| Literature DB >> 31614799 |
Valentina Federici1, Maria Goffredo2, Giuseppe Mancini3, Michela Quaglia4, Adriana Santilli5, Francesca Di Nicola6, Matteo De Ascentis7, Pierangela Cabras8, Carmela Volpicelli9, Claudio De Liberato10, Giuseppe Satta11, Giovanni Federico12, Alessandra Leone13, Maura Pisciella14, Ottavio Portanti15, Federica Pizzurro16, Liana Teodori17, Giovanni Savini18.
Abstract
The distribution of Bluetongue virus (BTV) in Europe can be represented by two distinct and interconnected epidemiological systems (episystems), each characterized by different ecological characteristics and vector species. This study investigated the vector competence of Italian populations of Culicoides imicola and Culicoides obsoletus/scoticus to some representative BTV strains after artificial oral infection. The BTV strains were selected according to their ability to spread to one or both episystems and included BTV-4 ITA, responsible of the recent Italian and French BTV-4 outbreaks; the BTV-2 strain which caused the first BTV incursion in Italy, Corsica, and Balearic Islands; BTV-4 MOR, responsible for the epidemic in Morocco; and BTV-8, the strain which spread through Europe between 2006 and 2008. Blood-soaked cotton pledgets and Hemotek membrane feeder using Parafilm® membrane were used to artificially feed midges. For each population/strain, recovery rates (positive/tested heads) were evaluated using serogroup- and serotype-specific RT-PCR. The trial demonstrated that, except for the Abruzzo population of C. obsoletus/C. scoticus, which was refractory to BTV-4 MOR infection, all the investigated Culicoides populations are susceptible to the selected BTV strains and that, if prompt vaccination programs and restriction measures had not been implemented, BTV-2 and BTV-4 MOR could have spread all over Europe.Entities:
Keywords: Culicoides imicola; Culicoides obsoletus; Culicoides scoticus; Italy; bluetongue virus; oral infection; recovery rate; vector competence
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31614799 PMCID: PMC6832517 DOI: 10.3390/v11100941
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Location of the Italian population of Culicoides obsoletus/scoticus (Abruzzo and Lazio regions) and Culicoides imicola (Sardinia and Calabria regions).
Feeding rate and number of surviving midges at 10 days post-infection (dpi) according to strain, feeding method, and population.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abruzzo | 5 | 9139 | 0.05 |
| 566 | 3923 | 14.43 |
|
|
| Lazio | 229 | 752 | 30.45 |
| ||||
|
| Sardinia | 1107 | 54,471 | 2.03 |
| 330 | 2078 | 15.88 |
|
|
| Calabria | 0 | 2586 | 0 |
| 400 | 2196 | 18.21 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abruzzo | 4 | 4131 | 0.1 |
| 447 | 4589 | 9.74 |
|
|
| Lazio | 173 | 516 | 33.53 |
| ||||
|
| Sardinia | 719 | 71,843 | 1 |
| 351 | 3376 | 10.40 |
|
|
| Calabria | 0 | 1213 | 0 |
| 337 | 2426 | 13.89 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abruzzo | 174 | 484 | 35.95 |
| ||||
|
| Lazio | 77 | 185 | 41.62 |
| ||||
|
| Sardinia | 190 | 57,318 | 0.33 |
| 153 | 1593 | 9.6 |
|
|
| Calabria | 165 | 402 | 41.04 |
| ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abruzzo | 168 | 720 | 23.33 |
| ||||
|
| Lazio | 87 | 278 | 31.29 |
| ||||
|
| Sardinia | 178 | 26,863 | 0.66 |
| ||||
|
| Calabria | 153 | 471 | 32.48 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Titers of bluetongue virus (BTV) strains in blood meals.
