| Literature DB >> 31614601 |
Yilong Zhang1,2,3, Yan Zheng4,5,6, Wen Shi7,8,9, Yahui Guo10,11, Tao Xu12,13,14, Zeng Li15,16,17, Cheng Huang18,19,20, Jun Li21,22,23.
Abstract
To develop new anti-inflammatory agents, a series of 7-O-amide hesperetin derivatives was designed, synthesized and evaluated for anti-inflammatory activity using RAW264.7 cells. All compounds showed inhibitory effect on LPS-induced NO production. Among them, 7-O-(2-(Propylamino)-2-oxoethyl)hesperetin (4d) and 7-O-(2-(Cyclopentylamino)-2-oxoethyl)hesperetin (4k) with hydrophobic side chains exhibited the most potent NO inhibitory activity (IC50 = 19.32 and 16.63 μM, respectively), showing stronger inhibitory effect on the production of pro- inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) than indomethacin and celecoxib at 10 μM. The structure-activity relationships (SARs) suggested that the 7-O-amide unit was buried in a medium-sized hydrophobic cavity of the bound receptor. Furthermore, compound 4d could also significantly suppress the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase enzymes (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), through the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway.Entities:
Keywords: NF-κB; hesperetin derivatives; inflammatory; structure-activity relationships.; synthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31614601 PMCID: PMC6832651 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24203663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of hesperetin derivatives and conditions: (A) 96% H2SO4, EtOH, 80 °C, reflux; (B) DMF, K2CO3, Ethyl bromoacetate, r.t; (C) 10% NaOH, H2O, 0 °C; 10% HCl, ice bath; (D) EDC·HCl, HOBT, CHCl3, Amines (4a–l: Linear alkylamine, branched alkylamine and cycloalkylamine; 5a–b: Five-membered heterocyclic amine; 6a–f: Six-membered heterocyclic amine; 7a–c: Amine with terminal hydrophilic group), r.t.
1H-NMR data of the compounds’ OH groups (δ in ppm).
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Hesperidin | 12.03 | 9.10 | |
| Hesperetin | 12.14 | 10.80 | 9.11 |
| Compound | 12.08 | 9.13 | |
Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells at a compound concentration of 40 μM.
| Compound | %Cell Viability in 40 μM |
|---|---|
|
| 0.86 ± 0.07 ns |
|
| 1.00 |
|
| 0.8 ± 0.01 ns |
|
| 0.93 ± 0.02 ns |
|
| 0.89 ± 0.04 ns |
|
| 0.91 ± 0.04 ns |
|
| 1 ± 0.08 ns |
|
| 0.93 ± 0.01 ns |
|
| 0.93 ± 0.01 ns |
|
| 1 ± 0.03 ns |
|
| 0.87 ± 0.01 ns |
|
| 0.88 ± 0.03 ns |
|
| 0.96 ± 0.14 ns |
|
| 1.07 ± 0.01 ns |
|
| 0.77 ± 0.01 ns |
|
| 0.88 ± 0.03 ns |
|
| 1.03 ± 0.02 ns |
|
| 1.01 ± 0.11 ns |
|
| 0.97 ± 0.36 ns |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.01 ns |
|
| 1.08 ± 0.11 ns |
|
| 1.17 ± 0.09 ns |
|
| 1 ± 0.03 ns |
|
| 1.07 ± 0.09 ns |
|
| 0.85 ± 0.02 ns |
Cell viabilities of hesperetin derivatives on RAW264.7 cells. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). The difference was considered without statistically significance (ns) compared with DMSO + LPS group.
Figure 1The viability assay of RAW264.7 cells was determined by MTT assay on different concentrations of compound 4d. Compared with the LPS group and the control group. The results are presented as the means ± SD of three different experiments. The difference was considered without statistically significance (ns).
IC50 and Inhibition rate on NO production in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells at the compound concentration of 10 μM.
| Compound | NO Inhibition in 10 μM(%) | IC50 (μM) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 12.87 ± 3.09 *** | 35.30 ± 8.07 |
|
| 14.48 ± 3.61 **** | 26.35 ± 0.46 |
|
| 16.00 ± 0.06 **** | 38.53 ± 2.00 |
|
| 21.49 ± 1.29 **** | 29.94 ± 3.40 |
|
| 13.52 ± 1.63 **** | 32.46 ± 2.46 |
|
| 38.17 ± 1.13 **** | 19.32 ± 0.47 |
|
| 27.15 ±5.88 **** | 26.13 ± 1.21 |
|
| 17.99±0.82 **** | 29.71 ± 3.06 |
|
| 23.51 ± 0.74 **** | 24.59 ± 0.22 |
|
| 17.49 ± 1.33 **** | 42.02 ± 6.15 |
|
| 17.48 ± 2.33 **** | 30.48 ± 1.66 |
|
| 9.57 ± 5.53 * | 41.70 ± 2.79 |
|
| 40.85 ± 0.64 **** | 16.63 ± 0.85 |
|
| 20.34 ± 2.00 **** | 33.30 ± 3.30 |
|
| 18.92 ± 4.02 **** | 36.22 ± 5.83 |
|
| 22.74 ± 5.71 **** | 30.03 ± 0.43 |
|
| 30.20 ± 4.67 **** | 23.40 ± 1.64 |
|
| 19.33 ± 1.94 **** | 31.12 ± 2.93 |
|
| 9.10 ± 3.67 * | 40.55 ± 5.56 |
|
| 22.20 ± 6.24 **** | 33.82 ± 5.56 |
|
| 22.95 ± 2.74 **** | 32.28 ± 3.57 |
|
| 20.96 ± 0.31 **** | 32.62 ± 1.514 |
|
| 15.03 ± 1.99 **** | 28.43 ± 5.33 |
|
| 12.37 ± 0.67 *** | 92.51 ± 33.74 |
|
| 18.38 ± 4.55 **** | 42.38 ± 2.06 |
After pretreatment with the compounds for 1 h, RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). The difference was considered statistically significant when p (*) < 0.05, p (***) < 0.001, p (****) < 0.0001.
Figure 2Initial evaluation releases of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in RAW264.7 cells. TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in the culture medium were measured by ELISA. (A–C) Cells were treated with 10 μM compounds. (D–F) Cells were pretreated with different concentrations of compound 4d. The levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in the medium were determined with the ELISA kit. Indomethacin (Ind) and celecoxib (Cel) were used as a positive control drug. The results were presented as the means ± SD of three different experiments. The difference was considered statistically significant when p (*) < 0.05, p (**) < 0.01, p (***) < 0.001, p (****) < 0.0001 compared with LPS-stimulated group.
Figure 3Compound 4d inhibited expression levels of COX-2 and iNOS in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. The results were presented as the means ± SD of three different experiments. The difference was considered statistically significant when p (*) < 0.05, p (***) < 0.001, p (****) < 0.0001.
Figure 4Compound 4d negatively regulated NF-κB signal pathway in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. The results were presented as the means ± SD of three different experiments. The difference was considered statistically significant when p (*) < 0.05, p (***) < 0.001, p (****) < 0.0001 or no significance (ns) compared with LPS-stimulated group.