| Literature DB >> 31619238 |
Archile Paguem1,2, Babette Abanda1,2, Dieudonné Ndjonka1, Judith Sophie Weber3, Sen Claudine Henriette Ngomtcho1,4, Kingsley Tanyi Manchang5, Mamoudou Adoulmoumini6, Albert Eisenbarth2,7, Alfons Renz2, Sørge Kelm3, Mbunkah Daniel Achukwi8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: African animal trypanosomosis remains the major constraint of livestock production and livelihood of pastoral communities in Cameroon. Despite several decades of vector and parasite control efforts, it has not been eradicated. Alternative and sustainable control strategies require a sound knowledge of the local species, strains and vectors. In the Sudano-Sahelian and Guinea Savannah of Cameroon the prevalence and genetic diversity of trypanosomes infecting cattle was investigated by microscopy of cattle blood buffy coat and molecular methods using generic primers targeting parts of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) and encoded glycosomal glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase-gene (gGAPDH).Entities:
Keywords: Cameroon; Co-endemic trypanosomes; ITS-1; T. Theileri; T. grayi; Trypanosomosis; gGAPDH
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31619238 PMCID: PMC6796345 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2111-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Effect of cattle breed on packed cell volume (a). Comparison of the mean of PCV of five indigenous cattle breeds examined. Effect of body condition score on packed cell volume (b). Animals were grouped as described in the section “Materials and Methods” without breed distinction and the PCVs were compared. Effect of age group on body condition score (c). Animal were grouped by age as described in in the section “Materials and Methods” and PCV was compared. Details of sample collections and processing are indicated in the section “Materials and Methods”
Distribution of trypanosome species detected by microscopy in the study area
| Trypanosome species | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sites | N | Negatives |
|
|
| ||||||
| Vina | 265 | 259 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 |
| Faro et Deo | 196 | 165 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 15.8 |
| Mayo-Rey | 316 | 305 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3.5 |
| Faro | 176 | 168 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4.5 |
| Total | 953 | 897 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 5.9 |
Tb: T. brucei, Tb-like: T. brucei-like, Tc: T. congolense, Tv: T. vivax. Animals from Mayo Tsanaga area were not considered because microscopy data collection was not carried out at this location and one positive animal suspected to be hybrid was not included in this table
Distribution of trypanosome species detected by ITS-1 PCR in the study areas
| Trypanosome species | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sites | N | Negatives |
|
|
|
|
|
| prevalence (%) | |||||
| Vina | 283 | 131 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 53.7 |
| Faro et Deo | 196 | 80 | 4 | 29 | 6 | 28 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 59.2 |
| Mayo-Rey | 316 | 157 | 36 | 39 | 6 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50.3 |
| Faro | 176 | 116 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 34.1 |
| Mayo Tsanaga | 205 | 66 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 67.8 |
| Total | 1176 | 550 | 63 | 78 | 17 | 334 | 5 | 3 | 91 | 7 | 1 | 23 | 4 | 53.2 |
Tb: T. brucei, Tc: T. congolense, Tth: T. theileri / T. grayi, Tv: T. vivax
Comparison of the diagnostic test results obtained by parasite microscopy and molecular (ITS-1 PCR) methods
| PCR | Total |
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Negatives | overlap (%) | ||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 43.8 |
|
| 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 88.9 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100.0 | |
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 72.7 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 83.3 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0 | |
| Negatives | 47 | 72 | 8 | 206 | 3 | 14 | 64 | 3 | 468 | 885 | 47.1 |
| Total | 50 | 81 | 13 | 219 | 3 | 17 | 71 | 3 | 483 | 940 | 48.6 |
Tb: T. brucei, Tc: T. congolense, Tth: T. theileri / T. grayi, Tv: T. vivax. T. spp: T. all species Animals from Mayo Tsanaga region were not considered because microscopy was not carried out at this location. Only the animals with parasitological and molecular data were considered
Trypanosome ITS-1 amplicon sizes of different Trypanosoma spp.
