Literature DB >> 31615417

RADseq population genomics confirms divergence across closely related species in blue coral (Heliopora coerulea).

Akira Iguchi1,2, Yuki Yoshioka3, Zac H Forsman4, Ingrid S S Knapp4, Robert J Toonen4, Yuki Hongo5, Satoshi Nagai5, Nina Yasuda6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heliopora coerulea, the blue coral, is the octocoral characterized by its blue skeleton. Recently, two Heliopora species were delimited by DNA markers: HC-A and HC-B. To clarify the genomic divergence of these Heliopora species (HC-A and HC-B) from sympatric and allopatric populations in Okinawa, Japan, we used a high throughput reduced representation genomic DNA sequencing approach (ezRAD).
RESULTS: We found 6742 biallelic SNPs shared among all target populations, which successfully distinguished the HC-A and HC-B species in both the sympatric and allopatric populations, with no evidence of hybridization between the two. In addition, we detected 410 fixed SNPs linking functional gene differences, including heat resilience and reproductive timing, between HC-A and HC-B.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed clear genomic divergence between Heliopora species and found possible genes related to stress-responses and reproduction, which may shed light on the speciation process and ecological divergence of coral species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coral; Ecological divergence; Speciation; Transcriptome

Year:  2019        PMID: 31615417      PMCID: PMC6794731          DOI: 10.1186/s12862-019-1522-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Evol Biol        ISSN: 1471-2148            Impact factor:   3.260


Background

Reef-building corals are morphologically and ecologically diverse and per unit area the reefs they form support more species than any other marine ecosystems [1]. Coral reefs are also among the most threatened ecosystems from direct and indirect anthropogenic pressures [2, 3]. Heliopora coerulea, the blue coral, is the only octocoral to form a massive structure like scleractinians and due to its characteristic blue skeleton it is also harvested for the aquarium, jewelry and curio trade. The blue coral is also only found in the shallow waters of the Indo-Pacific, making it particularly susceptible to long-term climate change and local anthropogenic impacts [4, 5]. Species delineation is one of the most fundamental issues when assessing conservation and biodiversity strategies, but morphological species identification of reef-building corals is often problematic due to their high plasticity and limited number of species-specific features [6], which is also applicable to octocorals [7]. Molecular techniques provide approaches to better inform these phylogenetic relationships in corals (e.g., [8-10]). However, these molecular studies often suffer from a paucity of relevant markers to elucidate detailed evolutionary processes in corals (reviewed by [11]). In particular, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), is often used to infer inter- and intra-specific differences in many animal species (reviewed in [12, 13]); however, it has slow mutation rates in corals [14, 15]. Species delineation is particularly difficult with closely related corals because of interspecific hybridization, recent speciation, shared ancestral polymorphisms, and/or extremely high intra-specific morphological variation [16-22]. Nuclear markers have sometimes been more useful and have played an important role in understanding the phylogenetic and geographic relationships of corals (e.g., [7, 18, 23–26]). However, inadequate taxonomy, discord between nuclear and mitochondrial results, hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting, cryptic species, and difficulty in distinguishing population level genetic structure from species level genetic structure all complicate efforts to resolve species boundaries in corals (e.g., [21, 27–29], reviewed by [30]). The development of high-throughput reduced representation genomic DNA sequencing provides the opportunity to easily examine hundreds to thousands of nuclear markers as short loci or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). RADseq has also been applied to octocorals [22, 31]. There are now several RADseq protocols making it easier and cost-effective to perform SNP analyses on non-model organisms including corals (e.g., [32-35]). In this study, we applied the ezRAD [32, 36] approach to examine two closely related groups of Heliopora (Pallas 1766) corals on the southern reef of Okinawa, Japan, which reproduce at different times [37] and are often found in different habitats [38]. These two Heliopora species were recently delimited by microsatellite markers [25] and the ITS2 region [26]: HC-A and HC-B. This study aims to expand on this previous work to search for biallelic fixed SNPs in functional genes to further clarify the relationship between these octocoral Heliopora species.

