Literature DB >> 31621091

A sparse orthogonal collimator for small animal intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Part II: hardware development and commissioning.

Kaley Woods1, Ryan Neph1, Dan Nguyen1, Ke Sheng1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A dose-modulation device for small animal radiotherapy is required to use clinically analogous treatment techniques, which will likely increase the translatability of preclinical research results. Because the clinically used multileaf collimator (MLC) is impractical for miniaturization, we have developed a simpler, better-suited sparse orthogonal collimator (SOC) for delivering small animal intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a rectangular aperture optimization (RAO) treatment planning system.
METHODS: The SOC system was modeled in computer-aided design software and fabricated with machined tungsten leaves and three-dimensional (3D) printed leaf housing. A graphical user interface was developed for controlling and calibrating the SOC leaves, which are driven by Arduino-controlled stepper motors. A Winston-Lutz test was performed to assess mechanical alignment, and abutting field and grid dose patterns were created to analyze intra- and intercalibration leaf positioning error. Leaf transmission and penumbra were measured over the full range of gantry angles and leaf positions, respectively. Three SOC test plans were delivered, and film measurements were compared to the intended dose distributions. The differences in maximum, mean, and minimum, as well as pixelwise absolute dose differences, were compared for each structure, and a gamma analysis was performed for the target structures using criteria of 4% dose difference and 0.3 mm distance to agreement.
RESULTS: The Winston-Lutz test revealed maximum directional offsets between the SOC and primary collimator axes of 0.53 mm at 0° and 0.68 mm over the full 360°. Upper and lower abutting field patterns had maximum dose deviations of 18.8 ± 3.1% and 15.5 ± 2.9%, respectively, and grid patterns showed intra- and intercalibration repeatability of 93% and 91%, respectively. Extremely low midleaf (0.15 ± 0.05%) and interleaf (0.27 ± 0.22%) transmission was measured, with no significant rotational variation. The average penumbra was ~0.8 mm for all leaves at field center, with a range of 0.17 mm for all leaf positions. A highly concave test plan was delivered with a ~ 95% gamma analysis pass rate, and a realistic mouse phantom liver irradiation plan achieved a pass rate of ~98%. A highly complex dose distribution was also created with 551 SOC apertures averaging 2.4 mm in size.
CONCLUSIONS: A sparse orthogonal collimator was developed and commissioned, with promising preliminary dosimetry results. The SOC design, with its limited moving components and high dose-modulation resolution, is ideal for delivering high-quality small animal IMRT with our RAO-based treatment planning system.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collimator; direct aperture optimization; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; preclinical research; small animal radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31621091      PMCID: PMC8030274          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  58 in total

1.  A novel software and conceptual design of the hardware platform for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Dan Ruan; Daniel O'Connor; Kaley Woods; Daniel A Low; Salime Boucher; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Irradiation in a flash: Unique sparing of memory in mice after whole brain irradiation with dose rates above 100Gy/s.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Kristoffer Petersson; Maud Jaccard; Gaël Boivin; Jean-François Germond; Benoit Petit; Raphaël Doenlen; Vincent Favaudon; François Bochud; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Incorporating cancer stem cells in radiation therapy treatment response modeling and the implication in glioblastoma multiforme treatment resistance.

Authors:  Victoria Y Yu; Dan Nguyen; Frank Pajonk; Patrick Kupelian; Tania Kaprealian; Michael Selch; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Development of a micro-computed tomography-based image-guided conformal radiotherapy system for small animals.

Authors:  Hu Zhou; Manuel Rodriguez; Fred van den Haak; Geoffrey Nelson; Rahil Jogani; Jiali Xu; Xinzhi Zhu; Yongjiang Xian; Phuoc T Tran; Dean W Felsher; Paul J Keall; Edward E Graves
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Combining radiotherapy and cancer immunotherapy: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Silvia C Formenti; Sandra Demaria
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Pre-treatment FDG-PET predicts the site of in-field progression following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Bilal Piperdi; Madhur K Garg; William R Bodner; Rasim Gucalp; Roman Perez-Soler; Steven M Keller; Chandan Guha
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 8.  Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?

Authors:  Jean Bourhis; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Claude Bailat; Benoît Petit; Jonathan Ollivier; Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi; Mahmut Ozsahin; François Bochud; Raphaël Moeckli; Jean-François Germond; Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Reirradiation for Recurrent Pancreas Cancer.

Authors:  Nergiz Dagoglu; Mark Callery; James Moser; Jennifer Tseng; Tara Kent; Andrea Bullock; Rebecca Miksad; Joseph D Mancias; Anand Mahadevan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.

Authors:  Angelia Tran; Jingjing Zhang; Kaley Woods; Victoria Yu; Dan Nguyen; Gary Gustafson; Lane Rosen; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  3 in total

1.  Small Animal IMRT Using 3D-Printed Compensators.

Authors:  Gage Redler; Erik Pearson; Xinmin Liu; Inna Gertsenshteyn; Boris Epel; Charles Pelizzari; Bulent Aydogan; Ralph Weichselbaum; Howard J Halpern; Rodney D Wiersma
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 8.013

2.  Quantitative Bioluminescence Tomography-Guided Conformal Irradiation for Preclinical Radiation Research.

Authors:  Xiangkun Xu; Zijian Deng; Hamid Dehghani; Iulian Iordachita; Michael Lim; John W Wong; Ken Kang-Hsin Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Feasibility of a Novel Sparse Orthogonal Collimator-Based Preclinical Total Marrow Irradiation for Enhanced Dosimetric Conformality.

Authors:  Amr M H Abdelhamid; Lu Jiang; Darren Zuro; An Liu; Srideshikan Sargur Madabushi; Hemendra Ghimire; Jeffrey Y C Wong; Simonetta Saldi; Christian Fulcheri; Claudio Zucchetti; Antonio Pierini; Ke Sheng; Cynthia Aristei; Susanta K Hui
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.