Literature DB >> 31605400

Fitness consequences of the selfish supergene Segregation Distorter.

Heidi W S Wong1, Luke Holman1.   

Abstract

Segregation distorters are selfish genetic elements that subvert Mendelian inheritance, often by destroying gametes that do not carry the distorter. Simple theoretical models predict that distorter alleles will either spread to fixation or stabilize at some high intermediate frequency. However, many distorters have substantially lower allele frequencies than predicted by simple models, suggesting that key sources of selection remain to be discovered. Here, we measured the fitness of Drosophila melanogaster adults and juveniles carrying zero, one or two copies of three different variants of the naturally occurring supergene Segregation Distorter (SD), in order to investigate why SD alleles remain relatively rare within populations despite being preferentially inherited. First, we show that the three SD variants differ in the severity and dominance of the fitness costs they impose on individuals carrying them. Second, SD-carrying parents produced less fit offspring in some crosses, independent of offspring genotype, indicating that SD alleles can have nongenetic, transgenerational costs in addition to their direct costs. Third, we found that SD carriers sometimes produce a biased offspring sex ratio, perhaps due to off-target effects of SD on the sex chromosomes. Finally, we used a theoretical model to investigate how sex ratio and transgenerational effects alter the population genetics of distorter alleles; accounting for these additional costs helps to explain why real-world segregation distorter alleles are rarer than predicted.
© 2019 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2019 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gene drive; meiotic drive; population genetic model; selfish genes; t paradox

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31605400     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  5 in total

1.  Maternal effect killing by a supergene controlling ant social organization.

Authors:  Amaury Avril; Jessica Purcell; Sébastien Béniguel; Michel Chapuisat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fitness consequences of a non-recombining sex-ratio drive chromosome can explain its prevalence in the wild.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; David W Hall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Unbalanced selection: the challenge of maintaining a social polymorphism when a supergene is selfish.

Authors:  Alireza G Tafreshi; Sarah P Otto; Michel Chapuisat
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function.

Authors:  Emma L Berdan; Thomas Flatt; Genevieve M Kozak; Katie E Lotterhos; Ben Wielstra
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Sexual selection can partly explain low frequencies of Segregation Distorter alleles.

Authors:  Thomas A Keaney; Therésa M Jones; Luke Holman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.