| Literature DB >> 31612119 |
Hassan O Eliwan1,2,3,4, William R G Watson4, Irene Regan5, Brian Philbin5, Fiona M O'Hare1,2,4, Tammy Strickland6, Amanda O'Neill4, Michelle O'Rourke5, Alfonso Blanco4, Martina Healy7, Beatrice Nolan5, Owen Smith5, Eleanor J Molloy1,2,3,4,6,8,9.
Abstract
Objective: Sepsis is major cause of morbidity and mortality in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). PICU patients may develop transient immune deficiency during sepsis. Activated Protein C (APC) has significant anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects. Clinical trials of APC in adult sepsis initially showed improved outcome but recent trials showed no benefit in adults or children. We aimed to assess the effects of APC treatment on innate immune responses in children. Design and Subjects: We compared neutrophil and monocyte responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with and without APC treatment in PICU patients at the time of evaluation for sepsis compared with healthy adults and age-matched pediatric controls. We used flow cytometry to examine cell activation (CD11b expression), function [intracellular reactive oxygen intermediate (ROI) release] and LPS recognition [Toll like Receptor 4 (TLR4) expression].Entities:
Keywords: APC; CD11b; LPS; PICU; ROI; Sepsis; TLR4
Year: 2019 PMID: 31612119 PMCID: PMC6776988 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of PICU patients.
| 1 | 12 y | T21, ASD,VSD, Pulmonary stenosis | N | LRTI | Sputum | 4 | |
| 2 | 12 m | T21, AVSD | N | CCF, LRTI | Sputum | 4 | |
| 3 | 12 y | Aspiration pneumonia | N | Respiratory failure | Sputum | 230 | |
| 4 | 12 m | Scimitar syndrome | Y | Seizures, RSV bronchiolitis, LRTI | No growth | NA | 70 |
| 5 | 12 y | Spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis | N | Left pulmonary collapse | No growth | NA | 152 |
| 6 | 30 d | HLHS | N | Cardiac tamponade, coagulopathy | No growth | NA | 20 |
| 7 | 12 m | CDH | Y | PPHN, PDA | Central line | 4 | |
| 8 | 12 y | Pneumonia with pleural effusion | N | Empyema | Sputum | 8 | |
| 9 | 30 d | Aortic stenosis & endocardial fibroelastosis | N | Seizures, RSV brochiolitis | Central line | 103 | |
| 10 | 12 m | Perforated NEC | N | Preterm, grade II IVH | Central line | 40 | |
| 11 | 30 d | Duodenal atresia | Y | IVH | Blood | 67 | |
| 12 | 12 m | TOF | N | Chylothorax | Central line | 4 | |
| 13 | 30 d | Perforated NEC | N | SVT | Central line | 118 | |
| 14 | 30 d | HLHS | Y | Renal Failure | Urine | 32 |
T21, Trisomy 21; ASD, atrial septal defect; VSD, ventricular septal defect; LRTI, lower respiratory tract infection; AVSD, atrial ventricular septal defect; CCF, congestive cardiac failure; RSV, respiratory syncitial virus; HLHS; hypoplastic left heart syndrome; CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; PPHN, persistent pulmonary hypertension; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; PT, preterm; TOF, Tetralogy of Fallot; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia; Ps. aeruginosa, Psedomonas aeruginosa; Coag Neg staph, Coagulase negative staphylococcus; H.influenzae; Haemophilus influenza; Strep. Pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumonia; Kl. oxytoca, Klebsiella oxytoca.
Figure 1Neutrophil and monocyte LPS responses and APC modulation: Whole blood from healthy adult controls (n = 15), pediatric controls (p = 15), and PICU patients (n = 15) was incubated with LPS + APC for 1 h. Then stimulated with DHR and PMA. Results were expressed as the Ln mean channel fluorescence + SEM. (A) Neutrophil ROI: *p < 0.05 vs. pediatric controls and PICU patients; **p < 0.05 vs. adult controls; ***p < 0.05 vs. adult LPS response. (B) Monocyte ROI: *p < 0.05 vs. adults controls.
Figure 2Neutrophil and monocyte CD11b expression: Whole blood from healthy adult controls (n = 15), pediatric controls (p = 15) and PICU patients (n = 15) was incubated with LPS + APC for 1 h. Neutrophils and monocytes were assessed for CD11b expression using a PE-labeled mAb and mean channel fluorescence analyzed using flow cytometry. The neutrophil and monocyte populations were selected based on their scatter profile: forward scatter and side scatter (A) Neutrophil CD11b expression: *p < 0.05 vs. respective controls; **p < 0.05 vs. PICU patients. (B) Monocyte CD11b expression: *p < 0.05 vs. respective controls.
Figure 3Neutrophil and monocyte TLR4 responses and APC modulation: Whole blood from healthy adult controls (n = 15), pediatric controls (p = 15), and PICU patients (n = 15) was incubated with LPS + APC for 1 h. Neutrophils and monocytes were then labeled with Alex Fluor 647 TLR4 mAb and mean channel fluorescence was analyzed using flow cytometry. The neutrophil and monocyte populations were selected via flow cytometry based on their scatter profile: forward scatter and side scatter. (A) Neutrophil TLR4 expression: *p < 0.05 vs. PICU control; **p < 0.05 vs. PICU LPS response; ***p < 0.05 vs. PICU LPS response. (B) Monocyte TLR4 expression: *p < 0.05 vs. PICU controls.
Figure 4Neutrophil and Monocyte ROI and Neutrophil TLR4 expression in survivors and non-survivors in PICU: Whole blood was incubated with LPS ± APC for 1 h and then stimulated with DHR and PMA and evaluated by flow cytometry. Results were expressed as the Ln mean channel fluorescence + SEM. (A) Neutrophil ROI generation: *p < 0.05 vs. survivor controls. (B) Monocyte ROI generation: *p < 0.05 vs. survivor controls. (C) Neutrophil TLR4 expression: Whole blood was incubated with LPS ± APC for 1 h. Neutrophils were labeled with Alex Fluor 647 TLR4mAb and mean channel fluorescence (MCF) analyzed using flow cytometry. *p < 0.05 vs. non-survivor controls.