Methods

Sampling, DNA extraction and library preparation

We selected four populations of two Heliopora spp. (each population was collected from two allopatric sites and one sympatric site; Fig. 1). The coral fragments (1–2 cm) were collected either by snorkeling or on SCUBA (depth: 0.8–7.8 m) as described in [25] under a permission from Okinawa Prefecture (26–10). Genomic DNA was extracted immediately after sampling of coral fragments with a Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit. Each of the four populations had twelve individuals (Table 1), which were quantified with the Accuclear Ultra High Sensitivity dsDNA kit before pooling equimolarly. DNA samples from 12 individuals in each site were pooled and used for the following analyses. The four libraries were prepared following the ezRAD protocol [36] using Illumina TruSeq library preparation kit, and following bioanalyzer and qPCR quality control steps were run as paired-end (2 × 300 bp) reads on the Illumina Miseq sequencer.
Fig. 1

Sampling locations of Heliopora species used in this study

Table 1

Summary of used samples in this study

Allopatric HC-AAllopatric HC-BSympatric HC-ASympatric HC-B
No. of individuals12121212
No. of reads (paired-end, forward)4,552,2183,585,9194,599,5203,793,508
No. of reads (paired-end, reverse)5,022,7633,974,3095,084,2024,193,414
Sampling locations of Heliopora species used in this study Summary of used samples in this study

Bioinformatics analysis

The FASTQ files, with an average of 8.7 million 300 bp reads per paired-end population, were filtered with the FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/) to discard reads with poor quality bases (Q < 20) and less than 25 bp in length. To increase the efficiency of mapping against transcriptome data, we prepared fasta files consisting of 50 bp size sequences from filtered fastq files above. In order to call SNPs in putative protein coding regions from the coral host, we aligned the fasta files to the transcriptome data of coral host Heliopora coerulea [39] with bowtie2 by using the default setting [40]. This process excludes contaminated sequences from other micro-organisms for the following analyses. With the subsequent SAM files, we called SNPs with Stacks (programs: pstacks (default setting), cstacks (−b 1 -p 4 -n 3), sstacks (−b 1 -p 4), and genotypes (−b 1) [41];). Short read data is available from the accession No. DRA008338 (DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ)). Based on catalog files made by Stacks, we prepared input files including only biallelic SNPs loci among 4 populations using parsing scripts by R ([42]; Additional file 1) for the following analyses. Based on the biallelic SNPs data, hierarchical clustering of the number of loci, in which two populations share the same allelic compositions and heat map visualization, were performed using heatmap.2 in the gplots ver. 3.0.1 package in R [43]. Venn diagram was drawn using VennDiagram ver. 1.6.17 package in R. We also performed a maximum likelihoood (ML) analysis with RAxML ver. 8.2.7 [44] using NEXUS file including concatenated biallelic SNPs data. For the analysis, we used the GTR-GAMMA model and 1000 bootstrap replicates to estimate the clade confidences. Using short sequences obtained by Stacks including SNPs that were alternately fixed between types (HC-A and HC-B) found by parsing scripts by R (Additional file 1), we performed BLASTN analysis (e-value cut-off: 1e− 5) against transcriptome sequences of H. coerulea published in a previous study [39] and obtained annotation information for each SNP. We performed all data processing and analyses using the supercomputer of the National Institute of Genetics (Mishima, Shizuoka, Japan).

