Literature DB >> 31611644

Type I interferon-driven susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by IL-1Ra.

Daisy X Ji1, Livia H Yamashiro1, Katherine J Chen1, Naofumi Mukaida2, Igor Kramnik3, K Heran Darwin4, Russell E Vance5,6,7.   

Abstract

The bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) causes tuberculosis and is responsible for more human mortality than any other single pathogen1. Progression to active disease occurs in only a fraction of infected individuals and is predicted by an elevated type I interferon (IFN) response2-7. Whether or how IFNs mediate susceptibility to Mtb has been difficult to study due to a lack of suitable mouse models6-11. Here, we examined B6.Sst1S congenic mice that carry the 'susceptible' allele of the Sst1 locus that results in exacerbated Mtb disease12-14. We found that enhanced production of type I IFNs was responsible for the susceptibility of B6.Sst1S mice to Mtb. Type I IFNs affect the expression of hundreds of genes, several of which have previously been implicated in susceptibility to bacterial infections6,7,15-18. Nevertheless, we found that heterozygous deficiency in just a single IFN target gene, Il1rn, which encodes interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), is sufficient to reverse IFN-driven susceptibility to Mtb in B6.Sst1S mice. In addition, antibody-mediated neutralization of IL-1Ra provided therapeutic benefit to Mtb-infected B6.Sst1S mice. Our results illustrate the value of the B6.Sst1S mouse to model IFN-driven susceptibility to Mtb, and demonstrate that IL-1Ra is an important mediator of type I IFN-driven susceptibility to Mtb infections in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31611644      PMCID: PMC6879852          DOI: 10.1038/s41564-019-0578-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Microbiol        ISSN: 2058-5276            Impact factor:   17.745


Mtb infections in humans result in highly diverse outcomes ranging from asymptomatic lung granulomas to lethal disseminated disease. Active TB is characterized by the uncontrolled replication of bacteria and pathological inflammation in the lungs and other organs. There is no vaccine that reliably protects against pulmonary TB, and although antibiotics can be curative, the long (≥6-month) course of treatment and increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant Mtb strains has spurred a search for alternative therapeutics[19,20]. Recent studies have demonstrated that an enhanced type I interferon (IFN) signature correlates with[4,5] and can predict progression to active TB up to 18 months prior to diagnosis[2,3,6,7]. In addition, a partial loss-of-function polymorphism in the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1) is associated with resistance to TB in humans[21]. A small number of cases also link IFN treatment during chronic viral infections with increased susceptibility to TB[6,7,22-24]. In addition, numerous animal studies have demonstrated causal roles for type I IFNs in susceptibility to Mtb[6,7,9,15,16,25-27] and other bacterial infections[18,28]. Given the potential association between type I IFNs and susceptibility to human TB, we sought to determine the mechanisms by which type I IFNs mediate susceptibility to active TB, with the hope this knowledge could be exploited to develop interventions. Mechanistic studies and initial trials of possible therapeutics require a robust animal model. However, the most commonly used animal model, the C57BL/6 (B6) mouse, does not robustly recapitulate the IFN-driven TB susceptibility that appears to occur in humans. B6.Ifnar−/− mice show mild resistance to Mtb in the spleen and variable but modest effects in the lungs[8-11,15]. Another model of IFN-driven susceptibility involves treatment of Mtb-infected B6 mice with poly-IC, a potent inducer of type I IFNs[9,16]. Such treatment dramatically increases susceptibility to Mtb in an Ifnar-dependent manner[9,16], but because the IFN is induced artificially via signaling pathways such as TLR3 or MDA5 that may not be engaged by Mtb itself, it is unclear if poly-IC treatment mimics the course of IFN-driven disease in humans. The 129 mouse strain shows clear IFN-driven susceptibility to Mtb[26], but there are limited tools on this genetic background. As an alternative approach, we turned to a previously described congenic mouse strain, B6.Sst1, that carries the 10.7Mb ‘super susceptibility to tuberculosis 1’ region of mouse chromosome 1 from C3HeB/FeJ mice on an otherwise B6 genetic background[12,13]. B6.Sst1 mice exhibit marked susceptibility to aerosol Mtb infection[12,13], though how the Sst1 locus confers susceptibility remains incompletely understood. Recent work has established that bone-marrow macrophages (BMMs) from B6.Sst1 mice exhibit an enhanced type I IFN response[29,30], as we confirm (Extended Data 1). In addition, we found that infected B6.Sst1 lungs exhibited higher levels of Ifnb transcripts as compared to B6 (Fig. 1a). To investigate whether this enhanced type I IFN signaling causes the susceptibility of B6.Sst1 mice to Mtb, we treated Mtb-infected mice with an IFNAR1-blocking antibody[31] to inhibit type I IFN signaling. B6.Sst1 mice treated with the IFNAR1-blocking antibody showed significantly decreased bacterial burdens compared to those that only received an isotype control antibody (Fig. 1b). To provide genetic confirmation of this result, we crossed B6.Sst1 mice to B6.Ifnar−/− mice. Ifnar deficiency largely reversed the enhanced susceptibility of B6.Sst1 mice to Mtb infection. At 25 days post-infection, the lung bacterial burdens of B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice were significantly lower than those of B6.Sst1 mice, and were similar to B6 mice (Fig. 1c). Infected B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice also survived significantly longer than B6.Sst1 mice (Fig. 1d), though there are also clearly Ifnar-independent effects of the Sst1 locus that act at later time points. By contrast, and consistent with prior reports[8,10,11], Ifnar deficiency had little or no effect on Mtb disease in wild-type B6 mice. Recent data have suggested that the host protein STING is required for interferon induction to Mtb[32-37]. However, crossing B6.Sst1 mice to STING-deficient Sting mice did not significantly reduce bacterial burdens at day-25 compared to B6.Sst1 mice (Extended Data 2a). The B6.Sst1Sting mice did show a slight improvement in survival not seen in the B6 genetic background[36] (Extended Data 2b). Overall our data demonstrate that the Sst1 locus acts directly or indirectly to increase type I IFN signaling in vivo and thereby exacerbate Mtb infection, particularly during the early phases of infection.
Extended Data 1 ∣

B6.Sst1 BMMs overexpress Ifnb and ISGs when stimulated with TNFα.

a-b, Expression of Ifnb (a) or selected ISGs (b) in BMMs measured by RT-qPCR. Results normalized to housekeeping genes. Representative data of at least two independent experiments.

