Introduction: Access to dermatologic care is a major issue in the United States, especially within the un- and underinsured populations; technology, including teledermatology, will pay a role in improving access to care. Methods: We performed a prospective study between November 2016 and September 2017. We leveraged a partnership between Mayo Clinic and Mountain Park Health Clinic, a community clinic that primarily serves un- and underinsured populations. We implemented a mobile phone-based store and forward (SAF) teledermatology service, which integrated an external community health clinic to an existing electronic health record (EHR) using standardized data capture forms, real-time support, and simple workflows. Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study, 65% female and 35% male with an average age of 47.9 (SD = 15.9). The ethnic breakdown was: 81.1% Hispanic, 13.5% Caucasian, and 5.4% African American. The majority, 62.2%, did not have a high school education, 45.9% were unemployed, and 51.4% were uninsured. 64.9% earned less than $25,000 for annual household income. Teledermatology consultation increased the absolute diagnostic and management concordance by 36.6% (p = 0.01, 95% CI 12.2%-61.0%) and 34.2% (p < 0.01, 95% CI 11%-57%), respectively. Primary care providers had a significant increase in mean confidence in the diagnosis and management of dermatology conditions pre and poststudy (3.60 vs. 3.70 and 3.21 vs. 3.60, respectively; p < 0.01). Ninety-six percent of the primary care providers agreed (52.0%) and strongly agreed (44.0%) that they would send another patient for teleconsultation. Conclusion: We successfully implemented a SAF teledermatology consultative service in a community health clinic outside our EHR. A similar approach can be used by other large health care organizations to provide integrated, high-quality consultation to clinics with rural, un- and underinsured populations.
Introduction: Access to dermatologic care is a major issue in the United States, especially within the un- and underinsured populations; technology, including teledermatology, will pay a role in improving access to care. Methods: We performed a prospective study between November 2016 and September 2017. We leveraged a partnership between Mayo Clinic and Mountain Park Health Clinic, a community clinic that primarily serves un- and underinsured populations. We implemented a mobile phone-based store and forward (SAF) teledermatology service, which integrated an external community health clinic to an existing electronic health record (EHR) using standardized data capture forms, real-time support, and simple workflows. Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study, 65% female and 35% male with an average age of 47.9 (SD = 15.9). The ethnic breakdown was: 81.1% Hispanic, 13.5% Caucasian, and 5.4% African American. The majority, 62.2%, did not have a high school education, 45.9% were unemployed, and 51.4% were uninsured. 64.9% earned less than $25,000 for annual household income. Teledermatology consultation increased the absolute diagnostic and management concordance by 36.6% (p = 0.01, 95% CI 12.2%-61.0%) and 34.2% (p < 0.01, 95% CI 11%-57%), respectively. Primary care providers had a significant increase in mean confidence in the diagnosis and management of dermatology conditions pre and poststudy (3.60 vs. 3.70 and 3.21 vs. 3.60, respectively; p < 0.01). Ninety-six percent of the primary care providers agreed (52.0%) and strongly agreed (44.0%) that they would send another patient for teleconsultation. Conclusion: We successfully implemented a SAF teledermatology consultative service in a community health clinic outside our EHR. A similar approach can be used by other large health care organizations to provide integrated, high-quality consultation to clinics with rural, un- and underinsured populations.
Authors: Helen J L Cumsky; Connor J Maly; Collin M Costello; Matthew R Buras; LeeAnn M Ranieri; Michael L Grover; Nneka I Comfere; Steven A Nelson; Mark R Pittelkow; Aaron R Mangold Journal: Int J Dermatol Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 2.736
Authors: Zachary A Carter; Shauna Goldman; Kristen Anderson; Xiaxiao Li; Linda S Hynan; Benjamin F Chong; Arturo R Dominguez Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: M A Loane; S E Bloomer; R Corbett; D J Eedy; N Hicks; H E Lotery; C Mathews; J Paisley; K Steele; R Wootton Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: April W Armstrong; Mei W Kwong; Elizabeth P Chase; Lynda Ledo; Thomas S Nesbitt; Sandra Louise Shewry Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Caroline A Nelson; Junko Takeshita; Karolyn A Wanat; Kent D W Bream; John H Holmes; Helen C Koenig; Rudolf R Roth; Anitha Vuppalapati; William D James; Carrie L Kovarik Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: John D Whited; Santanu Datta; Russell P Hall; Marjorie E Foy; Laurie E Marbrey; Steven C Grambow; Tara K Dudley; David L Simel; Eugene Z Oddone Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2003 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Francesc X Marin-Gomez; Josep Vidal-Alaball; Pere Roura Poch; Carles Janes Sariola; Rosa Taberner Ferrer; Jacobo Mendioroz Peña Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2020 Jan-Dec