Literature DB >> 31621403

Patient preferences for attributes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

John Fp Bridges1, Marie de la Cruz2, Melissa Pavilack3, Emuella Flood2,3, Ellen M Janssen2, Nabil Chehab3, Ancilla W Fernandes3.   

Abstract

Aim: EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) vary in efficacy, side effects (SEs) and dosing regimen. We explored EGFR-TKI treatment attribute preferences in EGFR mutation-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials & methods: Patients completed a survey utilizing preference elicitation methods: direct elicitation of four EGFR-TKI profiles describing progression-free survival (PFS), severe SE risk, administration; discrete choice experiment involving 12 choice tasks.
Results: 90 participated. The preferred profile (selected 89% of times) had the longest PFS (18 months) and the lowest severe SE risk (5%). Patients would need compensation with ≥three-times longer PFS for severe SEs. Patients would accept ≤7 months PFS reduction for oral treatments versus intravenous.
Conclusion: Patients preferred longer PFS but were willing to accept reduced PFS for more favorable SEs and dosing convenience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE; EGFR; EGFR-TKIs; NSCLC; direct elicitation; patient preferences; treatment attributes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31621403     DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yasuo Sugitani; Naoko Sugitani; Shunsuke Ono
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The Importance of Disease-Free Survival as a Clinical Trial Endpoint: A Qualitative Study Among Canadian Survivors of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Bever; Jackie Manthorne; Tissa Rahim; Layla Moumin; Shelagh M Szabo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.

Authors:  Hannah Collacott; Vikas Soekhai; Caitlin Thomas; Anne Brooks; Ella Brookes; Rachel Lo; Sarah Mulnick; Sebastian Heidenreich
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Stated Preferences in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Isandra Meirelles; Carlos Magliano
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Differences in Lung Cancer Treatment Preferences Among Oncologists, Patients and Family Members: A Semi-Structured Qualitative Study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoning He; Mengqian Zhang; Jing Wu; Song Xu; Xiangli Jiang; Ziping Wang; Shucai Zhang; Feng Xie
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Patient and Caregiver Preferences for First-Line Treatments of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Candice Yong; M Janelle Cambron-Mellott; Brian Seal; Oliver Will; Martine C Maculaitis; Kelly Clapp; Emily Mulvihill; Ion Cotarla; Ranee Mehra
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.