Literature DB >> 18723242

The US dermatology workforce: a specialty remains in shortage.

Alexa Boer Kimball1, Jack S Resneck.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Since 1999, multiple surveys have documented a stable undersupply of dermatologic services in the United States. Factors contributing to the imbalance include changes in the demographics of the physician workforce, increased demand for services, and a limited number of training positions for new physicians. In response to the demand, there has also been a substantial influx of nonphysician clinicians into dermatology offices.
METHODS: We sought to follow up the large data set collected by the American Academy of Dermatology in 2002; the survey was repeated in 2005 and 2007. Response rates ranged from 30% to 35% and included more than 1200 respondents each year.
RESULTS: Few changes were noted in the metrics used to assess the balance of supply and demand in the US dermatology workforce between 2002 and 2007. Mean wait times for new patient appointments decreased slightly from 36 to 33 days. One third of practices continue to seek additional dermatologists. In 2007, 23% of practices reported employing a physician assistant and 10% a nurse practitioner (up from 15% and 8% in 2002). In 2007, typical dermatologists continued to spend the bulk of their direct patient care time in medical dermatology (23.9 hours, 63%), followed by surgery (10.2 hours, 27%), and then cosmetic dermatology (3.8 hours, 10%). A substantial subset of dermatologists (29%) spent half or more of their time in surgical and cosmetic dermatology combined. Although female dermatologists worked fewer total hours, they spent equal time caring for patients with medical dermatologic conditions, less time in surgical dermatology, and more time in cosmetic dermatology. LIMITATIONS: The survey is potentially subject to inaccurate self-report and response bias. Although the results shed light on patient access and the dermatology workforce, they do not establish or quantify any impact on patients' health.
CONCLUSIONS: Between 2002 and 2007, despite continued increases in the number of nonphysician clinicians in US dermatology offices, there were only small changes in the overall metrics commonly used to assess workforce balance. These findings suggest persistent unmet demand, but, given divergent trends of ongoing increases in surgical and cosmetic dermatology, growth in the use of physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and an aging and expanding US population, the future balance of supply and demand remains difficult to predict. Nevertheless, careful workforce planning and deliberative consideration of the risks and benefits of rapidly emerging changes in the delivery of dermatologic care are essential to ensure access to high-quality care for patients with skin disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18723242     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  40 in total

1.  Improving Access to Care Through the Establishment of a Local, Teledermatology Network.

Authors:  Collin M Costello; Helen J L Cumsky; Connor J Maly; Jamison A Harvey; Matthew R Buras; Peter J Pallagi; Anna L Gustaveson; Davinder P Singh; Steven A Nelson; Mark R Pittelkow; Aaron R Mangold
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  The influence of dermatologist and primary care physician visits on melanoma outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jeanne M Ferrante; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Ren Chen; Kate J Fisher; Kymia Love-Jackson; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Association of Dermatologist Density With the Volume and Costs of Dermatology Procedures Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Sally Y Tan; Daphne Tsoucas; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  The Dermatology workforce in Saudi Arabia: Current trends, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Ghada A Bin Saif; Mohammed Al-Haddab
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2010-11

5.  A Clinical Aid for Detecting Skin Cancer: The Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA).

Authors:  T Rogers; M L Marino; S W Dusza; S Bajaj; R P Usatine; M A Marchetti; A A Marghoob
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Analysis of Trends in Geographic Distribution of US Dermatology Workforce Density.

Authors:  Alex M Glazer; Darrell S Rigel
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 7.  The digital age of melanoma management: detection and diagnostics.

Authors:  Alexander L Fogel; Kavita Sarin
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-11-26

8.  Comparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Juliana Berk-Krauss; Paula W Feng; Jennifer A Stein
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

9.  Nonphysician Practice of Cosmetic Dermatology: A Patient and Physician Perspective of Outcomes and Adverse Events.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Britney Wilson; Brian P Hibler; Lynn A Drake
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.398

10.  Design and characterization of a novel multimodal fiber-optic probe and spectroscopy system for skin cancer applications.

Authors:  Manu Sharma; Eric Marple; Jason Reichenberg; James W Tunnell
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.