Literature DB >> 31607538

Flies Regulate Wing Motion via Active Control of a Dual-Function Gyroscope.

Bradley H Dickerson1, Alysha M de Souza1, Ainul Huda1, Michael H Dickinson2.   

Abstract

Flies execute their remarkable aerial maneuvers using a set of wing steering muscles, which are activated at specific phases of the stroke cycle [1-3]. The activation phase of these muscles-which determines their biomechanical output [4-6]-arises via feedback from mechanoreceptors at the base of the wings and structures unique to flies called halteres [7-9]. Evolved from the hindwings, the tiny halteres oscillate at the same frequency as the wings, although they serve no aerodynamic function [10] and are thought to act as gyroscopes [10-15]. Like the wings, halteres possess minute control muscles whose activity is modified by descending visual input [16], raising the possibility that flies control wing motion by adjusting the motor output of their halteres, although this hypothesis has never been directly tested. Here, using genetic techniques possible in Drosophila melanogaster, we tested the hypothesis that visual input during flight modulates haltere muscle activity and that this, in turn, alters the mechanosensory feedback that regulates the wing steering muscles. Our results suggest that rather than acting solely as a gyroscope to detect body rotation, halteres also function as an adjustable clock to set the spike timing of wing motor neurons, a specialized capability that evolved from the generic flight circuitry of their four-winged ancestors. In addition to demonstrating how the efferent control loop of a sensory structure regulates wing motion, our results provide insight into the selective scenario that gave rise to the evolution of halteres.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; flight control; haltere; muscles

Year:  2019        PMID: 31607538     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

Review 1.  The two-body problem: Proprioception and motor control across the metamorphic divide.

Authors:  Sweta Agrawal; John C Tuthill
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 7.070

2.  Takeoff diversity in Diptera.

Authors:  Alexandra M Yarger; Katherine A Jordan; Alexa J Smith; Jessica L Fox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Haltere and visual inputs sum linearly to predict wing (but not gaze) motor output in tethered flying Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael J Rauscher; Jessica L Fox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Rapid frequency modulation in a resonant system: aerial perturbation recovery in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Ryan Gemilere; Lds-Vip Fm Subteam; James Lynch; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Reconstruction of motor control circuits in adult Drosophila using automated transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Jasper S Phelps; David Grant Colburn Hildebrand; Brett J Graham; Aaron T Kuan; Logan A Thomas; Tri M Nguyen; Julia Buhmann; Anthony W Azevedo; Anne Sustar; Sweta Agrawal; Mingguan Liu; Brendan L Shanny; Jan Funke; John C Tuthill; Wei-Chung Allen Lee
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 66.850

6.  The Balance Hypothesis for the Avian Lumbosacral Organ and an Exploration of Its Morphological Variation.

Authors:  K E Stanchak; C French; D J Perkel; B W Brunton
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-08-12

7.  Wings and halteres act as coupled dual oscillators in flies.

Authors:  Tanvi Deora; Siddharth S Sane; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Chasing Flies: The Use of Wingbeat Frequency as a Communication Cue in Calyptrate Flies (Diptera: Calyptratae).

Authors:  Julie Pinto; Paola A Magni; R Christopher O'Brien; Ian R Dadour
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Cell-type-specific Hox regulatory strategies orchestrate tissue identity.

Authors:  Ryan Loker; Jordyn E Sanner; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 10.900

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.