Geoffrey A Smith1,2, Kenji Uchida1, Arthur Weiss2,3, Jack Taunton1. 1. Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Rosalind Russell and Ephraim P. Engleman Arthritis Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
To drive lymphocyte proliferation and differentiation, common γ-chain (γc) cytokine receptors require hours to days of sustained stimulation. JAK1 and JAK3 kinases are found together in all γc-receptor complexes, but how their respective catalytic activities contribute to signaling over time is not known. Here we dissect the temporal requirements for JAK3 kinase activity with a selective covalent inhibitor (JAK3i). By monitoring phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT5 over 20 h in CD4(+) T cells stimulated with interleukin 2 (IL-2), we document a second wave of signaling that is much more sensitive to JAK3i than the first wave. Selective inhibition of this second wave is sufficient to block cyclin expression and entry to S phase. An inhibitor-resistant JAK3 mutant (C905S) rescued all effects of JAK3i in isolated T cells and in mice. Our chemical genetic toolkit elucidates a biphasic requirement for JAK3 kinase activity in IL-2-driven T cell proliferation and will find broad utility in studies of γc-receptor signaling.
To drive lymphocyte proliferation and differentiation, common γ-chain (γc) cytokine receptors require hours to days of sustained stimulation. JAK1 and JAK3 kinases are found together in all γc-receptor complexes, but how their respective catalytic activities contribute to signaling over time is not known. Here we dissect the temporal requirements for JAK3 kinase activity with a selective covalent inhibitor (JAK3i). By monitoring phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT5 over 20 h in CD4(+) T cells stimulated with interleukin 2 (IL-2), we document a second wave of signaling that is much more sensitive to JAK3i than the first wave. Selective inhibition of this second wave is sufficient to block cyclin expression and entry to S phase. An inhibitor-resistant JAK3 mutant (C905S) rescued all effects of JAK3i in isolated T cells and in mice. Our chemical genetic toolkit elucidates a biphasic requirement for JAK3 kinase activity in IL-2-driven T cell proliferation and will find broad utility in studies of γc-receptor signaling.
The common gamma chain (γc) receptor cytokines (IL-2, 4,
7, 9, 15 and 21) are essential for lymphocyte development, survival, differentiation
and proliferation[1]. All six of
these cytokines signal by engaging a receptor complex comprising the common gamma
chain (IL-2Rγ, CD132) and one or two additional chains. These receptors have
no intrinsic kinase activity. Hence, the tightly associated cytoplasmic kinases,
JAK1 (bound to IL-2Rβ and others) and JAK3 (bound to
IL-2Rγ)[2], are
required for signal transduction and are clinically validated targets for the
treatment of autoimmune diseases[1,3]. In the prototypical case of IL-2,
ligand binding rapidly triggers the phosphorylation of 3 tyrosines within the
IL-2Rβ cytoplasmic tail (Y341, Y395, Y498) and the subsequent recruitment,
phosphorylation, and activation of the transcription factor STAT5. In addition, IL-2
receptor ligation activates the PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathways via the recruited
adapter protein Shc[4]. Genetic
studies indicate that among these downstream signaling events, STAT5 activation is
especially critical, enabling full lymphocyte expansion in vitro
and in vivo as well as immune regulation by CD4+ regulatory
T-cells[5-8].Loss of JAK3 in mice and humans results in severely compromised T-cell
function[9,10]. Nevertheless, the requirement for JAK3
kinase activity downstream of IL-2R and other γc cytokine
receptors remains controversial. Critical tyrosines on IL-2Rβ and STAT5 are
likely phosphorylated by JAK1 and/or JAK3, but none of these phosphorylation events
have been uniquely attributed to either kinase[11]. Interestingly, a recent study concluded that JAK1 kinase
activity is necessary and sufficient for IL-2-stimulated STAT5 phosphorylation,
whereas JAK3 kinase activity is dispensable[12]. Instead, JAK3 was proposed to play an essential
scaffolding role. These conclusions were based primarily on experiments in cell
lines expressing combinations of kinase-dead and analog-sensitive JAK1/3 mutants.