| Amplicon size (bp) | |
|---|---|
|
| 640 |
|
|
|
|
| 562 |
|
|
|
|
| 426 |
|
| 426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bold lettered species were found in this study
asource: Adams et al. [19]
bNgomtcho et al. [24]
Effect of age, breed, study areas and body condition score on trypanosome prevalence
| Factors | Prevalence by PCR |
| Prevalence by PCR |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | overall (%) | Pathogenic (Tc + Tv + Tb) (%) | |||||
| Age | |||||||
| Young (0–2.5) | 171 | 92 (53.8) | 54 (31.6) | ||||
| Mature (3–5) | 574 | 332 (57.8) | 11.93 | 0.003 | 159 (27.7)* | 13.68 | 0.001 |
| Old (6–12) | 431 | 202 (46.9)* | 83 (19.3)* | ||||
| Body condition | |||||||
| Poor (0–2) | 148 | 80 (54.1) | 52 (35.1) | ||||
| Good (3–4) | 967 | 516 (53.4) | 0.449 | 0.799 | 220 (22.8)* | 17.31 | 0.000 |
| Very good (5) | 61 | 30 (49.2) | 24 (39.3) | ||||
| PCV | |||||||
| PCV < 25 | 109 | 64 (58.7) | 1.931 | 0.165 | 49 (45.0) | 18.476 | 0.000 |
| PCV > 25 | 944 | 488 (51.7) | 241 (25.5)* | ||||
| Sex | |||||||
| Male | 283 | 147 (22.4) | 84 (29.7) | 5.76 | 0.018 | ||
| Female | 968 | 510 (77.6) | 0.048 | 0.439 | 220 (22.7)* | ||
| Breed | |||||||
| Gudali | 649 | 351 (54.1) | 185 (28.5)* | ||||
| White Fulani | 60 | 35 (58.3) | 30 (50.0) | ||||
| Red Fulani | 57 | 30 (52.6) | 46.79 | 0.000 | 23 (40.4)* | 58.19 | 0.000 |
| Namchi (Doayo) | 205 | 71 (34.6)* | 34 (16.6)* | ||||
| Kapsiki | 205 | 139 (67.8)* | 24 (11.7)* | ||||
| Areas | |||||||
| Vina | 283 | 152 (53.7)* | 22 (7.8)* | ||||
| Faro et Deo | 196 | 116 (59.2) | 88 (44.9) | ||||
| Mayo Rey | 316 | 159 (50.3)* | 47.28 | 0.000 | 135 (42.7) | 166.41 | 0.000 |
| Faro | 176 | 60 (34.1)* | 27 (15.3)* | ||||
| Mayo Tsanaga | 205 | 139 (67.8) | 24 (11.7)* | ||||
Symbols: (*) indicates difference between variables
Fig. 2Molecular phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method based on the gGAPDH–encoding gene sequence as detailed under “Material and Methods”. It contains an alignment of 535 bp stretches of 37 sequences obtained in this study plus reference sequences [HQ664796; FM164792; HQ664805; HQ664784, HQ664792; HF545654; FM164789; XM_840453; FN400713] retrieved from Garcia et al. [29] and Hamilton et al. [23]. The bootstrap support values (> 70% in 1000 replications) are shown for the nodes
Fig. 3Effect of the species of trypanosomes detected by PCR on the Packed Cell Volume (PCV). Mixed infection is defined as the combination of at least two trypanosome species identified in the same animal. Details of sample collections and processing are indicated in the section “Materials and Methods”
Fig. 4Distribution of Salivaria (T. brucei, T. vivax and T. congolense) and Stercoraria (T. theileri/T. grayi) in tsetse free and tsetse infested areas in Northern Cameroon. Details of sample collections and processing are indicated in the section “Materials and Methods”.(map depicted in Fig. 4 is from our own)
Fig. 5Map of the study area. Geographic map showing five Agro-Ecological Zones of Cameroon (based on information from the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, IRAD, 2009). The cattle sampling areas (red stars) were located in the climate zones Guinea wet savannah and Sudano-Sahelian dry savannah. (map depicted in Fig. 5 is from our own)
Generic Primers used for PCR amplification
| Primers | 5′- 3′ sequence | Sequence length (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| ITS1-OutFa | CTTTGCTGCGTTCTT | 660–180 |
| ITS1-OutRa | TGCAATTATTGGTCGCGC | |
| ITS1-InFa | TAGAGGAAGCAAAAG | |
| ITS1-InRa | AAGCCAAGTCATCCATCG | |
| gGAPDH-OutFb | TTYGCCGYATYGGYCGCATGG | 900 |
| gGAPDH-OutRb | ACMAGRTCCACCACRCGGTG | |
| gGAPDH-InFb | CGCGGATCCASGGYCTYMTCGGBAMKGAGAT | |
| gGAPDH-InRb | GTTYTGCAGSGTCGCCTTGG |
Primer. In: inner primer, Out: outer primer, F: forward, R: reverse,
aAdams et al. [19]
bHamilton et al. [23]