Literature DB >> 31602572

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Young Ho Lee1, Gwan Gyu Song2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Peficitinib, a JAK3-selective inhibitor that blocks the signal transduction and then suppresses immune responses, has been developed for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We assessed the relative efficacy and safety of once-daily administration of peficitinib (a JAK3-selective inhibitor) 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg in patients with active RA.
METHODS: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to combine direct and indirect evidence from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The literature search was performed up to May 2019 using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.
RESULTS: Three RCTs involving 948 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were ten pairwise comparisons, including five direct comparisons and five interventions. The American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate was significantly higher in the peficitinib 150-mg group than in the placebo group (odds ratio (OR): 3.61; 95% credible interval (CrI): 2.35-5.57). Similarly, the ACR20 response rate was significantly higher in the peficitinib 100-mg group than in the placebo group (OR: 2.33, 95% CrI: 1.51-3.56). The peficitinib 50-mg group had a significantly higher ACR20 response rate than the placebo group. However, the ACR20 response rate was not significantly higher in the peficitinib 25-mg group than in the placebo group. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that peficitinib 150 mg was likely to achieve the best ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.995), followed by peficitinib 100 mg (SUCRA = 0.696), peficitinib 50 mg (SUCRA = 0.558), peficitinib 25 mg (SUCRA = 0.153), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.098). The ACR50 and ACR70 response rates showed a similar distribution pattern to the ACR20 response rate. The difference in the number of patients with adverse events (AEs) among the intervention groups was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Peficitinib 50, 100, and 150 mg once daily was effective in treating active RA, without causing a significant risk for AEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31602572     DOI: 10.1007/s40261-019-00863-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  24 in total

Review 1.  JAK-STAT signaling: from interferons to cytokines.

Authors:  Christian Schindler; David E Levy; Thomas Decker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M C Hochberg; R W Chang; I Dwosh; S Lindsey; T Pincus; F Wolfe
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-05

3.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

4.  Peficitinib, a JAK Inhibitor, in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate.

Authors:  A J Kivitz; S R Gutierrez-Ureña; J Poiley; M C Genovese; R Kristy; K Shay; X Wang; J P Garg; A Zubrzycka-Sienkiewicz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 5.  Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases.

Authors:  Robert Roskoski
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 6.  Rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha; Iain B McInnes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Peficitinib, a JAK Inhibitor, in Combination With Limited Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Mark C Genovese; Maria Greenwald; Christine Codding; Anna Zubrzycka-Sienkiewicz; Alan J Kivitz; Annie Wang; Kathyjo Shay; Xuegong Wang; Jay P Garg; Mario H Cardiel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 10.995

8.  Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.

Authors:  J P T Higgins; D Jackson; J K Barrett; G Lu; A E Ades; I R White
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.273

9.  Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sofia Dias; Nicky J Welton; Alex J Sutton; Deborah M Caldwell; Guobing Lu; A E Ades
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Essential biphasic role for JAK3 catalytic activity in IL-2 receptor signaling.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Smith; Kenji Uchida; Arthur Weiss; Jack Taunton
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 15.040

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib Versus Tofacitinib and Baricitinib for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yoshiya Tanaka; Hiroyuki Okumura; Soyoung Kim; Julie Dorey; Piotr Wojciechowski; Justyna Chorąży; Daisuke Kato; Neil M Schultz
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-03-16

2.  The optimal dosage of pefcitinib for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: A protocol for an updated network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuyi Zhou; Chunfang Sun; Chunyan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.