Moreover, and of particular relevance to the work presented here, signaling events
were only followed for one hour after IL-2 stimulation.The temporal requirements for JAK3 kinase activity in driving
cytokine-induced cell proliferation are completely unknown. Is a transient pulse of
JAK3 activity sufficient to drive quiescent T cells into S-phase (DNA synthesis), or
is sustained JAK3 signaling required? As is true for other γc
cytokine-driven processes[13-16], T-cell
proliferation requires at least 6 hours of continuous exposure to IL-2[17]. Yet, receptor-proximal signaling
events (e.g., IL-2Rβ and STAT5 phosphorylation) are most often assessed at
early time points (< 1 hr) after receptor stimulation. The relative
contributions of JAK1 and JAK3 kinase activity to cell proliferation, and how they
evolve over time, is a central unanswered question in JAK-STAT signaling.To define the temporal requirements for JAK3 kinase activity in a manner not
achievable with genetic knockout approaches, we employed a highly selective
inhibitor, JAK3i. Like other recently reported JAK3-selective inhibitors[18-20], JAK3i forms a covalent bond with a cysteine found in JAK3,
but not the closely related kinase domains in JAK1, JAK2, or TYK2. We exploited the
nonessential nature of this cysteine to generate an inhibitor-resistant JAK3 mutant
(Cys905Ser). This combined chemical and genetic toolkit revealed new insights into
JAK3 signaling requirements in the context of IL-2-stimulated primary CD4+ T
cells. Contrary to the report described above[12], we find that JAK3 kinase activity is absolutely essential
for STAT5 phosphorylation. Through detailed time-course experiments, we characterize
a previously unreported second wave of STAT5 phosphorylation that is sustained for
at least 10 hours after IL-2 addition. This second, more prolonged wave of signaling
is exquisitely sensitive to JAK3 inhibition and is essential for T-cell
proliferation. Finally, we demonstrate that JAK3i abolishes IL-2-driven T-cell
proliferation in mice, a phenotype that is completely rescued by C905S JAK3.
Results
JAK3i is selective for JAK3 over closely related kinases
To dissect the role of JAK3 in γc-receptor signaling,
we sought a highly selective chemical probe that would allow us to study
signaling with temporal control and without perturbing lymphocyte development.
However, the discovery of JAK3-selective inhibitors has proven challenging due
to the nearly identical ATP binding sites shared between all JAK-family kinase
domains[21]. Although we
recently identified reversible covalent JAK3 inhibitors with selectivity over
other JAK-family kinases by targeting a cysteine unique to JAK3 (Supplementary Results,
Supplementary Fig.
1)[18], these
compounds were not sufficiently potent for cellular studies and lacked
selectivity toward other cysteine-containing kinases such as ITK, a critical
T-cell kinase[22]. As an
alternative, we identified a series of acrylamide-containing pyrrolopyrimidines,
exemplified by JAK3i (1, Fig.
1), in a patent application[23]. Although compounds related to JAK3i were reported to
inhibit JAK3 with subnanomolar potency in biochemical assays, no data were
provided on the activity of these compounds in cells or animals.
Figure 1
Chemical Structure of JAK3i.
JAK3i was highly selective in biochemical kinase assays, with
>3,000-fold selectivity for JAK3 over the closely related kinases JAK1,
JAK2, and TYK2 (Supplementary
Table 1). In addition to JAK3, 9 other kinases share a structurally
equivalent cysteine. They include the TEC-family kinases, which play an
important role in antigen receptor signaling[22]. When tested against a small panel of these kinases in
the presence of physiological ATP, JAK3i was also highly selective for JAK3:
1,300-fold vs. EGFR, 600-fold vs. ITK and 50-fold vs. BTK (Supplementary Table
2).
The high selectivity of JAK3i within the JAK family enabled us to
elucidate the specific requirements for JAK3 catalytic activity in
γc-receptor signaling. For these experiments, we isolated
primary murine CD4+ T cells and activated them via plate-bound
αCD3 and αCD28 to induce expression of the high-affinity IL-2
receptor. We then monitored IL-2-stimulated STAT5 phosphorylation by FACS.
