Literature DB >> 31605037

The future of clinical trials in urological oncology.

Vikram M Narayan1,2, Philipp Dahm3.   

Abstract

Well-designed clinical trials in urological oncology help to guide treatment decisions and aid in counselling patients, ultimately serving to improve outcomes. Since the term evidence-based medicine was first used by Gordon Guyatt in 1991, a renewed emphasis on methodology, transparent trial design and study reporting has helped to improve clinical research and in turn, the landscape of medical literature. Novel clinical trial designs (including multi-arm, multistage trials, basket and umbrella studies and research from big data sources, such as electronic health records, administrative claims databases and quality monitoring registries) are well suited to advance innovation in urological oncology. Existing urological clinical trials are often limited by small numbers, are statistically underpowered and many face difficulties with accrual. Thus, efforts to improve trial design are of considerable importance. The development and use of standard outcome sets and adherence to reporting guidelines offer researchers the opportunity to guide value-oriented care, minimize research waste and efficiently identify solutions to the unanswered questions in urology cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31605037     DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0243-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  60 in total

1.  A Randomized Trial Testing US Food and Drug Administration "Breakthrough" Language.

Authors:  Tamar Krishnamurti; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Adaptive, group sequential and decision theoretic approaches to sample size determination.

Authors:  Cyrus R Mehta; Nitin R Patel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts.

Authors:  Frank Bretz; Heinz Schmidli; Franz König; Amy Racine; Willi Maurer
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 4.  Sample size re-estimation in clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael A Proschan
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  The STAMPEDE trial: paradigm-changing data through innovative trial design.

Authors:  Bradley C Carthon; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology perspective: Raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes.

Authors:  Lee M Ellis; David S Bernstein; Emile E Voest; Jordan D Berlin; Daniel Sargent; Patricia Cortazar; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Roy S Herbst; Rogerio C Lilenbaum; Camelia Sima; Alan P Venook; Mithat Gonen; Richard L Schilsky; Neal J Meropol; Lowell E Schnipper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Regulatory Watch: Impact of breakthrough therapy designation on cancer drug development.

Authors:  Michael Shea; Linda Ostermann; Ryan Hohman; Samantha Roberts; Marina Kozak; Ryan Dull; Jeff Allen; Ellen Sigal
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  Efficacy, Safety, and Regulatory Approval of Food and Drug Administration-Designated Breakthrough and Nonbreakthrough Cancer Medicines.

Authors:  Thomas J Hwang; Jessica M Franklin; Christopher T Chen; Julie C Lauffenburger; Bishal Gyawali; Aaron S Kesselheim; Jonathan J Darrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Speeding up the evaluation of new agents in cancer.

Authors:  Mahesh K B Parmar; Friederike M-S Barthel; Matthew Sydes; Ruth Langley; Rick Kaplan; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Mark Brady; Nicholas James; Michael A Bookman; Ann-Marie Swart; Wendi Qian; Patrick Royston
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is There Still a Debate?

Authors:  Roser Vives Dilme; Juan Gómez Rivas; Riccardo Campi; Javier Puente; Tamara Jerez; Dmitry Enikeev; Francesco Esperto; Jesús Moreno Sierra
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Competitive glucose metabolism as a target to boost bladder cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Julieta Afonso; Lúcio L Santos; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Fátima Baltazar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Stability and anti-proliferative properties of biologically active compounds extracted from Cistus L. after sterilization treatments.

Authors:  Mario Ammendola; Monika Haponska; Karolina Balik; Paulina Modrakowska; Karolina Matulewicz; Lukasz Kazmierski; Aleksandra Lis; Justyna Kozlowska; Ricard Garcia-Valls; Marta Giamberini; Anna Bajek; Bartosz Tylkowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.