| Virus | Minimum–Maximum Virus Titer TCID50 mL (Number of Blood Meals) |
|---|---|
| BTV-4 ITA | 105.3–106.54 (20) |
| BTV-2 | 105.01–106.14 (22) |
| BTV-8 | 105–106.3 (16) |
| BTV-4 MOR | 105.68–106.39 (15) |
Virus detection in Culicoides tested immediately after feeding on BTV-infected blood at 0 days post-infection.
| Serogroup-Specific RT PCR (Positive Midges Ct < 50) | Serotype-Specific RT PCR (Positive Midges Ct < 40) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feeding Method | BTV Strain | Population | Number of Tested | Number of Positive | Recovery Rate (%) | Ct Mean (Min–Max) | Number of Positive | Recovery Rate (%) | Ct Mean (Min–Max) |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 16 | 14 |
| 36 (31–44) | / |
| / | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 11 | 11 |
| 38 (36–39) | 11 |
| 33 (32–35) | |
| Hemotek | 4 ITA | 35 | 33 |
| 37 (35–42) | 33 |
| 33 (30–36) | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 10 | 8 |
| 40 (38–42) | 8 |
| 35 (33–37) | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 15 | 15 |
| 39 (36–42) | 15 |
| 33 (31–36) | |
| cotton | 2 | 15 | 12 |
| 37 (33–42) | 1 |
| 39 (39–39) | |
| cotton | 2 | 11 | 11 |
| 38 (36–39) | 11 |
| 34 (33–35) | |
| Hemotek | 2 | 21 | 19 |
| 39 (36–43) | 18 |
| 34 (32–39) | |
| cotton | 2 | 14 | 7 |
| 43 (41–44) | 4 |
| 38 (36–39) | |
| cotton | 2 | 12 | 12 |
| 40 (35–43) | 12 |
| 35 (32–38) | |
| cotton | 8 | 17 | 12 |
| 42 (39–47) | 7 |
| 35 (34–36) | |
| cotton | 8 | 7 | 4 |
| 41 (39–42) | 2 |
| 36 (34–37) | |
| Hemotek | 8 | 9 | / |
| / | 8 |
| 35 (32–37) | |
| cotton | 8 | 13 | / |
| / | 9 |
| 36 (35–37) | |
| cotton | 8 | 15 | 13 |
| 39 (37–41) | 13 |
| 35 (33–37) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 13 | 10 |
| 42 (38–49) | 10 |
| 35 (33–38) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 8 | 7 |
| 40 (37–47) | 7 |
| 33 (31–35) | |
| Hemotek | 4 MOR | 6 | 6 |
| 36 (34–38) | 6 |
| 31 (29–32) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 14 | 14 |
| 39 (36–41) | 13 |
| 34 (31–37) | |
Virus detection in Culicoides (heads) fed on BTV-infected blood at 10 days post-infection.
| Serogroup-Specific RT PCR (Positive Midges Ct < 50) | Serotype-Specific RT PCR (Positive Midges Ct < 40) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feeding Method | BTV Strain | Population | Number of Tested | Number of Positive | Ct Mean (Min–Max) | Number of Positive | Ct Mean (Min–Max) |
| Hemotek | 4 ITA | 4 | 0 | / | / | / | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 190 | 9 | 40 (34–46) | 1 | 29 (29–29) | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 186 | 18 | 41 (25–47) | 2 | 33 (27–39) | |
| Hemotek | 4 ITA | 359 | 275 | 32 (24–48) | 253 | 30 (23–39) | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 258 | 17 | 36 (27–41) | 9 | 33 (27–38) | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 269 | 15 | 40 (26–47) | 6 | 33 (24–37) | |
| Hemotek | 2 | 1 | 0 | / | / | / | |
| cotton | 2 | 226 | 6 | 38 (27–42) | 1 | 30 (30–30) | |
| cotton | 2 | 75 | 9 | 38 (33–40) | 2 | 36 (33–38) | |
| Hemotek | 2 | 257 | 186 | 32 (22–47) | 171 | 29 (23–39) | |
| cotton | 2 | 228 | 16 | 40 (32–45) | 12 | 35 (30–39) | |
| cotton | 2 | 219 | 7 | 41 (28–45) | 2 | 32 (25–38) | |
| cotton | 8 | 110 | 4 | 43 (39–46) | 1 | 38 (38–38) | |
| cotton | 8 | 61 | 2 | 42 (39–44) | 0 | / | |
| Hemotek | 8 | 107 | / | / | 56 | 30 (27–38) | |
| cotton | 8 | 125 | / | / | 1 | 30 (30–30) | |
| cotton | 8 | 117 | 12 | 40 (31–44) | 1 | 34 (34–34) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 126 | 0 | / | / | / | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 64 | 4 | 40 (38–43) | 0 | / | |
| Hemotek | 4 MOR | 120 | 62 | 38 (31–45) | 59 | 32 (27–38) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 116 | 8 | 38 (33–43) | 6 | 32 (29–39) | |
Figure 2Recovery rate of bluetongue virus strains from Culicoides imicola (Sardinia population) fed through different methods: Hemotek device (H), cotton wool pledgets (C).