Contrary to an earlier chemical genetic study[12], we found that JAK3 kinase activity was
absolutely required for STAT5 phosphorylation (pSTAT5) after 15 minutes of IL-2
stimulation (IC50 47 nM, Fig.
2a). Our finding is consistent with a recently published report in which
a structurally distinct, irreversible JAK3 inhibitor was found to block STAT5
phosphorylation at early time points[19]. The effect of JAK3-selective inhibitors on later
IL-2-driven signaling events has not been reported and is the primary focus of
our study.
Figure 2
Early and late signaling events are differentially affected by JAK3i
CD4+ T-cell blasts were pretreated for 2 hrs with indicated dose of JAK3i
(a–b, e) or tofacitinib (c–d) and stimulated with IL-2 (50
u/mL). (a & c) STAT5 phosphorylation was monitored by phosphoflow 15 min
after IL-2 stimulation. (c & d) Dose-response curves comparing effects
on pSTAT5, proliferation, and CD25 upregulation. Proliferation was assessed by
3H-thymidine uptake after 24–48 hrs. CD25
(IL-2Rα) upregulation was quantified by FACS after 24 hrs (see Supplementary Fig. 2a for
FACS histograms). e) S6 phosphorylation (Ser240/244) was monitored by
phosphoflow in parallel with pSTAT5 after 15 minutes of IL-2 stimulation. See
Supplementary Fig.
4c for corresponding pSTAT5 histograms. Data in a,c & e are
representative of 5, 8 and 2 independent experiments. Data in b are cumulative
of 6 (proliferation) and 4 (pSTAT5 & CD25) independent experiments,
plotted as mean ± SEM. Data in c are cumulative of 3 (proliferation), 7
(pSTAT5) and 5 (CD25) independent experiments, plotted as mean ± SEM.
See Supplementary Table
3 for average IC50 values from all experiments.
To our surprise, three downstream readouts of IL-2 signaling, all
measured at 24–48 hours after stimulation, were much more sensitive to
JAK3i (IC50 3–7 nM), with significant inhibition occurring at
concentrations that had no effect on pSTAT5: (1) upregulation of IL-2Rα
(CD25) at 24 hours (IC50 3.1 nM, Supplementary Fig. 2a and Fig.
2b); (2) proliferation, quantified by 3H-thymidine uptake
from 24–48 hours (IC50 3.7 nM, Fig. 2b); (3) IFN-γ production at 24 hours (IC50
6.8 nM, Supplementary Fig.
2b). This disconnect between early and late signaling readouts was
less pronounced with the pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib[21]. Rather, tofacitinib’s
concentration-dependent effects on early pSTAT5 more closely mirrored its
effects on CD25 upregulation, T-cell proliferation, and IFN-γ production
(Fig. 2c–d and Supplementary Fig.
2a–b), as expected given that all three processes require
STAT5-mediated transcription. Thus, in contrast to tofacitinib, a JAK3-selective
inhibitor can prevent critical STAT5-dependent processes (e.g., T-cell
proliferation) in the absence of any effect on early STAT5 phosphorylation. This
suggests that the requirements for JAK3 (and possibly, JAK1) catalytic activity
change over time, a possibility we address in greater detail below.The apparent disconnect between JAK3i effects on early pSTAT5 and
downstream readouts could potentially be explained by inhibition of MEK/ERK or
PI3K/mTOR pathways, both of which are canonically activated by IL-2[4]. In our primary CD4+
T-cell blasts, we detected very little phospho-ERK (Supplementary Fig. 3a),
and MEK/ERK signaling was dispensable for proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 3b).
By contrast, inhibition of PI3K, AKT or mTOR was sufficient to abolish
IL-2-stimulated proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 4a), consistent with prior studies in human
T-cell lines[24]. Upon
stimulation with IL-2 for 15 minutes, we consistently detected a small induction
of phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (a p70S6K substrate and proxy for PI3K
and mTOR signaling[25]) by
phosphoflow (Supplementary
Fig. 4b). This induction was blocked by JAK3i, but with an equivalent
IC50 to pSTAT5 (Fig. 2e),
suggesting that these two processes have similar requirements for JAK3 catalytic
activity.
