| Literature DB >> 31622015 |
Jiasi Wu1, Yu Luo1, Donghang Deng2, Siyu Su1, Sheng Li3, Li Xiang1, Yingfan Hu1, Ping Wang1, Xianli Meng1.
Abstract
Coptisine is a natural small-molecular compound extracted from Coptis chinensis (CC) with a history of using for thousands of years. This work aimed at summarizing coptisine's activity and providing advice for its clinical use. We analysed the online papers in the database of SciFinder, Web of Science, PubMed, Google scholar and CNKI by setting keywords as 'coptisine' in combination of 'each pivotal pathway target'. Based on the existing literatures, we find (a) coptisine exerted potential to be an anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, CAD ameliorating or anti-bacterial drug through regulating the signalling transduction of pathways such as NF-κB, MAPK, PI3K/Akt, NLRP3 inflammasome, RANKL/RANK and Beclin 1/Sirt1. However, we also (b) observe that the plasma concentration of coptisine demonstrates obvious non-liner relationship with dosage, and even the highest dosage used in animal study actually cannot reach the minimum concentration level used in cell experiments owing to the poor absorption and low availability of coptisine. We conclude (a) further investigations can focus on coptisine's effect on caspase-1-involved inflammasome assembling and pyroptosis activation, as well as autophagy. (b) Under circumstance of promoting coptisine availability by pursuing nano- or microrods strategies or applying salt-forming process to coptisine, can it be introduced to clinical trial.Entities:
Keywords: coptisine; crosstalk network; pharmacological mechanism; signalling pathways bioavailability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31622015 PMCID: PMC6850926 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Coptis chinensis Franch. Whole plant (A), dry root (B) and chemical structure of coptisine (C)
Non‐liner relationship between dosage and plasma concentration
| Route | Ber(mg) |
| AUC(μg/Lh) | Cop(mg) |
| AUC(μg/Lh) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| po. | 14.3 | 156.55 ± 27.85 | 571.59 ± 44.41 | 3.78 | 60.85 ± 7.34 | 309.59 ± 27.06 |
|
| po. | 23.76 | 12.27 ± 3.30 | 92.71 ± 15.03 | 5.16 | 1.39 ± 0.60 | 14.28 ± 2.38 |
|
| po. | 2.95 | 18.8 ± 4.55 | 40.7 ± 16.2 | 0.78 | 4.31 ± 0.31 | 6.2 ± 0.77 |
|
| po. | 3.92 | 109.40 ± 48.27 | 299.84 ± 55.27 | 1.32 | 14.13 ± 7.75 | 71.59 ± 10.72 |
|
| po. | 2.73 | 129.94 ± 2.56 | 38.23 ± 1.10 | 1.15 | 114.86 ± 5.89 | 45.18 ± 4.65 |
|
| po. | 2.31 | 42.00 ± 14.00 | 675.00 ± 270.00 | 2.24 | 31 ± 12 | 527 ± 10.00 |
|
| po. | 6 | 51.23 ± 7.59 | 63.24 ± 10.29 |
| |||
| po. | 15 | 44.15 ± 15.35 | 69.37 ± 11.92 |
| |||
| po. | 30 | 66.89 ± 29.66 | 87.97 ± 42.47 |
| |||
| po. | 10 | 210.38 ± 54.90 | 595.58 ± 123.16 |
| |||
| i.v | 2 | 3373.97 ± 448.92 | 167.07 ± 36.30 |
| |||
| i.v | 2 | 2542.03 ± 1242.16 | 1129.72 ± 289.63 |
|
Figure 2Non‐liner relationships between CC alkaloid dosages and plasma concentration (Cmax). There is an obvious process of limitation, and the bioavailability decreased along with the elevated dosage
