Zijie Zheng1, Ganhua Luo1, Xinchong Shi1, Yali Long1, Wanqing Shen1, Zhoulei Li2, Xiangsong Zhang3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zhoulei.li@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zhxiangs@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Traditional treatment regimens for advanced prostate cancer, especially castration-resistant prostate cancer, result in low survival times with severe side effects. Therefore, new treatment options are required. Vitamin C (VC) has been identified as a promising anti-cancer agent of which the effects depend on the accumulation of H2O2 that is produced through autoxidation. Sulfasalazine (SAS), a cystine transporter (Xc-) inhibitor, is known to suppress cellular glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis. Here, we hypothesized that targeting the Xc- transporter via SAS may improve the anti-cancer activity of VC through regulating GSH biosynthesis, which in turn may result in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). METHODS: The anti-cancer effect of VC and/or SAS on prostate cancer cells was assessed using WST-8, colony formation and annexin V-FITC/PI FACS assays. Changes in cellular ROS and GSH levels were determined to verify our hypothesis. Finally, BALB/c nude mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts were used to assess the anti-cancer effects of single or combined VC and SAS therapies. RESULTS: We found that SAS could potentiate the short- and long-term cytotoxicity of VC in prostate cancer cells. We also found that the synergistic effect of SAS and VC led to significant cellular GSH depletion, resulting in increased ROS accumulation. This synergistic effect could be reversed by the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). The synergistic effect of SAS and VC was also noted in prostate cancer xenografts and correlated with immunohistochemistry results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results strongly indicate that SAS, a relatively non-toxic drug that targets cystine transporters, in combination with VC may be superior to their single applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Traditional treatment regimens for advanced prostate cancer, especially castration-resistant prostate cancer, result in low survival times with severe side effects. Therefore, new treatment options are required. Vitamin C (VC) has been identified as a promising anti-cancer agent of which the effects depend on the accumulation of H2O2 that is produced through autoxidation. Sulfasalazine (SAS), a cystine transporter (Xc-) inhibitor, is known to suppress cellular glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis. Here, we hypothesized that targeting the Xc- transporter via SAS may improve the anti-cancer activity of VC through regulating GSH biosynthesis, which in turn may result in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). METHODS: The anti-cancer effect of VC and/or SAS on prostate cancer cells was assessed using WST-8, colony formation and annexin V-FITC/PI FACS assays. Changes in cellular ROS and GSH levels were determined to verify our hypothesis. Finally, BALB/c nude mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts were used to assess the anti-cancer effects of single or combined VC and SAS therapies. RESULTS: We found that SAS could potentiate the short- and long-term cytotoxicity of VC in prostate cancer cells. We also found that the synergistic effect of SAS and VC led to significant cellular GSH depletion, resulting in increased ROS accumulation. This synergistic effect could be reversed by the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). The synergistic effect of SAS and VC was also noted in prostate cancer xenografts and correlated with immunohistochemistry results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results strongly indicate that SAS, a relatively non-toxic drug that targets cystine transporters, in combination with VC may be superior to their single applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Authors: Vishal S Narang; Giovanni M Pauletti; Peter W Gout; Donna J Buckley; Arthur R Buckley Journal: Chemotherapy Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 2.544
Authors: Qi Chen; Michael Graham Espey; Andrew Y Sun; Chaya Pooput; Kenneth L Kirk; Murali C Krishna; Deena Beneda Khosh; Jeanne Drisko; Mark Levine Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-08-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jihye Yun; Edouard Mullarky; Changyuan Lu; Kaitlyn N Bosch; Adam Kavalier; Keith Rivera; Jatin Roper; Iok In Christine Chio; Eugenia G Giannopoulou; Carlo Rago; Ashlesha Muley; John M Asara; Jihye Paik; Olivier Elemento; Zhengming Chen; Darryl J Pappin; Lukas E Dow; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Steven S Gross; Lewis C Cantley Journal: Science Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Daniel A Monti; Edith Mitchell; Anthony J Bazzan; Susan Littman; George Zabrecky; Charles J Yeo; Madhaven V Pillai; Andrew B Newberg; Sandeep Deshmukh; Mark Levine Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.240