C905S JAK3 mutant rescues JAK3i effects
Before pursuing additional mechanistic studies, we sought to ensure that
all phenotypes induced by JAK3i were indeed the result of JAK3 kinase
inhibition. We established this through multiple independent approaches.
Compound 2, which lacks cysteine reactivity but is otherwise
structurally identical to JAK3i, is >200-fold less potent in all
biochemical and cellular assays (Supplementary Fig. 5). To address the possibility that
JAK3i acts by targeting an alternative cysteine-containing kinase (e.g., ITK or
RLK, both expressed in T cells) or any other protein besides JAK3, we
retrovirally overexpressed a JAK3 mutant lacking the key cysteine (C905S) (Supplementary Fig. 6a).
Relative to the empty vector, overexpression of wild-type JAK3 in mouse
CD4+ T-cell blasts caused a slight reduction in JAK3i sensitivity in the
IL-2 proliferation assay (IC50 23 nM, Fig. 3a), consistent with the large increase in cellular JAK3 levels
(Supplementary Fig.
6b). In contrast to WT JAK3, overexpression of C905S JAK3 completely
prevented JAK3i effects on T-cell proliferation at relevant concentrations,
resulting in an apparent 1,000-fold shift in potency (IC50 >
4,000 nM). STAT5 phosphorylation and CD25 upregulation were similarly rescued by
C905S JAK3 (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 6c).
These genetic perturbations had no effect on tofacitinib sensitivity (Supplementary Fig.
6d–e). JAK3i thus provides a powerful tool for inactivating
JAK3 catalytic activity in an acute, selective, and graded manner. The C905S
JAK3 mutant, which is resistant to JAK3i, completes the chemical genetic toolkit
by enabling genetic rescue experiments to rigorously control for potential
off-target effects.
Figure 3
C905S JAK3 mutant rescues JAK3i effects in primary CD4+ T
cells
Rescue of JAK3i-mediated inhibition of (a) proliferation in unsorted CD4+
cells and (b) pSTAT5 (t = 15 min) in CD4+GFP+ cells.
Cells were retrovirally transduced with empty vector, WT JAK3, or C905S JAK3,
treated with JAK3i for 2 hrs, and stimulated with 50 units/mL rhIL-2. See Supplementary Fig. 6a for
transduction efficiency. (a) and (b) are representative of two independent
experiments. (c) Cellular selectivity of JAK3i in primary murine immune cells.
IFN-γ-stimulated pSTAT1 (JAK1/JAK2 dependent), measured by phosphoflow,
and IL-2-driven proliferation (JAK1/JAK3 dependent), measured by
3H-thymidine uptake, were assessed in CD4+ T-cell blasts.
T-cell receptor (TCR)-driven IL-2 production (ITK/RLK dependent) was assessed by
ELISA in naïve CD4+ T cells. Activation of naïve B cells
(BTK dependent) by B-cell receptor (BCR) stimulation (α-IgM) was
determined by FACS measurement of CD69 upregulation. Data are representative of
2 (IFN-γ, BCR), 9 (IL-2), or 3 (TCR) independent experiments. See Supplementary Table 4 for
IC50 values from all cellular selectivity experiments.
Proliferation (a, c) and IL-2 ELISA (c) data are plotted as mean ± SEM
of triplicates.
We obtained additional evidence supporting the selectivity of JAK3i from
cellular assays dependent on JAK or TEC-family kinases: IFN-γ-stimulated
STAT1 phosphorylation (JAK1 and JAK2), TCR-stimulated IL-2 production (ITK and
TXK/RLK[27]), and
BCR-stimulated CD69 expression (BTK). Consistent with the results from
biochemical kinase assays, JAK3i had no significant effect on these potentially
confounding pathways (IC50 > 1,100 nM, Fig. 3c, Supplementary Table 4) at concentrations that abolished
IL-2-driven proliferation and STAT5 phosphorylation (Fig. 2b and Fig.