Fig. 1 ∣

Type I IFN drives enhanced susceptibility of B6.Sst1 mice.

a, Expression of Ifnb in Mtb-infected lungs at day 25, measured by quantitative RT-PCR, normalized to Rps17. b, Lung bacterial burdens at day 25 from Mtb-infected mice treated with anti-IFNAR1 or isotype control antibody. c, Lung bacterial burdens at day 25, or d, survival, of Mtb-infected mice. c-d, Combined results from three independent infections. Sample size n: B6 = 6, B6.Sst1 = 8, B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− = 4 (a); B6 = 6, isotype = 7, anti-IFNAR1 = 7 (b); B6 = 18, Ifnar−/− = 6, B6.Sst1 = 19, B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− = 16 (c); B6 = 18, B6.Sst1 = 21, B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− = 16 (d). For a-d, all except B6 mice were bred in-house. Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a-c) or two-ended Log-rank test (d). Asterisk, p ≤ 0.05; two asterisks, p ≤ 0.01; three asterisks, p ≤ 0.001.

Extended Data 2 ∣

B6.Sst1 partially rescues the enhance susceptibility of B6.Sst1 mice to Mtb.

Mice were infected with Mtb and measured for lung bacterial burdens at day 25 (a) or survival (b). a, combined results of 2 experiments. Sample size n (B6, B6.Sst1, B6.Sst1) = 11, 11, 12 (a); 11, 11, 11 (b). All animals except 5 of the B6 were bred in-house (a) and all except B6 were bred in-house (b). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a) or two-ended Log-rank test (b). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.

Type I IFN negatively regulates anti-bacterial immune responses via multiple mechanisms[6,7,18], including through increased IL-10 levels[15-17], decreased IFNγ signaling[38,39], induction of cholesterol 25-hydroxylase (Ch25h)[40], and/or decreased IL-1 levels[15,16,41]. We did not observe significant differences between B6 or B6.Sst1 mice in IL-10 or IFNγ levels in the lung during Mtb infection (Extended Data 3a, b). Crossing B6.Sst1 mice to B6.Ch25h−/− mice did not alter day-25 lung bacterial burdens (Extended Data 3c). Moreover, despite clear evidence that type I IFN and IL-1 counter-regulate each other[15,16,41,42], the Sst1 locus did not appear to decrease the levels of IL-1 in vivo; in fact, we unexpectedly observed higher levels of both IL-1α and IL-1β in the lungs of B6.Sst1 mice at 25 days post-infection as compared to B6 mice (Fig. 2a,b, associated CFU in Extended Data 3d). Other inflammatory mediators, including TNF and CXCL1 were similarly elevated in the B6.Sst1 mice (Extended Data 3e, f) as was the frequency of CD11b+Ly6G+ cells (neutrophils) in the lungs (Extended Data 3g). The elevated inflammation in B6.Sst1 mice was a direct or indirect consequence of elevated type I IFNs, as inflammatory cytokines and neutrophils were reduced in B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice (Fig. 2a,b and Extended Data 3a,b,e-g).
Extended Data 3 ∣

Enhanced inflammation in B6.Sst1 mice requires type I IFN.

a, b, e, f, Protein levels of IL-10 (a), IFNγ (b), TNF (e), and CXCL1 (f) were measured in lungs of Mtb-infected mice at day 25. Combined results of at least three independent infections (a, b, e, f). c, Lung bacterial burden of Mtb-infected mice at day 25 (representative of two independent infections). Input dose: average 100CFU/mouse. d, CFU corresponding to Figure 2a and b. Combined results that include those already shown in Figures 1c, 2c, and Extended Data 3a. Input dose: average 10-89CFU/mouse. g, Neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+) from lungs of Mtb-infected mice were enumerated on day 14 and day 25. Combined results of two independent infections. All animals except B6 were bred in-house (a-f); all animals were bred in-house (g). Sample size n (B6, B6.Sst1, B6.Sst1) = 16, 18, 16 (a); 40, 45, 32 (b); 40, 44, 32 (d); 25, 29, 16 (e); 28, 30, 26 (f); 6 for all genotypes (c); 9 for all genotypes (g). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a-g). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001

Fig. 2 ∣

IFNAR signaling results in high but non-pathological IL-1 protein levels in B6.Sst1 mice.

a-b, Protein levels of IL-1α (a) and IL-1β (b) were measured in the lungs of Mtb-infected mice at day 25. Combined results of four independent experiments. n: B6 = 41, B6.Sst1 = 46, B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− = 33 (a-b). c, Lung bacterial burdens at day 25 from Mtb-infected mice treated with anti-IL1R1 or isotype control antibody. n (from left as shown) =5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6. All animals except B6 were bred in-house (a-c). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a-c). Asterisk, p ≤ 0.05; two asterisks, p ≤ 0.01; three asterisks, p ≤ 0.001.

We reasoned that the high levels of IL-1α/β in B6.Sst1 mice may be a consequence of the higher bacterial burdens in these mice, or alternatively, may be causing increased bacterial replication via induction of a pro-bacterial inflammatory milieu, as previously proposed[43,44]. To distinguish these possibilities, we inhibited IL-1 signaling in vivo using an anti-IL-1R1 blocking antibody[45] (Fig. 2c, Extended Data 4a). Both B6 and B6.Sst1 mice treated with IL-1R1 blocking antibody exhibited increased bacterial burdens compared to mice treated with an isotype control antibody. These results confirm prior evidence that IL-1 is protective in B6 mice[46-52], and extend this observation to B6.Sst1 mice as well. Thus, elevated IL-1 levels do not explain the exacerbated infections of B6.Sst1 mice. Instead, it appears that elevated IL-1 levels are a consequence of increased bacterial burdens in these mice. Although IL-1 is clearly protective during Mtb infection of B6 mice, the elevated levels of IL-1α/β proteins seen in B6.Sst1 mice for some reason fail to control Mtb.
Extended Data 4 ∣

IL-1 blockade increases susceptibility in both B6 and B6.Sst1 mice.

a-c, mice were infected with average 15CFU/mouse and were treated with anti-IL1R1 or isotype control antibodies, and on day 25 the lungs were measured for bacterial burden (a), IL-1Ra protein levels (b), and IL-1 bioactivity (c). Sample size n (in order shown, from left) = 7, 7, 8, 8 (a); 7, 8, 9, 8 (b-c). d, Mice were infected with average 78CFU/mouse and IL-1 bioactivity was measured in the lungs at day 25. n = 5 for both samples. e, Mice were infected with average 33CFU/mouse. IL-1 bioactivity was measured in lung samples collected on the indicated days. n = 6 for all samples except day 36 B6.Sst1 = 4. Day 25 data already shown in Fig. 3d. All animals except B6 were bred in-house (a-c); all were bred in-house (d-e). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a-c). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.

