| Literature DB >> 31618997 |
Thilina L Gunathilaka1, Kalpa W Samarakoon2, P Ranasinghe3, L Dinithi C Peiris4.
Abstract
Obesity and diabetes are major metabolic disorders which are prevalent worldwide. Algae has played an important role in managing these disorders. In this study, Gracilaria edulis, a marine red algae, was investigated for antioxidant and hypoglycemic potential using in vitro models. De-polysaccharide methanol extract of G. edulis was sequentially partitioned with hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and antioxidants, and hypoglycemic potentials were evaluated using multiple methods. High antioxidant potential was observed in the ethyl acetate fraction in terms of ferric reducing antioxidant power, iron chelating, and DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities, while the crude methanol extract exhibited potent oxygen radical-absorbance capacity. Potent α-amylase inhibitory activity was observed in the ethyl acetate fraction, while the ethyl acetate fraction was effective against α-glucosidase inhibition. Glucose diffusion was inhibited by the ethyl acetate fraction at 180 min, and the highest antiglycation activity was observed in both chloroform and ethyl acetate fractions. Additionally, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of the ethyl acetate fraction revealed the presence of several potent anti-diabetic compounds. In conclusion, G. edulis exhibited promising antidiabetic potential via multiple mechanisms. The ethyl acetate fraction exhibited the strongest hypoglycemic and antiglycation potential among the four fractions, and hence the isolation of active compounds is required to develop leads for new drugs to treat diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Gracillaria edulis; antiglycation; fractionation; glucose diffusion; methanol extract; α-amylase; α-glucosidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31618997 PMCID: PMC6832495 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24203708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phenol, flavonoid, and alkaloid contents of crude methanol extract and fractions of Gracillaria edulis.
| Extract/Fraction | TPC | TFC | Total Alkaloids |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude methanol extract | 1007.81 ± 54.21 a | 541.02 ± 51.84 a | 7177.72 ± 63.04 a |
| Hexane fraction | 760.85 ± 37.75 b | 688.60 ± 9.55 a | 1656.97 ± 45.80 b |
| Chloroform fraction | 560.85 ± 55.08 c | 289.39 ± 9.55 b | 2875.54 ± 22.29 c |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 2414.51 ± 50.34 d | 1461.49 ± 75.22 c | 1073.75 ± 45.88 b |
| Aqueous fraction | 1704.69 ± 43.16 e | 786.95 ± 62.04 d | 522.34 ± 67.13 d |
TPC: total phenol content; TFC: total flavonoid content; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent; PE: Piperine equivalent. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Mean values in a column superscripted by different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
IC50 values of methanol extract of G. edulis and fractions against antioxidant activity and activities equivalent to standards.
| Extract/ | IC50 (mg/mL) | Activity Equivalent to Standard (mg TE/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | ABTS | FICA | FRAP | ORAC | |
| Crude methanol extract | 3.19 ± 0.02 a | 0.56 ± 0.01 a | 9.23 ± 0.19 a | 0.26 ± 0.03 a | 1.61 ± 0.19 a |
| Hexane fraction | 6.22 ± 0.01 b | 0.54 ± 0.01 b | 2.58 ± 0.03 bc | 1.93 ± 0.35 b | 0.57 ± 0.07 bc |
| Chloroform fraction | 3.29 ± 0.02 c | 0.44 ± 0.01 c | 2.43 ± 0.01 c | 2.19 ± 0.23 b | 0.77 ± 0.05 b |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 3.17 ± 0.04 a | 0.41 ± 0.02 d | 2.22 ± 0.01 bc | 8.51 ± 0.09 c | 1.44 ± 0.29 a |
| Aqueous fraction | 3.91 ± 0.03 d | 0.45 ± 0.03 c | 2.71 ± 0.02 b | 1.23 ± 0.21 d | 0.44 ± 0.09 c |
| Trolox (standard) | 0.011 ± 0.00 e | 0.008 ± 0.00 e | - | - | - |
| EDTA (standard) | - | - | 0.019 ± 00 d | - | - |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 4. DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazine); ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)); FICA (ferrous iron chelating activity); FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant powder); ORAC (oxygen radical absorbance capacity); EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid); TE (Trolox equivalent). Mean values in a column superscripted by different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure A1Dose dependent DPPH (1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazine) radical scavenging activity of methanol extract and fractions of Gracillaria edulis. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).
Figure A2Percentage inhibition of α-amylase by G. edulis methanol extract and its fractions. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).
