Literature DB >> 31619834

Identifying High-Impact and Managing Low-Impact Assessment Practices.

Kristin K Janke1, Katherine A Kelley2, Beth A Martin3, Mary E Ray4, Burgunda V Sweet5.   

Abstract

Those in pharmacy education who are tasked with assessment may be overwhelmed by deadlines, data collection, and reporting, leaving little time to pause and examine the effectiveness of their efforts. However, assessment practices must be evaluated for their impact, including their ability to answer important questions, use resources effectively, and contribute to meaningful educational change. Often assessments are implemented, but then attention is diverted to another assessment before the data from the former assessment can be fully interpreted or used. To maximize the impact of assessment practices, tough and uncomfortable decisions may need to be made. In this paper, we suggest an approach for examining and making decisions about assessment activities and provide guidance on building high-impact assessment practices, evolving or "sunsetting" low-impact assessment practices, and managing mandated assessment.
© 2019 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Keywords:  assessment; curricular assessment; programmatic assessment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31619834      PMCID: PMC6788162          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

Review 1.  Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education.

Authors:  David A Cook; Georges Bordage; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Reenvisioning assessment for the Academy and the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's standards revision process.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Katherine A Kelley; Sarah E Kuba; Holly L Mason; Bruce A Mueller; Kimberly S Plake; Hazel H Seaba; Suzanne R Soliman; Burgunda V Sweet; Gary C Yee
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Cecilia M Plaza; Cindy D Stowe; Evan T Robinson; Gary DeLander; Diane E Beck; Russell B Melchert; Robert B Supernaw; Victoria F Roche; Brenda L Gleason; Mark N Strong; Amanda Bain; Gerald E Meyer; Betty J Dong; Jeffrey Rochon; Patty Johnston
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Assessment to transform competency-based curricula.

Authors:  Karen B Farris; Ada Demb; Kristin Kari Janke; Katherine Kelley; Steven A Scott
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Enacting Pedagogy in Curricula: On the Vital Role of Governance in Medical Education.

Authors:  Oscar Casiro; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  A Modified Delphi Process to Define Competencies for Assessment Leads Supporting a Doctor of Pharmacy Program.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Katherine A Kelley; Burgunda V Sweet; Sarah E Kuba
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Rethinking programme evaluation in health professions education: beyond 'did it work?'.

Authors:  Faizal Haji; Marie-Paule Morin; Kathryn Parker
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Greg L Alston; Eleanora Bird; Shauna M Buring; Katherine A Kelley; Nanci L Murphy; Lauren S Schlesselman; Cindy D Stowe; Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Importance of Teaching Ethics in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Brian L Erstad; Timothy P Stratton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.