Type I IFNs induce the expression of hundreds of target genes. However, given that IL-1 signaling is essential for resistance to Mtb[46-52], we were particularly interested in Il1rn, which encodes the secreted IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra)[53]. IL-1Ra binds to IL-1R1 without signaling and blocks binding of IL-1α/β[54] (Fig. 3a). Il1rn is induced during Mtb infection[15,16] and by type I IFN signaling[55,56]. As expected, B6.Sst1 BMMs strongly upregulated Il1rn in an Ifnar-dependent manner when stimulated with TNF (Fig. 3b). Similarly, Mtb-infected B6.Sst1 mice had higher levels of IL-1Ra protein in their lungs, as compared to B6 or B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice (Fig. 3c, Extended Data 4b). These results raised the possibility that the high IL-1 protein levels in B6.Sst1 mice are inadequate to protect against infection because of a block in IL-1 signaling.
Fig. 3 ∣

Elevated IL-1Ra and decreased functional IL-1 signaling in Mtb-infected B6.Sst1 mice.

a, Schematic of IL-1R signaling. b, Il1rn expression in BMMs treated with 10 ng/ml TNFα for 24 hours. c, IL-1Ra protein levels and d, IL-1 reporter assay measuring functional IL-1 activity in lungs of Mtb-infected mice at day 25. Sample size n: B6 = 6, B6.Sst1 = 6, B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− = 6 (c); B6 = 17, Ifnar−/− = 11, B6.Sst1 = 17, B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− = 17 (d). Combined results of three independent infections (d) or representative of at least two independent experiments (b, c). All animals except B6 were bred in-house (c-d). Center and error bars show mean and SEM (c, d). Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (c, d). Asterisk, p ≤ 0.05; two asterisks, p ≤ 0.01; three asterisks, p ≤ 0.001.

To assess the levels of functional IL-1 signaling in the lungs of infected mice, we employed an IL-1 reporter bioassay to measure IL-1 activity in cell-free supernatant of dissociated lungs. Despite higher levels of IL-1 proteins, lungs from infected B6.Sst1 mice appeared to have generally less functional IL-1 signaling capacity as compared with B6 mice (Fig. 3d, Extended Data 4c). The lower levels of IL-1 signaling seen in B6.Sst1 mice was reversed in B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice (Fig. 3d). The reporter appeared to be a reliable indicator of functional IL-1, as responses in the bioassay were blocked by anti-IL-1R1 antibody (Extended Data 4c). These results underline the importance of measuring IL-1 activity versus merely assessing the levels of IL-1 proteins. However, we noted significant variability in the measurable IL-1 activity in the lungs of Mtb-infected mice. In fact, the lungs of some B6.Sst1 mice exhibited elevated, rather than reduced, IL-1 activity (e.g., 3 of 17 mice shown in Fig. 3d). In addition, in infections with higher initial doses, we failed to detect a difference in the IL-1 activity in the lungs of B6.Sst1 versus B6 mice (an example is shown in Extended Data 4d). Conversely, the susceptibility of B6.Sst1 mice is highly consistent (Figs. 1c, 2c, Extended Data 2a, 3c-d, 4a). Thus, we hypothesized that low IL-1 signaling may only be a transient phenotype in B6.Sst1 mice. To address this possibility, we assessed the timing of IL-1 activity in the lung by performing a time course experiment (Extended Data 4e). We found that at 14 days post-infection, IL-1 activity measurable by bioassay was low in all strains. At 25 days post-infection, there was marked variability in the measurable IL-1 responses of B6.Sst1 mice: some mice exhibited the expected defect in IL-1 activity as compared to B6 or B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice, whereas others were already exhibiting high IL-1 activity levels. By 36 days post-infection, all mice exhibited high IL-1 activity regardless of genotype. Thus, it appears that once the susceptible phenotype of B6.Sst1 mice manifests, and CFU levels rise, the level of functional IL-1 increases concordantly. Interestingly, this late rise in IL-1 activity appears insufficient to protect the mice. It was previously reported that IL-1 acts at early timepoints after infection, i.e., prior to day15 post-infection[57]. At early timepoints, when IL-1 may be acting locally at infection foci, the bioassay (performed on total lung) is unable to detect functional IL-1. Thus, we conclude that although specific infection conditions and assay timepoints can reveal a functional deficit in IL-1 signaling in B6.Sst1 mice, our IL-1 bioassay is generally an insensitive tool for measuring protective IL-1 activity in vivo. Given the above considerations, we sought genetic evidence to address whether excessive type I IFN signaling neutralizes IL-1 signaling via IL-1Ra in B6.Sst1 mice during Mtb infection. Accordingly, we crossed B6.Sst1 to Il1rn−/− mice[58]. Since uninfected Il1rn−/− mice exhibit signs of inflammatory disease due to dysregulated IL-1 signaling[54,58,59], and because Il1rn+/− mice have a partial decrease in IL-1Ra levels[58], we generated both heterozygous B6.Sst1Il1rn+/− and homozygous B6.Sst1Il1rn−/− mice. Both heterozygous and homozygous Il1rn deficiency protected B6.Sst1 mice from Mtb (Fig. 4a-d, Extended Data 5a). In fact, bacterial burdens in B6.Sst1Il1rn−/− mice were even lower than those found in ‘resistant’ B6 mice (Fig. 4a). B6.Sst1Il1rn−/− mice survived only modestly longer than B6.Sst1 mice (Fig. 4b), but this was expected since even uninfected Il1rn−/− mice exhibit shortened lifespans due to spontaneous inflammatory disease[59]. Notably, a partial reduction in IL-1Ra levels in heterozygous B6.Sst1Il1rn+/− was sufficient to almost entirely reverse the enhanced IFN-driven susceptibility of Sst1 mice (Fig. 4a-d). In fact, the bacterial burdens, survival and body weights of B6.Sst1Il1rn+/− mice resembled that of B6 mice (Fig. 4a-c, Extended Data 5a). Histological samples of infected lungs showed significant reduction in lesion sizes in both B6.Sst1Il1rn+/− and B6.Sst1Il1rn−/− mice compared to B6.Sst1 (Fig. 4d). Lungs of B6.Sst1Il1rn+/− mice infected with a low dose of Mtb (~14 CFU) had greater IL-1 bioactivity at day-21 than B6.Sst1 (Extended Data 5b), but a difference in IL-1 activity was not detectable in mice infected with a higher dose (~55 CFU) (Extended Data 5c), again illustrating the limitations of the IL-1 bioassay as discussed above. Nevertheless, control of the infection in Il1rn-deficient mice depended on IL-1 receptor signaling, as B6.Sst1Il1rn+/− or B6.Sst1Il1rn−/− mice treated with a blocking anti-IL-1R1 antibody[45] exhibited higher bacterial burdens than untreated mice (Extended Data 5e). These data and the known biology of IL-1Ra strongly imply that protection afforded by the loss of IL-1Ra is mediated by enhanced IL-1 signaling, though it is formally possible that Il1rn deficiency protects the B6.Sst1 mice via a mechanism unrelated to IL-1 and that neutralization of IL-1 signaling dominantly overcomes this protection. Despite decreased bacterial burdens, the lungs of B6.Sst1Il1rn+/− mice had similar levels of Ifnb or other IFN-induced transcripts as B6.Sst1 mice (Extended Data 5d). These results are consistent with a model in which IL-1Ra acts downstream of type I IFN signaling, and does not contribute to reducing Ifnb levels other than by reducing overall bacteria burden.
Fig. 4 ∣

