Literature DB >> 31622016

Histological comparison of three apatitic bone substitutes with different carbonate contents in alveolar bone defects in a beagle mandible with simultaneous implant installation.

Takamitsu Mano1, Kazuya Akita1, Naoyuki Fukuda1, Kumiko Kamada1, Naito Kurio1, Kunio Ishikawa2, Youji Miyamoto1.   

Abstract

Since bone apatite is a carbonate apatite containing carbonate in an apatitic structure, carbonate content may be one of the factors governing the osteoconductivity of apatitic bone substitutes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of carbonate content on the osteoconductivity of apatitic bone substitutes using three commercially available bone substitutes for the reconstruction of alveolar bone defects of a beagle mandible with simultaneous dental implant installation. NEOBONE, Bio-Oss, and Cytrans that contain 0.1, 5.5, and 12.0 mass% of carbonate, respectively, were used in this study. The amount of newly formed bone in the upper portion of the alveolar bone defect of the beagle's mandible was 0.7, 6.6, and 39.4% at 4 weeks after surgery and 4.7, 39.5, and 75.2% at 12 weeks after surgery for NEOBONE, Bio-Oss, and Cytrans, respectively. The results indicate that bone-to-implant contact ratio was the largest for Cytrans. Additionally, the continuity of the alveolar ridge was restored in the case of Cytrans, whereas the continuity of the alveolar ridge was not sufficient when using NEOBONE and Bio-Oss. Both Cytrans and Bio-Oss that have a relatively larger carbonate content in their apatitic structure was resorbed with time. We concluded that carbonate content is one of important factors governing the osteoconductivity of apatitic bone substitutes.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone substitute; carbonate apatite; hydroxyapatite; osteoconductivity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31622016     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis.

Authors:  Koudai Nagata; Kei Fuchigami; Ryoji Kitami; Yurie Okuhama; Kana Wakamori; Hirokazu Sumitomo; Hyunjin Kim; Manabu Okubo; Hiromasa Kawana
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-23

2.  Effect of carbonate apatite as a bone substitute on oral mucosal healing in a rat extraction socket: in vitro and in vivo analyses using carbonate apatite.

Authors:  Yuki Egashira; Ikiru Atsuta; Ikue Narimatsu; Xiaoxu Zhang; Ryosuke Takahashi; Kiyoshi Koyano; Yasunori Ayukawa
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-03-07

3.  Effects of pore interconnectivity on bone regeneration in carbonate apatite blocks.

Authors:  Maab Elsheikh; Ryo Kishida; Koichiro Hayashi; Akira Tsuchiya; Masaya Shimabukuro; Kunio Ishikawa
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-02-16

4.  Preparation of a nanopearl powder/C-HA (chitosan-hyaluronic acid)/rhBMP-2 (recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2) composite artificial bone material and a preliminary study of its effects on MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Wenbo Zhang; Pu Xu; Yanan Cheng; Yanlan Yang; Qiuhua Mao; Zuogeng Chen
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 6.832

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.