Results and discussion

The ezRAD libraries yielded on average 8.7 million 300 bp reads per population (Table 1). After excluding contaminated sequences by using transcriptome data of H. coerulea, we succeeded in detecting 6742 variable biallelic SNPs shared among all 4 of the pooled populations. The number of loci at which pools of individuals shared the same nucleotide was higher within species (3199 and 3631 in HC-A and HC-B, respectively) than between species (2556–2750) regardless of locations (Fig. 2, Additional file 2). Based on the SNP polymorphisms, the dendrogram indicates that the HC-A and HC-B species remain clearly distinguished regardless of whether they were collected from sympatric or allopatric populations (Fig. 3). This distinction supports the previous population genetic analyses using microsatellite and ITS2 markers [26], indicating that, even in sympatric environments, there is either striking selection or no hybridization between HC-A and HC-B as suggested in previous studies [25, 26]. But considering that we used pooled RAD-seq samples, individual based analysis would be necessary in the future [45].
Fig. 2

Heat map of the number of loci in which two populations share the same allele compositions

Fig. 3

Dendrogram of the four populations of Heliopora libraries. The node values show ML-bootstrap percentage and the values above the branches are genetic distances (substitutions/site)

Heat map of the number of loci in which two populations share the same allele compositions Dendrogram of the four populations of Heliopora libraries. The node values show ML-bootstrap percentage and the values above the branches are genetic distances (substitutions/site) In addition to the population genetic distinction, we also detected 410 fixed different SNPs in sequences obtained by Stacks between the two species (HC-A and HC-B). A BLAST search revealed matches to 314 annotated genes from the coral host (almost all e-values <1e− 10; Additional file 3). The BLAST results included genes related to stress responses such as thioredoxin [46], ubiquitin-protein ligase [47, 48], and cryptochrome-1 as a candidate gene (Table 2) although these SNPs were located at synonymous positions. Bay et al. [47] reported that SNP mutation in cryptochrome-1 was potentially linked to heat resistance in populations of Acropora hyacinthus. In the well-developed fringing reef, HC-A is more commonly found on the colder outer reef slope compared to HC-B, which resides in warmer shallower waters. Indeed, distribution of HC-A is also further north than that of HC-B [49]. In addition, after a mass bleaching event in 2017, more HC-B survived than HC-A in Sekisei Lagoon (H. Kurihara and N. Yasuda unpublished data). Thus, the fixed nucleotide differences between HC-A and HC-B provide hypotheses for the underlying mechanisms of differential stress tolerances observed between these species. This stress tolerance should be further examined, because the resilience of these two Heliopora species to long-term climate change will likely differ and be an important component of future conservation and management strategies.
Table 2

Selected candidate genes for ecological divergence of Heliopora species

Contig IDAccession numberAnnotate descriptionOrigine speicesAccession numberIdentity (%)E-valueBit score
c101459_g1_i1IABP01020958PREDICTED: dopamine receptor 2-like Acropora digitifera XP_015754865.143.642.00E-2199.4
c114522_g1_i1IABP01022095PREDICTED: LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF103-like Acropora digitifera XP_015753316.141.682.00E-164498
c31599_g1_i1IABP01003528E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD3 Exaiptasia pallida KXJ16705.156.160959
c41722_g1_i2IABP01005816Thioredoxin domain-containing protein 11 Exaiptasia pallida KXJ26582.132.172.00E-113385
c48657_g1_i1IABP01009691PREDICTED: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR5-like isoform X8 Parasteatoda tepidariorum XP_015929469.142.20908
c52917_g1_i2IABP01016181PREDICTED: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF213 Callorhinchus milii XP_007886854.135.6201979
c61162_g1_i1IABP01017641Cryptochrome-1 Exaiptasia pallida KXJ26519.145.790932
Selected candidate genes for ecological divergence of Heliopora species Interestingly, dopamine receptor 2-like gene was also found among the fixed SNPs gene list, which has been linked to the season an animal breeds [50]. The timing of reproduction is different between HC-A and HC-B [37, 50]. For example, in both the Philippines [51] and Japan (Taninaka et al. under review), HC-A broods their larvae about 1 month earlier than HC-B even in sympatric sites, indicating that reproductive timing of Heliopora spp. appears to be genetically controlled rather than environmentally-dictated. It is reported that dopamine is related to the spawning timing of Acropora tenuis [52]. In addition, it is suggested that cryptochrome-1 is involved in reproductive timing of acroporid coral [53]. Thus, it is possible that these fixed genetic differences in the dopamine receptor and cryptochrome-1 might contribute to the difference of reproductive patterns in Heliopora spp. and highlight the need for additional research.

