| Literature DB >> 31612122 |
Giulio Pulvirenti1, Giuseppe Fabio Parisi1, Alessandro Giallongo1, Maria Papale1, Sara Manti1,2, Salvatore Savasta3, Amelia Licari3, Gian Luigi Marseglia3, Salvatore Leonardi1.
Abstract
During the last several years, the interest in the role of microbiota in human health has grown significantly. For many years, the lung was considered a sterile environment, and only recently, with the use of more sophisticated techniques, has it been demonstrated that colonization by a complex population of microorganisms in lower airways also occurs in healthy subjects; a predominance of some species of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes phyla and with a peculiar composition in some disease conditions, such as asthma, have been noted. Lung microbiota derives mainly from the higher airways microbiota. Although we have some information about the role of gut microbiota in modulation of immune system, less it is known about the connection between lung microbiota and local and systemic immunity. There is a correlation between altered microbiota composition and some diseases or chronic states; however, despite this correlation, it has not been clearly demonstrated whether the lung microbiota dysbiosis could be a consequence or a cause of these diseases. We are far from a scientific approach to the therapeutic use of probiotics in airway diseases, but we are only at the starting point of a knowledge process in this fascinating field that could reveal important surprises, and randomized prospective studies in future could reveal more about the clinical possibilities for controlling lung microbiota. This review was aimed at updating the current knowledge in the field of airway microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: airway; asthma; immunity; infections; lung; microbiome; microbiota; probiotics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31612122 PMCID: PMC6776601 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Figure 1Association of microbiota dysbiosis in patients with asthma.
Main associations of microbiota in asthma.
| Case-control ( | 39 asthmatic patients and 19 control subjects | 16S rRNA V4 amplicon sequencing | Endobronchial brushings and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid | Limited number of subjects | |
| Case-control ( | 10 non-asthmatic subjects and 10 patients with mild active asthma | DNA extracted from sputum supernatants and amplified by using primers specific for the V6 hypervariable region of bacterial 16S rRNA | Induced sputum | Proteobacteria in asthmatic patients | Limited number of subjects |
| Case-control ( | 65 patients with suboptimally controlled asthma and 10 healthy control subjects | High-density 16S ribosomal RNA microarray and parallel clone library-sequencing analysis | Bronchial epithelial brushings | 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon concentrations and bacterial diversity were significantly higher among asthmatic patients. Airway microbiota composition and diversity were significantly correlated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness | Pilot study |
| Case-control ( | 42 atopic asthmatic subjects, 21 subjects with atopy but no asthma, and 21 healthy control subjects | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | Bronchial brushing | ||
| Cohort study ( | Children developing allergic symptoms and sensitization ( | Illumina sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene | Oral bacterial composition in saliva samples collected at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 7 years of age | Lower diversity of salivary bacteria and highly divergent bacterial composition at 7 years of age in children developing asthma | |
| Cohort study ( | 40 children and adolescents with asthma | Sequence data from the 16S-V4 rRNA gene region | Nasopharyngeal washes | ||
| Prospective cohort study ( | 234 children | 16S rRNA gene deep sequencing | Nasopharygeal samples | Early asymptomatic colonization with | |
| Cohort study ( | 413 Children with enrolled in a trial of omalizumab (anti-IgE) | 16S rRNA profiling | Nasal secretion samples | ||
| Multicenter randomized controlled trial ( | 167 adults | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | Induced sputum specimens | A greater frequency of pathogenic taxa at high relative abundance and reduced |
Probiotic supplementary therapy explored in randomized controlled trials.
| Meta-analysis ( | Four randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving | 1,805 participants | There was no significant difference between the | |
| Double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial ( | Patients randomized to receive | 160 children with asthma aged 6–18 years | The LP + LF group demonstrated increased peak expiratory flow rates and decreased IgE levels | |
| Meta-analysis ( | 17 randomized controlled trials | 5,264 children | Probiotic use do not reduce the asthma risk | Effects were based on the type of probiotics used, which also need more large-sample and high-quality studies |
| Meta-analysis ( | 19 randomized controlled trials | 5,157 children | Probiotic supplementation compared with placebo was not associated with a lower risk of asthma in infant | |
| Systematic review ( | 14 randomized controlled trials | Probiotics in immunocompetent children have a modest effect both in diminishing the incidence of upper respiratory infections and the severity of the infection symptoms | ||
| Meta-analysis ( | 23 randomized trials | 6,269 children | Probiotics significantly decreased the number of subjects having at least 1 respiratory tract infection episode. | |
| Systematic review ( | 11 randomized clinical trials | 2,417 children | Reduction in new episodes of disease was a favorable outcome for the use of probiotics in the treatment of respiratory infections | Studies showed to be heterogeneous regarding strains of probiotics, the mode of administration, the time of use, and outcomes |