IC50 values exhibited by G. edulis methanol extract and methanol fractions against the inhibitory activity of the enzymes α-amylase and α-glucosidase and antiglycation activities.
| Extract/Fraction | Alpha-Amylase | Alpha-Glucosidase | Anti-Glycation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude methanol extract | 349.59 ± 2.44 a | 102.24 ± 0.89 a | 702.33 ± 12.72 a |
| Hexane fraction | 393.04 ± 4.73 b | 163.90 ± 5.23 b | 637.53 ± 6.21 b |
| Chloroform fraction | 322.71 ± 4.80 c | 122.65 ± 2.37 c | 258.23 ± 3.24 c |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 279.48 ± 5.62 d | 87.92 ± 1.62 d | 586.54 ± 4.37 b |
| Aqueous fraction | 376.49 ± 12.14 e | 148.57 ± 1.87 e | 723.78 ± 12.81 d |
| Acarbose (standard) | 87.43 ± 0.59 f | 0.38 ± 0.06 f | - |
| Rutin (standard) | - | - | 11.55 ± 0.82 e |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4). *p < 0.05 compared with the respective standard. Mean values in a column superscripted by different letters (a–f) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure A3Dose–response relationship of methanol extract and its fractions of G. edulis for anti glucosidase activity. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).
Figure 1Effect of methanol extract and fractions of G. edulis (1000 µg/mL) on glucose diffusion through dialysis membrane compared to the standard acarbose and control. Data presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 4).
Effect of methanol extract and its fractions of Gracillaria edulis (1000 µg/mL) on glucose diffusion.
| Time | Glucose Concentration (µg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Standard (Acarbose) | Methanol Extract | Hexane Fraction | Chloroform Fraction | Ethyl Acetate Fraction | Aqueous Fraction | |
| 30 | 14.32 ± 0.77 a | 1.72 ± 0.34 b | 3.51 ± 0.47 b | 12.26 ± 1.96 a | 7.09 ± 0.82 c | 2.96 ± 0.47 b | 7.43 ± 0.59 c |
| 60 | 23.41 ± 1.01 a | 5.09 ± 0.72 b | 11.77 ± 0.47 c | 20.66 ± 1.97 a | 15.22 ± 1.13 d | 10.67 ± 0.75 c | 11.64 ± 1.62 c |
| 90 | 30.58 ± 1.14 a | 8.19 ± 0.47 b | 22.73 ± 0.57 c | 27.89 ± 1.13 d | 22.59 ± 1.12 c | 15.91 ± 0.61 e | 29.13 ± 0.79 a,d |
| 120 | 42.43 ± 1.54 a | 13.15 ± 0.61 b | 33.75 ± 0.79 c | 40.57 ± 1.44 a | 36.98 ± 1.19 e | 23.07 ± 2.02 d | 36.09 ± 1.54 c,e |
| 150 | 48.90 ± 1.22 a | 18.87 ± 0.57 b | 42.08 ± 1.37 c | 46.42 ± 0.91 d | 41.25 ± 0.61 c | 27.55 ± 0.59 e | 47.25 ± 1.35 a,d |
| 180 | 57.65 ± 1.67 a | 22.79 ± 0.47 b | 48.36 ± 1.04 c | 52.01 ± 0.96 d | 49.04 ± 0.67 c | 38.15 ± 1.11 e | 52.69 ± 1.31 d |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Mean values in a column superscripted by different letters (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Dose–response relationship of methanol extract and its fractions of G. edulis for antiglycation activity determined by glucose-induced protein glycation and formation of protein-bound fluorescent advanced glycation end products. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).
Figure 3Chromatograms obtained from the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the ethyl acetate fraction of G. edulis.
Active compounds identified in the ethyl acetate fraction of G. edulis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis.
| Retention Time and % | Name | Molecular Formula | Compound Class | Reported Biological Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.956 | 2,5-Dimethylhexane-2,5-dihydroperoxide | C8H18O4 | Organic compound | Anti-inflammatory Antioxidant [ |
| 55.726 | Phthalic acid-6-ethyloct-3-yl 2-ethylhexyl ester | C26H42O4 | Phthalic acid derivative | Anticancer Antimicrobial [ |
| 66.305 | 1 | C19H20FNO3 | Indole derivative | Antidiabetic [ |
| 72.446 | 1,2-dimethoxy-4 (1,3-dimethoxy-1-propenyl) benzene | C13H18O4 | Benzene derivatives | Antifungal [ |
| 73.130 | Benz(b)1,4-oxazepine-4 (5 | C11H13NOS | Benzoxazepine derivatives | Anti-inflammatory Antimicrobial [ |
| 76.925 | 2-acetoxymethyl-3-(methoxycarbonyl)biphenylene | C17H14O4 | Biphenyl derivatives | Antibacterial [ |