Literature DB >> 6131590

A comparative evaluation of the parasitological techniques currently available for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis in cattle.

J Paris, M Murray, F McOdimba.   

Abstract

The parasitological techniques currently in use for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis were compared in a series of experiments for their capacity to detect Trypanosoma congolense, T. vivax and T. brucei in the blood of cattle. The darkground/phase contrast buffy coat method proved to be more sensitive than the haematocrit centrifugation technique, thick, thin and wet blood films in detecting T. congolense and T. vivax. On the other hand with T. brucei, mouse inoculation was the most sensitive method, followed by the haematocrit centrifugation technique. In a further series of experiments involving cattle infected with either T. congolense or T. vivax, the darkground/phase contrast buffy coat method was consistently more sensitive in detecting parasites than haematocrit centrifugation, capillary concentration using glycerol and miniature anion-exchange/centrifugation techniques. As well as showing superior sensitivity, the darkground/phase contrast buffy coat method allowed species identification, estimation of parasitaemia and simultaneous assessment of anaemia (packed red cell volume).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6131590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  41 in total

1.  Differences in sensitivity of Kenyan Trypanosoma vivax populations to the prophylactic and therapeutic actions of isometamidium chloride in Boran cattle.

Authors:  A S Peregrine; S K Moloo; D D Whitelaw
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Trypanosomosis of cattle in selected districts of Awi zone, northwestern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Nigatu Kebede; Abebe Animut
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Multiple drug-resistant bovine trypanosomes in South Darfur Province, Sudan.

Authors:  M M Mohamed-Ahmed; A H Rahman; E I Abdel Karim
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Sheep trypanosomiasis in Somalia.

Authors:  M F Dirie; M A Wardhere; M A Farah
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  A preliminary comparative study of a dipstick colloidal dye immunoassay and two antigen-detection ELISAs for diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection in cattle.

Authors:  Y Kashiwazaki; R Kanitpun; P Suteeraparp; S Boonchit
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Comparative evaluation of the antibody-detection ELISA technique using microplates precoated with denatured crude antigens from Trypanosoma congolense or Trypanosoma vivax.

Authors:  J W Magona; J S P Mayende; J Walubengo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Trypanosomosis prevalence in natural field-based infection: insights into systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from 1980 to 2018 on The Gambian ruminants with special emphasis on cattle.

Authors:  Olawale Festus Olaniyan; Ibrahim Kaya; Arss Secka
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Susceptibility of different breeds of goats in Kenya to experimental infection with Trypanosoma congolense.

Authors:  D D Whitelaw; G P Kaaya; J E Moulton; S K Moloo; M Murray
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  A large-scale trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 1% pour-on formulation of cyfluthrin (Cylence, Bayer) in controlling bovine trypanosomosis in Eastern Zambia.

Authors:  P Van den Bossche; L Munsimbwe; J Mubanga; R Jooste; D Lumamba
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.559

10.  Inhibition of growth of Trypanosoma brucei parasites in chronic infections.

Authors:  C M Turner; N Aslam; S D Angus
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.289

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.