Inhibition of IL-1Ra rescues the susceptibility of B6.Sst1 mice.

a-d, Mtb-infected mice (20CFU/mouse) were measured for (a) bacterial burdens in the lungs at day 25, (b) survival, (c) body weight or (d) lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histology. For c, arrow indicates where 4/21 mice reached end-point. Color of statistics indicates relevant genotype as compared to B6. e-g, Mtb-infected mice (32CFU/mouse) were treated with anti-IL1Ra antibody or PBS and (d) lung bacterial burdens were measured at day 25, or (f) day 25 lung sections were stained with H&E, or (e) body weights were recorded over time. Combined results of four (a) or two (b) experiments. c, d-g, representative results of two experiments. Sample size n (a-c): B6, B6.Sst1, B6.Sst1Il1rn, B6.Sst1Il1rn−/− = 24, 30, 25, 17 (a); 17, 21, 24, 10 (b); 11, 12, 21, 10 (c). Sample size n (e-f): B6 PBS =8, B6 anti-IL1Ra = 8, B6.Sst1 PBS = 9, B6.Sst1 anti-IL1Ra = 8. All were bred in-house, and all except B6 and B6.Sst1 were littermates (a-d); B6.Sst1 were bred in-house (e-g). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a, c, e, f) or two-ended Log-rank test (b). Asterisk, p ≤ 0.05; two asterisks, p ≤ 0.01; three asterisks, p ≤ 0.001.

Extended Data 5 ∣

Homozygous or heterozygous Il1rn deletion protects B6.Sst1 mice from Mtb infection.

a, Body weights on day 28 of individual mice shown in Fig. 4c. b-c, Mice were infected with Mtb at average 14CFU/mouse (b) or 55CFU/mouse (c), and at day 21 lungs were harvested to measure IL-1 bioactivity. d, RT-qPCR on lungs of Mtb-infected mice, sampled at 25 days post-infection. Each graph combined results from 2 independent experiments. e-f, Mice infected with average 20 CFU/mouse were treated with either anti-IL-1R1 antibody or isotype control every 3 days starting 7 days post-infection (e), or anti-IL-1Ra antibody or PBS control every other day starting 3 days post-infection (f). At 25 days post-infection lungs were harvested for measuring bacterial burden. Sample size n (from left as shown) = 11, 12, 22, 10(a); 6, 8, 11(b); 6, 8, 10(c); 11, 14, 11, 5(d); 5, 6, 3, 4, 2, 3(e); 8, 8, 6, 6(f). All mice were bred in-house (a, d-f) or all except B6 were bred in-house (b-c); and all except B6 and B6.Sst1 were littermates (a, d, e). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.

