Literature DB >> 31620906

Does humic acid alter visually and chemically guided foraging in stickleback fish?

Robert B Mobley1, Emily G Weigel2, Janette W Boughman3.   

Abstract

Sensory systems function under the influence of multiple, interacting environmental properties. When environments change, so may perception through one or more sensory systems, as alterations in transmission properties may change how organisms obtain and use information. Humic acids, a natural and anthropogenically produced class of chemicals, have attributes that may change chemical and visual environments of aquatic animals, potentially with detrimental consequences on their ability to locate necessary resources. Here, we explore how environmental disturbance affects the way threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) use visual and olfactory information during foraging. We compared foraging behavior using visual, olfactory, and bimodal (visual and olfactory) information in the presence and absence of humic acids. We found evidence that humic acids reduced olfactory-based food detection. While visual perception was not substantially impaired by humic acids, the visual sense alone did not compensate for the loss of olfactory perception. These findings suggest that a suite of senses still may not be capable of compensating for the loss of information from individual modalities. Thus, senses may react disparately to rapid environmental change, and thereby push species into altered evolutionary trajectories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Habitat change; Humic acid; Multimodal shift; Olfaction; Vision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31620906     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-019-01319-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   2.899


  9 in total

1.  The merging of the senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell.

Authors:  P Dalton; N Doolittle; H Nagata; P A Breslin
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Flicking in the Lobster Homarus americanus: Recordings from Electrodes Implanted in Antennular Segments.

Authors:  K Berg; R Voigt; J Atema
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.818

4.  Habitat-dependent olfactory discrimination in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Meike Hiermes; Marion Mehlis; Ingolf P Rick; Theo C M Bakker
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Predator-prey interactions in a changing world: humic stress disrupts predator threat evasion in copepods.

Authors:  Mathieu Santonja; Laetitia Minguez; Mark O Gessner; Erik Sperfeld
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair.

Authors:  E B Taylor; J W Boughman; M Groenenboom; M Sniatynski; D Schluter; J L Gow
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Humic acid interferes with species recognition in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Niora J Fabian; Lindsey B Albright; Gabriele Gerlach; Heidi S Fisher; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  An increase in pH boosts olfactory communication in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Jan Heuschele; Ulrika Candolin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Do fish sniff? A new mechanism of olfactory sampling in pleuronectid flounders.

Authors:  G A Nevitt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  All day-long: Sticklebacks effectively forage on whitefish eggs during all light conditions.

Authors:  Jan Baer; Sarah Maria Gugele; Joachim Bretzel; J Tyrell DeWeber; Alexander Brinker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.