Bryn M Smith1, Meghan J Lyle1, Alex C Chen1, Carol H Miao1,2. 1. Center for Immunity and Immunotherapies, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following protein replacement therapy, one-third of severe hemophilia A patients develop antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII), which also hinders the efficacy of gene therapy. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a naturally suppressive function that potentially reduces the immune response to FVIII therapy. Furthermore, antigen-specific Tregs are functionally much more potent than polyclonal cells. Adoptive transfer of antigen-specific Tregs can effectively suppress anti-FVIII antibody responses. OBJECTIVE: Develop a clinically feasible protocol to enrich and expand Tregs specific to FVIII for suppressing anti-FVIII immune responses. METHODS: Regulatory T cells are isolated from FVIII-sensitized mice, sorted on CD25high markers, and expanded specifically with FVIII, antigen-presenting cells, and interleukin 2 (IL 2). Subsequently, Tregs are further cultured with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads, anti-Crry antibodies, and IL 2 to achieve 10-fold to 20-fold expansion. Expanded Tregs are characterized and tested for their suppressive activity in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: In vitro FVIII-specific suppressive assays indicate that FVIII specifically expanded Tregs are more suppressive than non-specifically expanded and naive Tregs. Adoptive transfer of expanded Tregs into HemA mice showed that FVIII-specifically expanded Tregs are significantly more potent in suppressing anti-FVIII immune responses in FVIII plasmid-treated HemA mice. Moreover, the FVIII-specific immune tolerance is maintained after a secondary challenge with FVIII plasmid. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the FVIII-specific sensitization and expansion protocol yields more potent Tregs to suppress anti-FVIII antibody responses and induce long-term tolerance to FVIII, increasing the potential for adoptive Treg cell therapy to modulate anti-FVIII immune responses.
BACKGROUND: Following protein replacement therapy, one-third of severe hemophilia Apatients develop antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII), which also hinders the efficacy of gene therapy. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a naturally suppressive function that potentially reduces the immune response to FVIII therapy. Furthermore, antigen-specific Tregs are functionally much more potent than polyclonal cells. Adoptive transfer of antigen-specific Tregs can effectively suppress anti-FVIII antibody responses. OBJECTIVE: Develop a clinically feasible protocol to enrich and expand Tregs specific to FVIII for suppressing anti-FVIII immune responses. METHODS: Regulatory T cells are isolated from FVIII-sensitized mice, sorted on CD25high markers, and expanded specifically with FVIII, antigen-presenting cells, and interleukin 2 (IL 2). Subsequently, Tregs are further cultured with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads, anti-Crry antibodies, and IL 2 to achieve 10-fold to 20-fold expansion. Expanded Tregs are characterized and tested for their suppressive activity in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: In vitro FVIII-specific suppressive assays indicate that FVIII specifically expanded Tregs are more suppressive than non-specifically expanded and naive Tregs. Adoptive transfer of expanded Tregs into HemA mice showed that FVIII-specifically expanded Tregs are significantly more potent in suppressing anti-FVIII immune responses in FVIII plasmid-treated HemA mice. Moreover, the FVIII-specific immune tolerance is maintained after a secondary challenge with FVIII plasmid. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the FVIII-specific sensitization and expansion protocol yields more potent Tregs to suppress anti-FVIII antibody responses and induce long-term tolerance to FVIII, increasing the potential for adoptive Treg cell therapy to modulate anti-FVIII immune responses.
Authors: Petra Bacher; Frederik Heinrich; Ulrik Stervbo; Mikalai Nienen; Marco Vahldieck; Christina Iwert; Katrin Vogt; Jutta Kollet; Nina Babel; Birgit Sawitzki; Carsten Schwarz; Stefan Bereswill; Markus M Heimesaat; Guido Heine; Gabriele Gadermaier; Claudia Asam; Mario Assenmacher; Olaf Kniemeyer; Axel A Brakhage; Fátima Ferreira; Michael Wallner; Margitta Worm; Alexander Scheffold Journal: Cell Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jeffrey A Bluestone; Jane H Buckner; Mark Fitch; Stephen E Gitelman; Shipra Gupta; Marc K Hellerstein; Kevan C Herold; Angela Lares; Michael R Lee; Kelvin Li; Weihong Liu; S Alice Long; Lisa M Masiello; Vinh Nguyen; Amy L Putnam; Mary Rieck; Peter H Sayre; Qizhi Tang Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Benjamin M Matta; Dawn K Reichenbach; Xiaoli Zhang; Lisa Mathews; Brent H Koehn; Gaelen K Dwyer; Jeremy M Lott; Franziska M Uhl; Dietmar Pfeifer; Colby J Feser; Michelle J Smith; Quan Liu; Robert Zeiser; Bruce R Blazar; Hēth R Turnquist Journal: Blood Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Richard Y Fu; Alex C Chen; Meghan J Lyle; Chun-Yu Chen; Chao Lien Liu; Carol H Miao Journal: Cell Immunol Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 4.868
Authors: Sebastien Lacroix-Desmazes; Jan Voorberg; David Lillicrap; David W Scott; Kathleen P Pratt Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 7.561