The dramatic protective effects of even partial reductions in IL-1Ra in B6.Sst1 mice suggested that IL-1Ra might be a suitable target for host-directed therapy during Mtb infection. To test this, we treated infected B6.Sst1 mice with an anti-IL-1Ra antibody[60] to block IL-1Ra and restore IL-1 signaling. B6.Sst1 mice that received the antibody had significantly lower bacterial burdens in their lungs as compared to PBS-treated controls (Fig. 4e). In addition, mice treated with anti-IL-1Ra antibody retained significantly more body weight than the controls (Fig. 4f) and exhibited reduced lung lesions (Fig. 4g), suggesting that the treatment did not cause detrimental inflammation. To determine if IL-1Ra acts downstream of type I IFN-signaling, we neutralized IL-1Ra in B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice (Extended Data 5f). Bacterial burdens were similar between B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice treated with the anti-IL1Ra antibody and control, consistent with the low expression of IL-1Ra in B6.Sst1Ifnar−/− mice (Fig. 3c), whereas antibody-treated B6.Sst1 mice exhibited reduced CFU. Overall these data indicate that genetic or antibody-mediated reduction of IL-1Ra can rescue the type I IFN-driven susceptibility to tuberculosis in B6.Sst1 mice without overt detrimental immunopathology. The Sst1 locus spans ~10Mb and encodes ~50 genes. Collectively our data indicate that in B6 (Sst1) mice, the Sst1 locus acts directly or indirectly to repress type I IFN signaling, though the underlying molecular mechanism is unknown. Previously, Sst1 mice were found to lack expression of Ipr1 (also called Sp110) and re-expression of B6-derived Ipr1/Sp110 partially restores resistance to Mtb[12]. Thus, loss of Ipr1/Sp110 may account for the Sst1 phenotype, though this remains to be confirmed by the generation of B6.Ipr1−/− mice. Polymorphisms in human SP110 are associated with TB disease in some but not all cohorts[61-68]. Ipr1/Sp110 is a member of the Sp100 family of transcriptional regulators that also includes Sp100, Sp140, and Aire. SP100 proteins contain chromatin-binding domains and regulate gene expression. It is tempting to speculate that IPR1/SP110 modulates the chromatin state of type I IFNs and/or IFN-induced genes, though future studies are necessary to establish the molecular basis of the Sst1 phenotype. There is increasing interest in developing host-directed therapeutics for Mtb[20]. Although such therapeutics have not yet proven to be curative, and are unlikely to replace antibiotics, they may be advantageous in specific scenarios. For example, host-directed therapy could serve as an adjunct to antibiotics for MDR or XDR-TB, which are associated with high mortality rates[69,70]. If indeed type I IFNs exacerbate TB disease in humans, then a host-directed therapy targeting IL-1Ra, alone or in combination with other host-directed interventions[16], might represent a promising approach. Targeting IL-1Ra may be preferable to blockade of upstream type I IFNs, which might exacerbate viral infections. Regardless, our results show that the B6.Sst1 mouse represents a useful model that permits genetic dissection of the molecular mechanisms underlying IFN-driven TB disease.

Methods

Mice.

All mice were specific pathogen-free, maintained under a 12-hr light-dark cycle (7AM to 7PM), and given a standard chow diet (Harlan irradiated laboratory animal diet) ad libitum. Within each experiment mice of all genotypes were age-matched at 6-10 weeks old at the beginning of infections. Whenever possible we used comparable numbers of each sex across all genotypes in an experiment. Mice work was not subjected to randomization or data blinding. C57BL/6J (B6), B6.129S-Il1rn/J (Il1rn−/−, Jax #004754)[58], B6(Cg)-Ifnar1/J (Ifnar−/−, Jax #028288) and B6.129S6-/J (Ch25h−/−, JAx #016263)[71] were originally purchased from Jackson Laboratories and subsequently bred at UC Berkeley. B6J.C3-Sst1C3HeB/FeJKrmn mice (referred to as B6.Sst1 throughout) were from the colony of I. Kramnik at Boston University and then transferred to UC Berkeley. Sting mice were previously described[72]. All animals used in experiments were bred in-house unless otherwise noted in the figure legends. All animal experiments complied with the regulatory standards of, and were approved by, the University of California Berkeley Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections.

Mtb strain Erdman (gift of S.A. Stanley) was used for all infections. Frozen stocks of this wild-type strain were made from a single culture and used for all experiments. Cultures for infection were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 liquid medium supplemented with 10% albumin-dextrose-saline, 0.4% glycerol and 0.05% Tween-80 for five days at 37°C. Mice were aerosol infected using an inhalation exposure system (Glas-Col, Terre Haute, IN). Cultures were diluted to deliver ~20 to 100 bacteria per mouse as measured by colony forming units (CFUs) in the lungs 1 day following infection, depending on the experiment. Mice were sacrificed at various days post-infection as indicated in the figure legends to measure CFUs and/or cytokines. All but one lung lobe was homogenized in PBS plus 0.05% Tween-80 or processed for cytokines (see below), and serial dilutions were plated on 7H11 plates supplemented with 10% oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, catalase (OADC) and 0.5% glycerol. CFUs were counted 21-25 days after plating. The remaining lobe was used for histology or for RNA extraction. For histology the sample was fixed in 10% formalin for at least 48 hours then stored in 70% ethanol. Samples were sent to Histowiz Inc for embedding in wax, sectioning and hemotoxylin and eosin staining. Samples for RNA were preserved with RNAlater™ solution (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer specifications for later processing.

Cytokine measurements.

Cell-free lung homogenates were generated as previously described[47]. Briefly, lungs were dissociated through 100μm Falcon cell strainers in sterile PBS with 1% FBS and Pierce Protease Inhibitor EDTA-free (Thermo Fisher). An aliquot was removed for measuring CFU by plating as described above. Cells and debris were then removed by first a low-speed centrifugation (approximately 300×g) then a high-speed centrifugation (approximately 2000×g) and the resulting cell-free homogenate was filtered twice with 0.2μm filters to remove all Mtb for work outside of BSL3. All homogenates were aliquoted, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Each aliquot was thawed a maximum of twice to avoid potential artifacts due to repeated freeze-thaw cycles. All cytokines except IL-10 and IL-1Ra was measured using Cytometric Bead Assay (BD Biosciences) according to manufacturer protocols. Results were collected using BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FCAP Array v3.0. IL-10 levels were measured using Mouse IL-10 ELISA Ready-SET-Go! (2nd Generation, eBioscience). IL-1Ra levels were measured by ELISA using Mouse IL-1ra/IL-1F3 Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) according to manufacturer protocols.

IL-1 bioactivity reporter assay.

Mice infected with low dose of Mtb (see text for discussion) were used to prepare cell-free lung homogenates. Samples were assayed using HEK-Blue™ IL-1R cells (InvivoGen). Cells were authenticated and tested for mycoplasma by the manufacturer. All experiments use cells under 6 passages from the original stock. 3.75×104 cells/well were plated in 96-well plates, and allowed to adhere overnight in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2mM glutamine, 100U/ml streptomycin and 100μg/ml penicillin. Over-confluence decreases the accuracy of the assay. Cells were treated with 50μl cell-free lung homogenates or standard curve made from recombinant mouse IL-1β (R&D systems 401-ML-005) mixed with 50ul of media overnight. Assays were developed using QUANTI-Blue (InvivoGen) according to manufacturer protocols.