Figure 3Schematic summaries of coptisine's anti‐cancer targets. Coptisine regulates cell cycle and blocks the occurrence of apoptosis and metastasis initiation by modulating the marked targets. Red arrows represent for decreased expression and/or activity; blue arrows represent for increased expression and/or activity
Figure 4Schematic summaries of coptisine's anti‐inflammatory and CVD protection targets. Coptisine blocks inflammatory response and ameliorates CADs through modulating the marked targets. Red arrows represent for decreased expression and/or activity; blue arrows represent for increased expression and/or activity
Targets of coptisine activity
| Mechanism | Effect | Targets | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti‐cancer | Elevated | Caspase‐3/8/9 |
|
| PARP |
| ||
| 67LR |
| ||
| Apaf‐1 |
| ||
| AIF |
| ||
| Cytochrome C |
| ||
| Bid |
| ||
| Bad |
| ||
| Bax |
| ||
| pH2AX |
| ||
| ROS |
| ||
| GSH |
| ||
| SOD |
| ||
| TIMP‐1 |
| ||
| E‐cadherin |
| ||
| Reduced | TLR‐4 |
| |
| Δψ m |
| ||
| XIAP |
| ||
| Bcl‐2 |
| ||
| Bcl‐XL |
| ||
| MMP‐3/9 |
| ||
| PI3K |
| ||
| AKT |
| ||
| Vimentin |
| ||
| N‐cadherin |
| ||
| Snail |
| ||
| CDK2/4/6 |
| ||
| Cyclin D/E |
| ||
| p21 |
| ||
| Cdc2/25C |
| ||
| CEA |
| ||
| CA119 |
| ||
| CYFRA |
| ||
| KRAS |
| ||
| p53 |
| ||
| Anti‐inflammation | Elevated | Nrf2 |
|
| Reduced | p38 |
| |
| ERK |
| ||
| JNK |
| ||
| PI3K |
| ||
| AKT |
| ||
| IKKα/β |
| ||
| p65 |
| ||
| iκBα |
| ||
| TNF‐α |
| ||
| IL‐4/6/1β |
| ||
| NLRP3 |
| ||
| Pro‐/caspase‐1 |
| ||
| MAL |
| ||
| Histamine |
| ||
| CAD protection | Elevated | Gadd45a |
|
| Rgs32 |
| ||
| CYP7A1 |
| ||
| Reduced | RhoA |
| |
| ROCK |
| ||
| MYPT‐1 |
| ||
| VCAM‐1 |
| ||
| ICAM‐1 |
| ||
| Ca2+ influx |
| ||
| HMGCR |
|
Signalling pathways modulated by coptisine activity
| Pathways | References |
|---|---|
| p38MAPK/Nrf2 |
|
| 67LR/cGMP |
|
| ASK1‐P58 |
|
| Beclin 1/Sirt1 |
|
| JNK/Nrf2/NQO1 |
|
| Kynurenine pathway |
|
| miR‐122/Bax/Bcl |
|
| Mitochondrial/caspase‐3 |
|
| NF‐κB |
|
| NF‐κB/MAPK |
|
| NF‐κB/MAPK/ PI3K/AKT |
|
| NLRP3 inflammasome |
|
| NO‐cGMP |
|
| PI3K/AKT/MMPs |
|
| RANKL/RANK |
|
| RAS/ERK |
|
| RhoA/ROCK |
|
| STAT3 |
|
| TLR‐4 |
|
| TIMP‐1/MMPs |
|
Figure 5Isoquinoline parent nucleus of quaternary proberberine alkaloid
Structure‐activity relationship of quaternary proberberine alkaloid
| Substituents | Position | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nitro | Ring A | Anti‐acetylcholinesterase activity was elevated |
|
| Hydrophilic radical | C‐13, ring C | Anti‐malarial activity was improved |
|
| High lipophilicity | C‐13, ring C | More potent anti‐bacterial activity |
|
| Aromatic | Ring C | A higher activity of G‐quadruplex induction and stabilization ability |
|
| Hydroxyl | C‐9, ring D | Hydroxyl radical scavenging effect was promoted |
|
| Methylenedioxy | C‐9 and C‐10, ring D | ||
| Dioxymethylene | Ring D | The inhibitory effect of aldose reductase was enhanced |
