BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emerging evidence indicates transgender adolescents (TGAs) exhibit elevated rates of suicidal ideation and attempt compared with cisgender adolescents (CGAs). Less is known about risk among subgroups of TGAs because of limited measures of gender identity in previous studies. We examined disparities in suicidality across the full spectrum of suicidality between TGAs and CGAs and examined risk for suicidality within TGA subgroups. METHODS: Adolescents aged 14 to 18 completed a cross-sectional online survey (N = 2020, including 1148 TGAs). Participants reported gender assigned at birth and current gender identity (categorized as cisgender males, cisgender females, transgender males, transgender females, nonbinary adolescents assigned female at birth, nonbinary adolescents assigned male at birth, and questioning gender identity). Lifetime suicidality (passive death wish, suicidal ideation, suicide plan, suicide attempt, and attempt requiring medical care) and nonsuicidal self-injury were assessed. RESULTS: Aggregated into 1 group, TGAs had higher odds of all outcomes as compared with CGAs. Within TGA subgroups, transgender males and transgender females had higher odds of suicidal ideation and attempt than CGA groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we used comprehensive measures of gender assigned at birth and current gender identity within a large nationwide survey of adolescents in the United States to examine suicidality among TGAs and CGAs. TGAs had higher odds of all suicidality outcomes, and transgender males and transgender females had high risk for suicidal ideation and attempt. Authors of future adolescent suicidality research must assess both gender assigned at birth and current gender identity to accurately identify and categorize TGAs.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emerging evidence indicates transgender adolescents (TGAs) exhibit elevated rates of suicidal ideation and attempt compared with cisgender adolescents (CGAs). Less is known about risk among subgroups of TGAs because of limited measures of gender identity in previous studies. We examined disparities in suicidality across the full spectrum of suicidality between TGAs and CGAs and examined risk for suicidality within TGA subgroups. METHODS: Adolescents aged 14 to 18 completed a cross-sectional online survey (N = 2020, including 1148 TGAs). Participants reported gender assigned at birth and current gender identity (categorized as cisgender males, cisgender females, transgender males, transgender females, nonbinary adolescents assigned female at birth, nonbinary adolescents assigned male at birth, and questioning gender identity). Lifetime suicidality (passive death wish, suicidal ideation, suicide plan, suicide attempt, and attempt requiring medical care) and nonsuicidal self-injury were assessed. RESULTS: Aggregated into 1 group, TGAs had higher odds of all outcomes as compared with CGAs. Within TGA subgroups, transgender males and transgender females had higher odds of suicidal ideation and attempt than CGA groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we used comprehensive measures of gender assigned at birth and current gender identity within a large nationwide survey of adolescents in the United States to examine suicidality among TGAs and CGAs. TGAs had higher odds of all suicidality outcomes, and transgender males and transgender females had high risk for suicidal ideation and attempt. Authors of future adolescent suicidality research must assess both gender assigned at birth and current gender identity to accurately identify and categorize TGAs.
Authors: Sari L Reisner; Tonia Poteat; JoAnne Keatley; Mauro Cabral; Tampose Mothopeng; Emilia Dunham; Claire E Holland; Ryan Max; Stefan D Baral Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael P Marshal; Laura J Dietz; Mark S Friedman; Ron Stall; Helen A Smith; James McGinley; Brian C Thoma; Pamela J Murray; Anthony R D'Augelli; David A Brent Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Matthew K Nock; Jennifer Greif Green; Irving Hwang; Katie A McLaughlin; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Jessica C Levenson; Brian C Thoma; Jessica L Hamilton; Sophia Choukas-Bradley; Rachel H Salk Journal: Sleep Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Nastasja M de Graaf; Thomas D Steensma; Polly Carmichael; Doug P VanderLaan; Madison Aitken; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Annelou L C de Vries; Baudewijntje P C Kreukels; Lori Wasserman; Hayley Wood; Kenneth J Zucker Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Anna Valentine; Natalie Nokoff; Andrea Bonny; Gayathri Chelvakumar; Justin Indyk; Scott Leibowitz; Leena Nahata Journal: Transgend Health Date: 2021-12-02
Authors: Brian Mustanski; Sarah W Whitton; Michael E Newcomb; Antonia Clifford; Daniel T Ryan; Robert D Gibbons Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2021-03
Authors: Rachita Sood; Diane Chen; Abigail L Muldoon; Liqi Chen; Mary J Kwasny; Lisa K Simons; Noopur Gangopadhyay; Julia F Corcoran; Sumanas W Jordan Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Jacqueline Nesi; Taylor A Burke; Hannah R Lawrence; Heather A MacPherson; Anthony Spirito; Jennifer C Wolff Journal: Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Taylor A Burke; Alexandra H Bettis; Sierra C Barnicle; Shirley B Wang; Kathryn R Fox Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Anastacia Y Kudinova; Alexandra H Bettis; Elizabeth C Thompson; Sarah A Thomas; Jacqueline Nesi; Leyla Erguder; Heather A MacPherson; Taylor A Burke; Jennifer C Wolff Journal: Child Youth Care Forum Date: 2021-07-19