Flow cytometry.

Lungs were perfused with 10 ml of cold PBS and dissociated through 40μm cell strainers. Aliquots were removed for quantifying CFU. Cells were washed and stained with fixable viability dye (Thermo Fisher 65-0865-14). An aliquot of cells from each sample were removed and mixed with counting beads (Thermo Fisher C36950) for later enumeration. The rest of the cells were incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 monoclonal antibody to block Fc receptors (Thermo Fisher 14-0161-81), then with antibodies for surface staining. The following antigens were stained for: CD45 (30-F11, Biolegend 103107), CD11b (M1/70, Thermo Fisher 48-0112-82), CD11c (N418, Biolegend 117335), Ly6G (1A8, BD Biosciences 740554), Ly6C (HK1.4, Thermo Fisher 17-5932-80), CD24 (M1/69, BD Bioscience 564664), MHC II (M5/114.15.2, Biolegend 107625), SiglecF (E50-2440, BD Biosciences 562680). Cells were fixed with fixation buffer (BD Biosciences 554714) for at least 1 hour at room temperature and stored in PBS with 1% FBS and 2mM EDTA overnight at 4°C in the dark. Data were acquired on a BD Fortessa X-20 flow cytometer and analyzed with FlowJo v10.

Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) and TNF-treatment.

Bone marrow was harvested from mouse femurs and tibias, and cells were differentiated by culture on non-tissue culture-treated plates in RPMI supplemented with supernatant from 3T3-MCSF cells (gift of B. Beutler), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2mM glutamine, 100 U/ml streptomycin and 100 μg/ml penicillin in a humidified incubator (37°C, 5%CO2). BMMs were harvested six days after plating and frozen in 95% FBS and 5% DMSO. For in vitro experiments, BMMs were thawed into media as described above for 4 hours in a humidified 37°C incubator. Adherent cells were washed with PBS, counted and replated at 1.2×106 ~ 1.5×106 cells/well in a TC-treated 6-well plate. Cells were treated with 10ng/ml recombinant mouse TNFα (410-TRNC-010, R&D systems) diluted in the media as described above.

Quantitative RT-PCR.

Total RNA from BMMs was extract using RNeasy total RNA kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer specifications. Total lung RNA was extracted by homogenizing the tissue in TRIzol reagent (Life technologies) then mixing thoroughly with chloroform, both done under BSL3 conditions. Samples were then removed from the BSL3 facility and transferred to fresh tubes under BSL2 conditions. Aqueous phase was separated by centrifugation and RNA was further purified using an RNeasy total RNA kit (Qiagen). Equal amounts of RNA from each sample were treated with DNase (RQ1, Promega) and cDNA was made using Superscript III (Invitrogen). Complementary cDNA reactions were primed with poly(dT) for the measurement of mature transcripts. Quantitative PCR was performed using QuantiStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with Power Sybr Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according manufacturer specifications. Transcript levels were normalized to housekeeping genes Rps17, Actb and Oaz1 unless otherwise specified. The following primers were used in this study. Rps17 sense: CGCCATTATCCC CAGCAAG; Rps17 antisense: TGTCGGGATCCACCTCAATG; Oaz1 sense: GTGGTGGCCTCTACATCGAG; Oaz1 antisense: AGCAGATGAAAACGTGGTCAG; Actb sense: CGCAGCCACTGTCGAGTC; Actb antisense: CCTTCTGACCCATTCCCACC; Ifnb sense: GTCCTCAACTGCTCTCCACT; Ifnb antisense: CCTGCAACCACCACTCATTC; Il1rn sense: CGCCCTTCTGGGAAAAGACC, Il1rn antisense: CCGTGGATGCCCAAGAACAC; Gbp5 sense: TGTTCTTACTGGCCCCTGCT; Gbp5 antisense: CCAATGAGGCACAAGGGTTC; Ifit3 sense: AGCCCACACCCAGCTTTT; Ifit3 antisense: CAGAGATTCCCGGTTGACCT; Ch25h sense: CACTCGGGCTATGACTTCCC; Ch25h antisense: GAGTGCCCAGCATTTTGTCC; Irf1 sense: TGAGGAAGGGAAGATAGCCG; Irf1 antisense: TGTATGCCTATCCCAATGTCCC; Irgm1 sense: AAAACCAGAGAGCCTCACCA; 
Irgm1 antisense: ATGTTGGGGAGTAGTGGAGC; Gbp4 sense: 
TGAGTACCTGGAGAATGCCCT; Gbp4 antisense: TGGCCGAATTGGATGCTTGG; Stat1 sense: CAGAAAAACGCTGGGAACAGA; Stat1 antisense: CAAGCCTGGCTGGCAC; Gbp7 sense: AGCAAGCCCAAGTTCACACT; Gbp7 antisense: TCCGCTCTGTCAGTTCTGTG.

Antibody-mediated neutralization.

For all antibody treatments, the schedules are indicated in the figures. All treatments were delivered by intraperitoneal injection. Mouse anti-mouse IFNAR1 (MAR1-5A3) and isotype control (GIR208, mouse anti-human IFNGR-α chain) were purchased from Leinco Technologies Inc. Each mouse was given 500μg per injection. Hamster anti-IL-1R1 antibody (mIL1R-M147) was obtained from Amgen[45]. Isotype control was Ultra-LEAF Purified Armenian Hamster IgG Isotype Antibody from Biolegend (400940). Each mouse was given 200μg per injection. Armenian hamster anti-IL1Ra antibody was produced in-house using a previously published hybridoma line[60]. Cells were grown in Wheaton CELLine Bioreactor Flasks (Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer instructions. Media in the cell compartment used ultra-low IgG FBS (ThermoFisher 16250078) to minimize bovine IgG contamination during purification. Cell-free supernatant from the cell compartment was purified using protein G resin (GenScript). IgG was eluted using 0.1M acetic acid, then 10% of total volume of 1M Tris pH8 and 0.5M NaCl was added to neutralize. Size exclusion and buffer exchange to PBS was performed using Amicon Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Units (EMD Millipore). The final product was filter sterilized and stored at −80°C. For injections antibody stocks were diluted in sterile PBS and each mouse received 500μg per injection.