Recovery rates of bluetongue virus strains from different Italian vector populations orally infected according to different RT-PCR cut-off levels.
| Serogroup-Specific RT-PCR | Serotype-Specific RT-PCR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feeding Method | BTV Strain | Population | Number of Tested | Number of Positive with Ct < 50 (Recovery Rate%) | Number of Positive with Ct < Mean Ct at 0 dpi (Recovery Rate%) | Number of Positive with Ct < 40 (Recovery Rate%) | Number of Positive with Ct < Mean Ct at 0 dpi (Recovery Rate%) |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 190 | 9 (4.7) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | / | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 186 | 18 (9.7) | 2 (1.1) | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Hemotek | 4 ITA | 359 | 275 (76.6) | 201 (56) | 253 (70.5) | 165 (46) | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 258 | 17 (6.6) | 13 (5) | 9 (3.5) | 6 (2.3) | |
| cotton | 4 ITA | 269 | 15 (5.6) | 4 (1.5) | 6 (2.2) | 1 (0.4) | |
| cotton | 2 | 226 | 6 (2.7) | 2 (0.9) | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) | |
| cotton | 2 | 75 | 9 (12.0) | 2 (2.7) | 2 (2.7) | 1 (1.3) | |
| Hemotek | 2 | 257 | 186 (72.4) | 148 (57.6) | 171 (66.5) | 131 (51.4) | |
| cotton | 2 | 228 | 16 (7.0) | 11 (4.8) | 12 (5.3) | 10 (4.4) | |
| cotton | 2 | 219 | 7 (3.2) | 2 (0.9) | 2 (0.9) | 1 (0.5) | |
| cotton | 8 | 110 | 4 (3.6) | 2 (1.8) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | |
| cotton | 8 | 61 | 2 (3.3) | 1 (1.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Hemotek | 8 | 107 | / | / | 56 (52.3) | 54 (50.5) | |
| cotton | 8 | 125 | / | / | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.8) | |
| cotton | 8 | 117 | 12 (10.3) | 2 (1.7) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 126 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 64 | 4 (6.3) | 2 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Hemotek | 4 MOR | 120 | 62 (51.7) | 16 (13.3) | 59 (49.2) | 21 (17.5) | |
| cotton | 4 MOR | 116 | 8 (6.9) | 5 (4.3) | 6 (5.2) | 4 (3.4) | |
Comparison of the recovery rates (serogroup-specific/serotype-specific RT-PCR positive heads/tested heads at 10 days post-infection) from different Italian vector populations, orally infected with BTV strains.