|
| Oxidized dioxymethylene | Ring A | ||
| Di‐methoxy | Ring D | Increased LDLR expression and AMPK activation |
|
Coptisine concentration ranges used in reviewed article
| Study Type | Dose | References | Study Type | Dose | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In vitro | 0.06‐0.25 μmol/L, 3 h |
| In vivo | 0.0025‐0.01 mg/mL, 12 hpf |
|
| 0.3‐10 μmol/L, 6 h |
| 0.97‐3.87 mg/kg, i.v, single dose, 0‐4 h |
| ||
| 0‐25 μmol/L, 24 h |
| 2.91‐11.61 mg/kg, i.v, single dose, 0‐24 h |
| ||
| 0‐28.11 μmol/L, 24 h |
| 10 mg/kg, i.v, single dose, 0.083‐24 h |
| ||
| 0‐40 μmol/L, 24 h |
| 10‐30 mg/kg, oral, two times |
| ||
| 0‐64 μmol/L, 24 h |
| 10‐40 mg/kg, once daily for 7d |
| ||
| 0‐75 μmol/L, 48 h |
| 10‐40 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 7d |
| ||
| 2.5‐40 μmol/L, 4 h |
| 15‐50 mg/kg, i.v, 5 days a week for 6w |
| ||
| 1‐10 μmol/L, 24 h |
| 15‐50 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 20d |
| ||
| 1‐30 μmol/L, 3.75‐24 h |
| 25‐100 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 21d |
| ||
| 1‐30 μmol/L, 15 min‐24 h |
| 30 mg/kg, oral, twice a day, 4d |
| ||
| 0‐3.125 μmol/L, 0‐48 h |
| 30‐90 mg/kg, i.p, once daily for 14d |
| ||
| 7.8 μmol/L, 48 h |
| 37.5‐150 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 7d |
| ||
| 10 μmol/L, 5 h |
| 50 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 24 h |
| ||
| 10‐30 μmol/L, 12 h |
| 50 mg/kg, oral, once daily for one month |
| ||
| 10‐40 μmol/L, 24‐48 h |
| 50 mg/kg, oral, single dose, 0.083‐24 h |
| ||
| 10‐100 μmol/L, 20 min |
| 50‐150 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 25d |
| ||
| 12.5‐50 μmol/L, 48 h |
| 50‐200 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 10d |
| ||
| 12.5‐50 μmol/L, 48 h |
| 70.05 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 4w |
| ||
| 12.5‐100 μmol/L, 24 h |
| 150 mg/kg, oral, once daily for 12w |
| ||
| 15.6‐93.8 μmol/L, 30 min |
| ||||
| 25‐50 μmol/L, 24 h |
| ||||
| 25‐150 μmol/L, 48 h |
| ||||
| 25.6 μmol/L (IC50) |
| ||||
| 30 μmol/L, 72 h |
| ||||
| 50 μmol/L, 0‐120s |
| ||||
| 50‐200 μmol/L, 30 min |
| ||||
| 62‐468 μmol/L, 0‐13.3 h |
|
Future prospects of coptisine
| Type | Future prospect |
|---|---|
| Cancer | 1) Cellular senescence of cancer cells |
| 2) Autophagy occurrence | |
| Inflammation | 1) Caspase‐1‐involved inflammasome activation |
| 2) Autophagy occurrence | |
| CADs | 1) Myocardial injury biomarkers |
| 2) Neurohormonal activation biomarkers | |
| 3) Oxidative/nitroxidative stress biomarkers | |
| 4) Autophagy occurrence |
Figure 6Recommendations for future investigations on coptisine. Once mitochondrion is damaged, PARK2 binds to PINK1 on the surface of mitochondrial and ubiquitinates mitochondrial outer membrane proteins, which then bind to SQSTM1, a receptor which can interact with LC3. The formation of autophagosome inhibits ROS, the overproduction of which causes NLRP3 inflammasome assembling and the downstream pyroptosis and inflammatory response