Statistical analysis.

All survival data were analyzed with two-ended Log-rank test. All other data were analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test unless otherwise noted. Both tests were run using GraphPad Prism 5. Asterisk, p ≤ 0.05; two asterisks, p ≤ 0.01; three asterisks, p ≤ 0.001. All error bars are SEM and all center bars indicate means.

B6.Sst1 BMMs overexpress Ifnb and ISGs when stimulated with TNFα.

a-b, Expression of Ifnb (a) or selected ISGs (b) in BMMs measured by RT-qPCR. Results normalized to housekeeping genes. Representative data of at least two independent experiments.

B6.Sst1 partially rescues the enhance susceptibility of B6.Sst1 mice to Mtb.

Mice were infected with Mtb and measured for lung bacterial burdens at day 25 (a) or survival (b). a, combined results of 2 experiments. Sample size n (B6, B6.Sst1, B6.Sst1) = 11, 11, 12 (a); 11, 11, 11 (b). All animals except 5 of the B6 were bred in-house (a) and all except B6 were bred in-house (b). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a) or two-ended Log-rank test (b). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.

Enhanced inflammation in B6.Sst1 mice requires type I IFN.

a, b, e, f, Protein levels of IL-10 (a), IFNγ (b), TNF (e), and CXCL1 (f) were measured in lungs of Mtb-infected mice at day 25. Combined results of at least three independent infections (a, b, e, f). c, Lung bacterial burden of Mtb-infected mice at day 25 (representative of two independent infections). Input dose: average 100CFU/mouse. d, CFU corresponding to Figure 2a and b. Combined results that include those already shown in Figures 1c, 2c, and Extended Data 3a. Input dose: average 10-89CFU/mouse. g, Neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+) from lungs of Mtb-infected mice were enumerated on day 14 and day 25. Combined results of two independent infections. All animals except B6 were bred in-house (a-f); all animals were bred in-house (g). Sample size n (B6, B6.Sst1, B6.Sst1) = 16, 18, 16 (a); 40, 45, 32 (b); 40, 44, 32 (d); 25, 29, 16 (e); 28, 30, 26 (f); 6 for all genotypes (c); 9 for all genotypes (g). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a-g). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001

IL-1 blockade increases susceptibility in both B6 and B6.Sst1 mice.

a-c, mice were infected with average 15CFU/mouse and were treated with anti-IL1R1 or isotype control antibodies, and on day 25 the lungs were measured for bacterial burden (a), IL-1Ra protein levels (b), and IL-1 bioactivity (c). Sample size n (in order shown, from left) = 7, 7, 8, 8 (a); 7, 8, 9, 8 (b-c). d, Mice were infected with average 78CFU/mouse and IL-1 bioactivity was measured in the lungs at day 25. n = 5 for both samples. e, Mice were infected with average 33CFU/mouse. IL-1 bioactivity was measured in lung samples collected on the indicated days. n = 6 for all samples except day 36 B6.Sst1 = 4. Day 25 data already shown in Fig. 3d. All animals except B6 were bred in-house (a-c); all were bred in-house (d-e). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test (a-c). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.

Homozygous or heterozygous Il1rn deletion protects B6.Sst1 mice from Mtb infection.

a, Body weights on day 28 of individual mice shown in Fig. 4c. b-c, Mice were infected with Mtb at average 14CFU/mouse (b) or 55CFU/mouse (c), and at day 21 lungs were harvested to measure IL-1 bioactivity. d, RT-qPCR on lungs of Mtb-infected mice, sampled at 25 days post-infection. Each graph combined results from 2 independent experiments. e-f, Mice infected with average 20 CFU/mouse were treated with either anti-IL-1R1 antibody or isotype control every 3 days starting 7 days post-infection (e), or anti-IL-1Ra antibody or PBS control every other day starting 3 days post-infection (f). At 25 days post-infection lungs were harvested for measuring bacterial burden. Sample size n (from left as shown) = 11, 12, 22, 10(a); 6, 8, 11(b); 6, 8, 10(c); 11, 14, 11, 5(d); 5, 6, 3, 4, 2, 3(e); 8, 8, 6, 6(f). All mice were bred in-house (a, d-f) or all except B6 were bred in-house (b-c); and all except B6 and B6.Sst1 were littermates (a, d, e). Center and error bars show mean and SEM. Analyzed with two-ended Mann-Whitney test. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.
  65 in total

1.  Intranasal Poly-IC treatment exacerbates tuberculosis in mice through the pulmonary recruitment of a pathogen-permissive monocyte/macrophage population.

Authors:  Lis R V Antonelli; Antonio Gigliotti Rothfuchs; Ricardo Gonçalves; Ester Roffê; Allen W Cheever; Andre Bafica; Andres M Salazar; Carl G Feng; Alan Sher
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  The Type I IFN response to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires ESX-1-mediated secretion and contributes to pathogenesis.

Authors:  Sarah A Stanley; James E Johndrow; Paolo Manzanillo; Jeffery S Cox
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Dynamic roles of type I and type II IFNs in early infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ludovic Desvignes; Andrea J Wolf; Joel D Ernst
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  An interferon-inducible neutrophil-driven blood transcriptional signature in human tuberculosis.

Authors:  Matthew P R Berry; Christine M Graham; Finlay W McNab; Zhaohui Xu; Susannah A A Bloch; Tolu Oni; Katalin A Wilkinson; Romain Banchereau; Jason Skinner; Robert J Wilkinson; Charles Quinn; Derek Blankenship; Ranju Dhawan; John J Cush; Asuncion Mejias; Octavio Ramilo; Onn M Kon; Virginia Pascual; Jacques Banchereau; Damien Chaussabel; Anne O'Garra
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Type I IFN Inhibits Alternative Macrophage Activation during Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Leads to Enhanced Protection in the Absence of IFN-γ Signaling.

Authors:  Lúcia Moreira-Teixeira; Jeremy Sousa; Finlay W McNab; Egídio Torrado; Filipa Cardoso; Henrique Machado; Flávia Castro; Vânia Cardoso; Joana Gaifem; Xuemei Wu; Rui Appelberg; António Gil Castro; Anne O'Garra; Margarida Saraiva
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 6.  Type I Interferons in the Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis: Molecular Drivers and Immunological Consequences.

