| Literature DB >> 31620109 |
Rushikesh Tambat1, Manoj Jangra1, Nisha Mahey1, Nishtha Chandal1, Manpreet Kaur1, Surbhi Chaudhary2, Dipesh Kumar Verma3, Krishan Gopal Thakur3, Manoj Raje2, Sanjay Jachak4, Neeraj Khatri5, Hemraj Nandanwar1.
Abstract
Efflux pumps are always at the forefront of bacterial multidrug resistance and account for the failure of antibiotics. The present study explored the potential of 2-(2-Aminophenyl) indole (RP2), an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) isolated from the soil bacterium, to overcome the efflux-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The RP2/antibiotic combination was tested against efflux pump over-expressed S. aureus strains. The compound was further examined for the ethidium bromide (EtBr) uptake and efflux inhibition assay (a hallmark of EPI functionality) and cytoplasmic membrane depolarization. The safety profile of RP2 was investigated using in vitro cytotoxicity assay and Ca2+ channel inhibitory effect. The in vivo efficacy of RP2 was studied in an animal model in combination with ciprofloxacin. RP2 exhibited the synergistic activity with several antibiotics in efflux pump over-expressed strains of S. aureus. In the mechanistic experiments, RP2 increased the accumulation of EtBr, and demonstrated the inhibition of its efflux. The antibiotic-EPI combinations resulted in extended post antibiotic effects as well as a decrease in mutation prevention concentration of antibiotics. Additionally, the in silico docking studies suggested the binding of RP2 to the active site of modeled structure of NorA efflux pump. The compound displayed low mammalian cytotoxicity and had no Ca2+ channel inhibitory effect. In ex vivo experiments, RP2 reduced the intracellular invasion of S. aureus in macrophages. Furthermore, the RP2/ciprofloxacin combination demonstrated remarkable efficacy in a murine thigh infection model. In conclusion, RP2 represents a promising candidate as bacterial EPI, which can be used in the form of a novel therapeutic regimen along with existing and upcoming antibiotics, for the eradication of S. aureus infections.Entities:
Keywords: combination therapy; efflux pump inhibitor; membrane potential; multidrug resistance; natural products; post-antibiotic effect; time-kill kinetics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31620109 PMCID: PMC6759831 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 12D structure of RP2.
MICs for numerous antibiotics against S. aureus efflux pump over-expressed/deletion strains in the absence and presence of RP2.
| Norfloxacin | 32 | 0.5 (32) | 0.265 | 0.25 | 0.125 (16) | 0.75 |
| 2 (16) | 0.1875 | 0.25 (8) | – | |||
| 4 (8) | 0.1875 | 0.25 (4) | – | |||
| 8 (4) | 0.281 | 0.25 (2) | – | |||
| Ciprofloxacin | 8 | 0.5 (32) | 0.3125 | 0.125 | 0.125 (16) | – |
| 1 (16) | 0.25 | 0.125 (8) | – | |||
| 4 (8) | 0.5625 | 0.125 (4) | – | |||
| Moxifloxacin | 0.25 | 0.0625 (32) | 0.375 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 (16) | – |
| 0.125 (16) | 0.625 | 0.0625 (8) | – | |||
| Chloramphenicol | 8 | 2 (32) | 0.375 | 2 | 2 (16) | – |
| 4 (16) | 0.625 | 2 (8) | – | |||
| RP2 | 128 | n/a | n/a | 64 | n/a | n/a |
| Tetracycline1/Erythromycin2 | 128 | 2 (32) | 0.265 | 128 | 4 (32) | 0.281 |
| 4 (16) | 0.156 | 16 (16) | 0.25 | |||
| 8 (8) | 0.125 | 32 (8) | 0.3125 | |||
| 32 (4) | 0.281 | 64 (4) | 0.531 | |||
| RP2 | 128 | n/a | n/a | 128 | n/a | n/a |
FIGURE 2Effect of RP2 on the accumulation of ethidium bromide by S. aureus: (A) SA-1199B, (B) XU212, and (C) RN4220-MsrA; the concentration of EtBr was 2 μg/mL for all the three tested strains. Assays were performed at 37°C in the presence and absence of glucose. Reserpine was used at 20 μg/mL as the positive control for S. aureus SA-1199B and XU212. (D) Time-kill curve of S. aureus SA-1199B, showing the bactericidal effect of ciprofloxacin in combination with RP2 at 32 μg/mL. Each time point represents the mean log10 CFU ± SD of three independent readings.