3a,b).
Two waves of IL-2 signaling
The inability of JAK3i to inhibit STAT5 phosphorylation at
concentrations that blocked proliferation, CD25 induction, and IFN-γ
production was initially puzzling, since these processes are known to be
STAT5-dependent[5].
However, by monitoring the dynamics of STAT5 phosphorylation over 20 hours, we
discovered a second wave of signaling that, to our knowledge, has not been
characterized previously. STAT5 phosphorylation peaked initially at 15 minutes
and then declined to an intermediate level by one hour. In a majority of cells,
pSTAT5 intensity rapidly returned to the original peak level and remained at
this level for at least 10 hours (Fig.
4a,b). Signaling through the PI3K/mTOR pathway, while detected at early
time points, was most prominent 2–6 hours after stimulation (Supplementary Fig.
7).
Figure 4
A second wave of STAT5 signaling is highly sensitive to JAK3
inhibition
(a) CD4+ T-cell blasts were pretreated with inhibitors at the
EC90 dose for blocking T-cell proliferation (JAK3i 15 nM,
tofacitinib 50 nM) for 2 hrs and then stimulated with IL-2 (50 u/mL). pSTAT5 was
monitored by phosphoflow at the indicated times. (b) pSTAT5 time course from
(a), quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), normalized to the maximum
value (t = 15 min, DMSO) and plotted ± SEM of 10 independent
experiments. (c) Time course showing C905S JAK3 rescue of pSTAT5 inhibition by
JAK3i. (d–e) Cells were pretreated with JAK3i (30 nM) and stimulated
with IL-2. mRNA levels were monitored by qPCR at the indicated times. Plotted as
mean fold-induction with 95% confidence intervals. Data are
representative of 10 (a), 2 (c) or 3 (d–e) independent experiments.
Washout experiments have shown that continuous exposure to IL-2 over a
period at least 6 hours is required to drive T-cell blasts into S
phase[17]. Based on this
precedent and our observation of a second wave of signaling, we surmised that
JAK3 catalytic activity might be especially critical during the second wave,
potentially accounting for the potent effects of JAK3i on T-cell proliferation.
To test this, we treated cells with a concentration of JAK3i sufficient to block
IL-2-driven proliferation by 90% (EC90 15 nM) and monitored
pSTAT5 levels over time. Although it had little effect on the first wave, JAK3i
at 15 nM knocked down pSTAT5 and pS6 levels by >50% in a
sustained manner throughout the second wave (Fig.
4a,b, Supplementary
Fig. 7). As expected, this inhibitory effect was completely prevented
in cells expressing the JAK3i-resistant allele, C905S JAK3 (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 8). The pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib
had a completely different profile from JAK3i, reducing pSTAT5 to a similar
extent during the first and second waves when tested at its EC90 for
T-cell proliferation (50 nM). Importantly, the remaining levels of second-wave
pSTAT5 were nearly identical in cells treated with JAK3i and tofacitinib (Fig. 4a,b). Hence, with both JAK3i and
tofacitinib, a sustained yet partial reduction (>50%) in pSTAT5
levels during the second wave correlates with a nearly complete block in T-cell
proliferation. Moreover, this second wave of STAT5 phosphorylation is much more
sensitive to selective JAK3 inhibition than the first wave, whereas both waves
are equally sensitive to pan-JAK inhibition.To test whether the effects of JAK3i on pSTAT5 correlate with effects on
transcription, we analyzed a panel of STAT5-dependent genes implicated in T-cell
proliferation, survival, and cytokine production. Based on their temporal
expression patterns, these genes can be divided into three groups: first, a
biphasic pattern exemplified by Socs1 (a negative regulator of
JAK-STAT signaling) and Fos (Fig.
4d and Supplementary Fig. 9a); second, early and sustained induction,
exemplified by Myc and Ifng (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 9b); and third, delayed induction,
roughly coinciding with the second wave of pSTAT5 and exemplified by
Bcl2 and Il2ra (Supplementary Fig. 9c).
