Yoriaki Matsumoto1,2, Takanori Masuda1,2, Tomoyasu Sato3, Keiko Arataki4, Yuko Nakamura2, Fuminari Tatsugami2, Kazuo Awai2. 1. From the Department of Radiological Technology, Tsuchiya General Hospital. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University. 3. Department of Radiology, Tsuchiya General Hospital. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Tsuchiya General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare enhancement of the aorta and liver on hepatic dynamic computed tomography scans acquired with contrast material doses based on the lean body weight (LBW) or the total body weight (TBW). METHODS: We randomly divided 529 patients (279 men, 250 women; median age, 66 years) scheduled for hepatic dynamic computed tomography into 2 groups. The LBW patients (n = 278) were injected with 679 mg iodine/kg (men) or 762 mg iodine/kg (women). The TBW group (n = 251) was injected with 600 mg iodine/kg TBW. Each group was subdivided into the 3 classes based on the body mass index (BMI; low, normal, high). Aortic enhancement during the hepatic arterial phase and hepatic enhancement during the portal venous phase was compared. The aortic and hepatic equivalence margins were 100 and 20 Hounsfield units, respectively. RESULTS: Comparison of the median iodine dose in patients with a normal or high BMI showed that it was significantly lower under the LBW protocol than the TBW protocol (558.2 and 507.0 mg iodine/kg, P < 0.001, respectively). However, in patients with a low BMI, the LBW protocol delivered a significantly higher dose than the TBW protocol (620.7 vs 600.0 mg iodine/kg, P < 0.001). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in aortic and hepatic enhancement between the 2 protocols was within the range of the predetermined equivalence margins in all BMI subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhancement was equivalent under both protocols. The LBW protocol can avoid iodine overdosing, especially in patients with a high BMI.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare enhancement of the aorta and liver on hepatic dynamic computed tomography scans acquired with contrast material doses based on the lean body weight (LBW) or the total body weight (TBW). METHODS: We randomly divided 529 patients (279 men, 250 women; median age, 66 years) scheduled for hepatic dynamic computed tomography into 2 groups. The LBW patients (n = 278) were injected with 679 mg iodine/kg (men) or 762 mg iodine/kg (women). The TBW group (n = 251) was injected with 600 mg iodine/kg TBW. Each group was subdivided into the 3 classes based on the body mass index (BMI; low, normal, high). Aortic enhancement during the hepatic arterial phase and hepatic enhancement during the portal venous phase was compared. The aortic and hepatic equivalence margins were 100 and 20 Hounsfield units, respectively. RESULTS: Comparison of the median iodine dose in patients with a normal or high BMI showed that it was significantly lower under the LBW protocol than the TBW protocol (558.2 and 507.0 mg iodine/kg, P < 0.001, respectively). However, in patients with a low BMI, the LBW protocol delivered a significantly higher dose than the TBW protocol (620.7 vs 600.0 mg iodine/kg, P < 0.001). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in aortic and hepatic enhancement between the 2 protocols was within the range of the predetermined equivalence margins in all BMI subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhancement was equivalent under both protocols. The LBW protocol can avoid iodineoverdosing, especially in patients with a high BMI.