Yiwen Cao1, Angelina S Carrillo1, Shu-Hong Zhu1, Yuyan Shi2. 1. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. 2. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: yus001@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: After marijuana commercialization, the presence of recreational marijuana dispensaries (RMDs) was rapidly increasing. The point-of-sale marketing poses concerns about children's exposure. This study examined advertising and promotions that potentially appeal to children and access restrictions in RMDs around California schools. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and observational study conducted from June to September 2018. Trained fieldworkers audited retail environments in 163 RMDs in closest proximity to 333 randomly sampled public schools in California. RESULTS: About 44% of schools had RMDs located within 3 miles. Regarding interior marketing, 74% of RMDs had at least one instance of child-appealing products, packages, paraphernalia, or advertisements. RMDs closer to a school had a higher proportion with interior child-appealing marketing. More than three fourths of RMDs had generic promotional activities; particularly, 28% violated the free-sample ban. Regarding exterior marketing, only 2% of RMDs had those appealing to children. More than 60% of RMDs had exterior signs indicative of marijuana. Approximately, one-third had generic advertisements, and 13% had advertisements bigger than 1,600 square inches. Regarding access restrictions, almost all RMDs complied with age verification, but 84% had no age limit signs, and only 40% had security personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Despite minimal point-of-sale marketing practices appealing to children on the exterior of RMDs around California schools, such practices were abundant on the interior. Marketing practices not specifically appealing to children were also common on both the interior and exterior of RMDs. Dispensaries' violation of age verification law, lack of security personnel, and presence of child-appealing marketing should be continuously monitored and prevented.
PURPOSE: After marijuana commercialization, the presence of recreational marijuana dispensaries (RMDs) was rapidly increasing. The point-of-sale marketing poses concerns about children's exposure. This study examined advertising and promotions that potentially appeal to children and access restrictions in RMDs around California schools. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and observational study conducted from June to September 2018. Trained fieldworkers audited retail environments in 163 RMDs in closest proximity to 333 randomly sampled public schools in California. RESULTS: About 44% of schools had RMDs located within 3 miles. Regarding interior marketing, 74% of RMDs had at least one instance of child-appealing products, packages, paraphernalia, or advertisements. RMDs closer to a school had a higher proportion with interior child-appealing marketing. More than three fourths of RMDs had generic promotional activities; particularly, 28% violated the free-sample ban. Regarding exterior marketing, only 2% of RMDs had those appealing to children. More than 60% of RMDs had exterior signs indicative of marijuana. Approximately, one-third had generic advertisements, and 13% had advertisements bigger than 1,600 square inches. Regarding access restrictions, almost all RMDs complied with age verification, but 84% had no age limit signs, and only 40% had security personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Despite minimal point-of-sale marketing practices appealing to children on the exterior of RMDs around California schools, such practices were abundant on the interior. Marketing practices not specifically appealing to children were also common on both the interior and exterior of RMDs. Dispensaries' violation of age verification law, lack of security personnel, and presence of child-appealing marketing should be continuously monitored and prevented.
Authors: Charles King; Michael Siegel; David H Jernigan; Laura Wulach; Craig Ross; Karen Dixon; Joshua Ostroff Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Eunyoung Y Song; Jessica L King; Kathleen L Egan; Beata Debinski; Mark Wolfson; John Spangler; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Martine Stead; Crawford Moodie; Kathryn Angus; Linda Bauld; Ann McNeill; James Thomas; Gerard Hastings; Kate Hinds; Alison O'Mara-Eves; Irene Kwan; Richard I Purves; Stuart L Bryce Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Annemarie R Kelleghan; Michael J Sofis; Alan Budney; Rachel Ceasar; Adam M Leventhal Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 4.852