| Recovery Rate % (Confidence Intervals %) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT-PCR | Population | Feeding Method | BTV-4 ITA | BTV-2 | BTV-8 | BTV-4 MOR |
| Serogroup-specific RT-PCR | Cotton | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0 | |
| Cotton | 1.1 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 3.1 | ||
| Hemotek | 56 | 57.6 | / | 13.3 | ||
| Cotton | 5 | 4.8 | / | / | ||
| Cotton | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 4.3 | ||
| Serotype-specific RT-PCR | Cotton | / | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cotton | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Hemotek | 46 | 51.4 | 50.5 | 17.5 | ||
| Cotton | 2.3 | 4.4 | 0.8 | / | ||
| Cotton | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 3.4 | ||
Recovery rate (serogroup-specific RT-PCR) and relative 95% confidence interval of Culicoides obsoletus and C. scoticus fed on BTV-infected blood at 0 and 10 days post-infection.
| Dpi | BTV Strain | Site | Species | Number of Positive/Number of Tested | Recovery Rate % | Confidence Intervals % | CT Mean (Min–Max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4 ITA | Abruzzo |
| 5/6 | 83.3 | / | 37 (32–44) |
|
| 8/9 | 88.9 | / | 34 (31–40) | |||
| 1/1 | 100 | / | 41 (41–41) | ||||
| Lazio |
| 1/1 | 100 | / | 37 (37–37) | ||
|
| 10/10 | 100 | / | 38 (36–39) | |||
| 2 | Abruzzo |
| 2/2 | 100 | / | 38 (33–42) | |
|
| 10/12 | 83.3 | / | 37 (33–42) | |||
| Lazio |
| 2/2 | 100 | / | 38 (36–39) | ||
|
| 9/9 | 100 | / | 38 (36–39) | |||
| 8 | Abruzzo |
| 6/8 | 75 | / | 42 (39–45) | |
|
| 4/7 | 57.1 | / | 42 (39–47) | |||
| 2/2 | 100 | / | 41 (40–42) | ||||
| Lazio |
| 6/6 | 100 | / | 41 (41–42) | ||
|
| 1/1 | 100 | / | 39 (39–39) | |||
| 4 MOR | Abruzzo |
| 3/5 | 60 | / | 43 (40–48) | |
|
| 7/8 | 87.5 | / | 42 (38–49) | |||
| Lazio |
| 3/4 | 75 | / | 39 (38–41) | ||
|
| 4/4 | 100 | / | 40 (37–47) | |||
|
| 4 ITA | Abruzzo |
| 1/14 | 7.1 | 1.7–31.9 | 34 (34–34) |
|
| 8/173 | 4.6 | 2.4–8.9 | 41 (37–46) | |||
| 0/3 | 0 | / | / | ||||
| Lazio |
| 3/39 | 7.7 | 2.8–20.4 | 41 (38–43) | ||
|
| 15/146 | 10.3 | 6.4–16.3 | 40 (25–47) | |||
| 0/1 | 0 | / | / | ||||
| 2 | Abruzzo |
| 0/46 | 0 | 0.1–7.5 | / | |
|
| 6/178 | 3.4 | 1.6–7.2 | 38 (27–42) | |||
| 0/2 | 0 | / | / | ||||
| Lazio |
| 2/16 | 12.5 | 3.8–36.4 | 36 (33–39) | ||
|
| 7/59 | 11.9 | 5.9–22.6 | 39 (37–40) | |||
| 8 | Abruzzo |
| 1/45 | 2.2 | 0.5–11.5 | 44 (44–44) | |
|
| 3/63 | 4.8 | 1.7–13.1 | 42 (39–46) | |||
| 0/2 | 0 | / | / | ||||
| Lazio |
| 2/46 | 4.3 | 1.3–14.5 | 42 (39–44) | ||
|
| 0/15 | 0 | 0.2–20.6 | / | |||
| 4 MOR | Abruzzo |
| 0/22 | 0 | 0.1–14.8 | / | |
|
| 0/103 | 0 | 0–3.5 | / | |||
| 0/1 | 0 | / | / | ||||
| Lazio |
| 2/28 | 7.1 | 2.2–22.8 | 41 (38–43) | ||
|
| 2/36 | 5.6 | 0.1–9.5 | 40 (39–41) |
* species identification inconclusive.