Conclusions

We detected clear divergence between Heliopora species based on SNPs obtained from the ezRAD approach utilizing coral host transcriptome data. These data indicate that even among sympatric populations, HC-A and HC-B are reciprocally non-interbreeding, and therefore warrant formal recognition as valid taxonomic species. We also highlight candidate genes which may explain ecological differences between HC-A and HC-B, especially those found in the sympatric populations, which provide mechanistic hypotheses for the divergence of these groups and suggest likely differences in stress response and resilience to future climate conditions. More detailed descriptions of ecological characteristics such as reproduction and stress tolerances between HC-A and HC-B, guided by hypotheses based on fixed SNP differences discovered in this study, will contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanistic and genetic basis of the ecological divergence of blue corals and the speciation process. Additional file 1. R script for analyzing SNPs data. Additional file 2. Venn diagram showing the numbers of loci in which populations share the same allele compositions. Additional file 3: Table S1. Candidate genes for ecological divergence of Heliopora species.
  35 in total

1.  The evolutionary history of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) based on a mitochondrial and a nuclear marker: reticulation, incomplete lineage sorting, or morphological convergence?

Authors:  M J van Oppen; B J McDonald; B Willis; D J Miller
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Development of a coral cDNA array to examine gene expression profiles in Montastraea faveolata exposed to environmental stress.

Authors:  Sara E Edge; Michael B Morgan; Daniel F Gleason; Terry W Snell
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 3.  Molecular phylogenetic insights into the evolution of Octocorallia: a review.

Authors:  Catherine S McFadden; Juan A Sánchez; Scott C France
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Multilocus adaptation associated with heat resistance in reef-building corals.

Authors:  Rachael A Bay; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Species boundaries in the absence of morphological, ecological or geographical differentiation in the Red Sea octocoral genus Ovabunda (Alcyonacea: Xeniidae).

Authors:  Catherine S McFadden; Roxanne Haverkort-Yeh; Alexandra M Reynolds; Anna Halàsz; Andrea M Quattrini; Zac H Forsman; Yehuda Benayahu; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 6.  Molecular delineation of species in the coral holobiont.

Authors:  Michael Stat; Andrew C Baker; David G Bourne; Adrienne M S Correa; Zac Forsman; Megan J Huggett; Xavier Pochon; Derek Skillings; Robert J Toonen; Madeleine J H van Oppen; Ruth D Gates
Journal:  Adv Mar Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.143

7.  Stacks: building and genotyping Loci de novo from short-read sequences.

Authors:  Julian M Catchen; Angel Amores; Paul Hohenlohe; William Cresko; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Early transcriptional changes in the reef-building coral Acropora aspera in response to thermal and nutrient stress.

Authors:  Nedeljka Rosic; Paulina Kaniewska; Chon-Kit Kenneth Chan; Edmund Yew Siang Ling; David Edwards; Sophie Dove; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Does dopamine block the spawning of the acroporid coral Acropora tenuis?

Authors:  N Isomura; C Yamauchi; Y Takeuchi; A Takemura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  No variation and low synonymous substitution rates in coral mtDNA despite high nuclear variation.

Authors:  Michael E Hellberg
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  2 in total

1.  Population genomics for symbiotic anthozoans: can reduced representation approaches be used for taxa without reference genomes?

Authors:  Benjamin M Titus; Marymegan Daly
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.832

2.  Climatic change drives dynamic source-sink relationships in marine species with high dispersal potential.

Authors:  Catarina N S Silva; Emma F Young; Nicholas P Murphy; James J Bell; Bridget S Green; Simon A Morley; Guy Duhamel; Andrew C Cockcroft; Jan M Strugnell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.