analyzed in this study and for the Eastern, Western, North Santander (NSant) and Magdalena-Venezuela (SNSM-Ven) groups at each mitochondrial locus.
| Genomic marker | Species/lineage | n | h | S | π ± SD | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | 61 | 136 | 0.051±0.002 | −0.233 | ||
| 13 | 2 | 21 | 0.020±0.003 | 2.539 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ---------- | ||
| 61 | 30 | 54 | 0.022±0.002 | 0.185 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | --------- | ||
| 57 | 25 | 70 | 0.022±0.003 | -1.099 | ||
| 14 | 10 | 99 | 0.066±0.010 | 0.734 | ||
| 92 | 60 | 145 | 0.045±0.003 | −0.26792 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 62 | 0.031±0.012 | −0.28969 | ||
| 6 | 2 | 20 | 0.012±0.007 | −1.49247 | ||
| 66 | 44 | 76 | 0.028±0.002 | 0.081 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 0.003±0.001 | 2.012 | ||
| 12 | 6 | 23 | 0.013±0.003 | −0.050 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 92 | 0.054±0.011 | 0.039 | ||
| 92 | 35 | 48 | 0.014±0.002 | −0.84369 | ||
| 14 | 4 | 4 | 0.003±0.001 | 1.05159 | ||
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 0.001±0.001 | −1.13197 | ||
| 65 | 18 | 16 | 0.006±0.001 | -0.185 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | --------- | ||
| 7 | 6 | 1 | 0.007±0.001 | 1.381 | ||
| 18 | 11 | 34 | 0.027±0.002 | 1.400 | ||
| 70 | 61 | 497 | 0.005±0.003 | -0.677 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 0.002±0.001 | 2.011 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 11 | 0.016±0.01 | 1.032 | ||
| 18 | 11 | 34 | 0.027±0.002 | 1.400 |
n: number of sequences; h: number of haplotypes; S: number of segregating sites; π: nucleotide diversity; D: Tajima’s D. None of the loci showed Tajima’s D values that departed from neutral expectations.
Fig 6Haplotype networks for mitochondrial loci grouped by geographic location: A. Each tick on the branches represents a mutational step.
Isolation by distance analysis.
Mantel and correlation tests were performed with all the samples and without the extreme points.
| Entire Data | Excluding extreme points | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | R | R2 | P value | Mantel r | P value | R | R2 | P value |
| 0.3121 | 0.0974 | 0.0046 | 0.1442 | 0.2548 | 0.8107 | 0.6572 | 0.5143 | |
| 0.1935 | 0.0374 | 0.0538 | 0.0672 | 0.3373 | 0.2025 | 0.041 | 0.0616 | |
| 0.2422 | 0.0587 | 0.0294 | 0.0998 | 0.2328 | 0.0813 | 0.0066 | 0.5164 | |
P value:
*0.01 < P < 0.05
**0.001 < P < 0.01
Fig 7Isolation by distance plots for mitochondrial loci.
Two tests of correlation were performed: with all the data (top) and without the extreme points (bottom).