Relative Final Fluorescence (RFF) values based on the EtBr efflux inhibition for the S. aureus strains in the presence of the efflux inhibitors.
| RP2 | 32 | 11.51 ± 0.16∗∗∗ | 9.39 ± 0.08∗∗∗ | 8.69 ± 0.12∗∗∗ |
| 16 | 8.9 ± 0.14∗∗∗ | 6.8 ± 0.03∗∗∗ | 6.04 ± 0.12∗∗∗ | |
| 8 | 7.27 ± 0.14∗∗∗ | 4.61 ± 0.11∗∗∗ | 4.58 ± 0.06∗∗∗ | |
| 4 | 5.06 ± 0.07∗∗∗ | 2.86 ± 0.08∗∗ | 3.03 ± 0.1∗∗ | |
| Reserpine | 20 | 6.22 ± 0.11∗∗∗ | 2.97 ± 0.05∗∗ | NDa |
Mutation frequencies of S. aureus ATCC 25923.
| 0 | 5.5 × 10–8 | 3.9 × 10–8 | 1.8 × 10–8 | <10–8 | 5.6 × 10–8 | 4.8 × 10–8 | 2.5 × 10–8 | <10–8 | 6.9 × 10–8 | 5.1 × 10–8 | 3.5 × 10–8 | <10–8 |
| 16 | 3.6 × 10–8 | 1.5 × 10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | 2.7 × 10–8 | 1.3 × 10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | 3.6 × 10–8 | 1.4 × 10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 |
| 32 | <10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | 1.2 × 10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 | <10–8 |
PAE of ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and erythromycin alone and in combination with RP2 against S. aureus SA1199B, XU212 and RN4220-MsrA, respectively.
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.43 ± 0.14 | 1.05 ± 0.19 | 1.43 ± 0.16 | |
| Ciprofloxacin + RP2 (32 μg/mL) | 1.68 ± 0.13 | 2.15 ± 0.15 | 3.33 ± 0.18 | |
| Tetracycline | 0.76 ± 0.13 | 1.2 ± 0.17 | 2.1 ± 0.14 | |
| Tetracycline + RP2 (32 μg/mL) | 1.93 ± 0.12 | 2.45 ± 0.08 | 3.4 ± 0.25 | |
| Erythromycin | 0.46 ± 0.13 | 1.08 ± 0.17 | 1.82 ± 0.14 | |
| Erythromycin + RP2 (32 μg/mL) | 1.77 ± 0.12 | 2.24 ± 0.08 | 3.32 ± 0.25 | |
FIGURE 3Interaction of RP2 with the active site of NorA. (A) 3D electrostatic potential map and (B) cartoon representation (in rainbow color) of NorA showing RP2 (ball and stick representation in magenta) docked in the active site cleft. (C) The close view of NorA residues, in stick representation, and interacting with RP2. All 12 transmembrane helices of the protein have been colored in rainbow. (D) Ligand interaction diagram in 2D representation showing several interactions involved in NorA/RP2 binding.
FIGURE 4(A) Membrane depolarization. The relative red/green ratio of S. aureus SA-1199B using DIOC2 stained cells after 30 min of exposure to RP2 from 4 to 32 μg/mL. Green and red fluorescence correspond to the depolarized as well as polarized cells, respectively. The changes in the fluorescence were measured at an excitation/emission wavelength of 485/528 nm and 528/590 for green and red fluorescence, respectively. (B) Effect of RP2 on S. aureus ATP levels. S. aureus SA-1199B was exposed to RP2 at 1/4th MIC during 24 h. The ATP levels were quantified using a luciferin-luciferase bioluminescence detection assay. CCCP (2 μg/mL) was included for comparison. The results presented correspond to the mean of three independent readings ± SD. Results were considered highly significant where ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
FIGURE 5Mammalian calcium channel inhibition assays (A) Cytoplasmic Ca2+ measures of mock-treated cells with carbachol added at 60 s (B,C). Same as panel A except that cells were treated with verapamil (50 μg/mL) (C) or RP2 (32 μg/mL), at 45 s pre-carbachol treatment. The results presented correspond to the mean of three independent readings ± SD.
FIGURE 6(A) Cytotoxic effect of RP2 on THP-1, HEK-293T, and HEP G2 cell lines. The cells were exposed to RP2 (1000–62.5 μg/mL) during 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. The results presented correspond to the mean of three independent readings ± SD. (B) Hemolytic effect of RP2 (1000–62.5 μg/mL) on rabbit erythrocytes. Triton X-100 (0.1%) was included as a positive control. The results presented correspond to the mean of three independent readings ± SD. Results were considered highly significant where ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
FIGURE 7(A) Influence of RP2 (32 μg/mL) on the invasive abilities of S. aureus wild-type SA-1199, NorA over-producing S. aureus SA-1199B and the norA knock-out K1758. The results presented correspond to the mean of three independent readings ± SD. Results were considered significant when ∗P < 0.05 and highly significant when ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001. (B) Neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Single dose (subcutaneous; 4 h after infection, 6 mice per group) treatment with ciprofloxacin and RP2 alone and in combination against S. aureus SA-1199B; for drug-treated animals, thigh CFU was determined at 20 h after infection. For controls, CFU in thighs was estimated at 4 and 20 h after infection. The CFU from each thigh are plotted as individual points and error bars represent the SD within an experimental group.