Authors:  Meg L Donovan; Thomas E Schultz; Taylor J Duke; Antje Blumenthal
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Sequential inflammatory processes define human progression from M. tuberculosis infection to tuberculosis disease.

Authors:  Thomas J Scriba; Adam Penn-Nicholson; Smitha Shankar; Tom Hraha; Ethan G Thompson; David Sterling; Elisa Nemes; Fatoumatta Darboe; Sara Suliman; Lynn M Amon; Hassan Mahomed; Mzwandile Erasmus; Wendy Whatney; John L Johnson; W Henry Boom; Mark Hatherill; Joe Valvo; Mary Ann De Groote; Urs A Ochsner; Alan Aderem; Willem A Hanekom; Daniel E Zak
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 8.  Type I interferons in tuberculosis: Foe and occasionally friend.

Authors:  Lúcia Moreira-Teixeira; Katrin Mayer-Barber; Alan Sher; Anne O'Garra
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 17.579

9.  A modular transcriptional signature identifies phenotypic heterogeneity of human tuberculosis infection.

Authors:  Akul Singhania; Raman Verma; Christine M Graham; Jo Lee; Trang Tran; Matthew Richardson; Patrick Lecine; Philippe Leissner; Matthew P R Berry; Robert J Wilkinson; Karine Kaiser; Marc Rodrigue; Gerrit Woltmann; Pranabashis Haldar; Anne O'Garra
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A blood RNA signature for tuberculosis disease risk: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel E Zak; Adam Penn-Nicholson; Thomas J Scriba; Ethan Thompson; Sara Suliman; Lynn M Amon; Hassan Mahomed; Mzwandile Erasmus; Wendy Whatney; Gregory D Hussey; Deborah Abrahams; Fazlin Kafaar; Tony Hawkridge; Suzanne Verver; E Jane Hughes; Martin Ota; Jayne Sutherland; Rawleigh Howe; Hazel M Dockrell; W Henry Boom; Bonnie Thiel; Tom H M Ottenhoff; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Amelia C Crampin; Katrina Downing; Mark Hatherill; Joe Valvo; Smitha Shankar; Shreemanta K Parida; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Gerhard Walzl; Alan Aderem; Willem A Hanekom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  38 in total

1.  Mucosal Vaccination with Cyclic Dinucleotide Adjuvants Induces Effective T Cell Homing and IL-17-Dependent Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection.

Authors:  Robyn M Jong; Erik Van Dis; Samuel B Berry; Xammy Nguyenla; Alexander Baltodano; Gabrielle Pastenkos; Chenling Xu; Douglas Fox; Nir Yosef; Sarah M McWhirter; Sarah A Stanley
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Ifnar gene variants influence gut microbial production of palmitoleic acid and host immune responses to tuberculosis.

Authors:  Lingming Chen; Guoliang Zhang; Guobao Li; Wei Wang; Zhenhuang Ge; Yi Yang; Xing He; Zhi Liu; Zhiyi Zhang; Qiongdan Mai; Yiwei Chen; Zixu Chen; Jiang Pi; Shuai Yang; Jun Cui; Haipeng Liu; Ling Shen; Lingchan Zeng; Lin Zhou; Xinchun Chen; Baoxue Ge; Zheng W Chen; Gucheng Zeng
Journal:  Nat Metab       Date:  2022-03-14

3.  Pulmonary mucosal immunity mediated through CpG provides adequate protection against pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the mouse model. A role for type I interferon.

Authors:  Amber Troy; Sandra C Esparza-Gonzalez; Alicia Bartek; Elizabeth Creissen; Linda Izzo; Angelo A Izzo
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.131

4.  Secretion of c-di-AMP by Listeria monocytogenes Leads to a STING-Dependent Antibacterial Response during Enterocolitis.

Authors:  Alexander Louie; Varaang Bhandula; Daniel A Portnoy
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Hierarchical cluster analysis of cytokine profiles reveals a cutaneous vasculitis-associated subgroup in dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Jingjing Bai; Chanyuan Wu; Danli Zhong; Dong Xu; Qian Wang; Xiaofeng Zeng
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  IL-1R1-Dependent Signals Improve Control of Cytosolic Virulent Mycobacteria In Vivo.

Authors:  Sanne van der Niet; Maaike van Zon; Karin de Punder; Anita Grootemaat; Sofie Rutten; Simone J C F M Moorlag; Diane Houben; Astrid M van der Sar; Wilbert Bitter; Roland Brosch; Rogelio Hernandez Pando; Maria T Pena; Peter J Peters; Eric A Reits; Katrin D Mayer-Barber; Nicole N van der Wel
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.389

7.  Mycobacterial Infection of Precision-Cut Lung Slices Reveals Type 1 Interferon Pathway Is Locally Induced by Mycobacterium bovis but Not M. tuberculosis in a Cattle Breed.

Authors:  Aude Remot; Florence Carreras; Anthony Coupé; Émilie Doz-Deblauwe; Maria L Boschiroli; John A Browne; Quentin Marquant; Delphyne Descamps; Fabienne Archer; Abraham Aseffa; Pierre Germon; Stephen V Gordon; Nathalie Winter
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-09

8.  Type I interferon decreases macrophage energy metabolism during mycobacterial infection.

Authors:  Gregory S Olson; Tara A Murray; Ana N Jahn; Dat Mai; Alan H Diercks; Elizabeth S Gold; Alan Aderem
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Role of the transcriptional regulator SP140 in resistance to bacterial infections via repression of type I interferons.

Authors:  Daisy X Ji; Kristen C Witt; Dmitri I Kotov; Shally R Margolis; Alexander Louie; Victoria Chevée; Katherine J Chen; Moritz M Gaidt; Harmandeep S Dhaliwal; Angus Y Lee; Stephen L Nishimura; Dario S Zamboni; Igor Kramnik; Daniel A Portnoy; K Heran Darwin; Russell E Vance
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Underwhelming or Misunderstood? Genetic Variability of Pattern Recognition Receptors in Immune Responses and Resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Dubé; Vinicius M Fava; Erwin Schurr; Marcel A Behr
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.