In all cases, pretreatment with JAK3i had little effect during the first
1–2 hours following IL-2 stimulation, yet profoundly reduced mRNA levels
at later time points, consistent with more potent effects on pSTAT5 during the
second wave.
The above results demonstrate a correlation between JAK3i’s
effects on late IL-2 signaling events and T-cell proliferation. To test directly
whether JAK3 inhibition during the second wave is sufficient to prevent cell
cycle progression, we added JAK3i to IL-2-stimulated cells after the initial
peak of pSTAT5 had subsided. Treatment with JAK3i at the onset of the second
wave induced rapid (within 30 min) and sustained reduction of both pSTAT5 and
pS6 levels, similar to pretreating cells before IL-2 stimulation (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 10a). Moreover, adding JAK3i with or 2
hours after IL-2 stimulation similarly inhibited S-phase entry (Fig. 5b), as assessed by labeling cells with
5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) for one hour at the onset of S phase (t
= 24 hrs, Supplementary Fig. 10b). Addition of 15 nM JAK3i at later time
points during the second wave led to a progressive increase in the fraction of
cells incorporating EdU. However, even an 8-hour delay in JAK3i treatment
prevented more than half the cells from entering S phase (Fig. 5b). Strikingly, late addition of 100 nM JAK3i, a
higher but still selective dose (Fig. 3),
up to 8 hours after IL-2 stimulation inhibited S-phase entry by 95%
(Fig. 5c); a minority of cells
(~30%) managed to escape when this higher dose was delayed for
12 hours. These experiments establish a minimal requirement of 8–12
hours of sustained JAK3 catalytic activity for T cells to progress from G1 to S
phase in response to IL-2.
Figure 5
Sustained JAK3 activity is required for S-phase entry
(a) pSTAT5 levels were monitored over time in T cells treated with JAK3i (15 nM)
either 2 hrs before or 90 min after IL-2 stimulation. Data are normalized the
maximum value (t=15 min DMSO) and plotted as mean ± SEM of 4
independent experiments. (b–c) JAK3i was added at a concentration of 15
nM (b) or 100 nM (d) at the indicated times after IL-2 stimulation. After 24
hrs, cells were labeled with EdU for 1 hr, and the percentage of EdU+
cells was measured by FACS and normalized to DMSO (± SEM of replicates,
n = 3). Typically, 35–45% of cells were in S-phase
24–25 hours after stimulation. (d) Cyclin D3 was monitored by immunoblot
24 hrs after IL-2 stimulation in the presence of indicated concentrations of
JAK3i. For full gel, see Supplementary Fig. 12. (e) Cells were pretreated with 15 nM JAK3i,
and cyclin E1 mRNA was quantified by qPCR at the indicated times after IL-2
stimulation. (f) T cells were treated with JAK3i 2 hrs before or 1.5 hrs after
IL-2 stimulation. After 24 hrs, phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein
(Rb) at S800/S804 was quantified by FACS. Original histograms are shown in Supplementary Figure 10d.
Data are representative of 4 (d), 3 (b, e) or 2 (c, f) independent
experiments.
Since treatment with low-dose JAK3i blocked proliferation without
inducing apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 10c), we next focused on the mechanism of the
observed G0/G1 arrest. In T cells, progression into S phase requires
phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) by CDK4/6 and CDK2
kinases[28]. IL-2
regulates these kinases, in part, via STAT5-mediated induction of cyclin D3 and
E1[28]. We asked whether
this pathway was particularly sensitive to JAK3 kinase inactivation. Indeed,
JAK3i potently blocked IL-2-stimulated induction of cyclin D3 (Fig. 5d) and cyclin E1 (Fig. 5e, detected by qPCR due to a lack of suitable antibodies).
Consistent with its effects on cyclin induction, JAK3i abolished Rb
phosphorylation at Ser800 and Ser804, assessed by flow cytometry 24 hours after
IL-2 stimulation. Importantly, pRb inhibition occurred with identical potency
whether JAK3i was added 2 hours before or 90 minutes after IL-2 stimulation
(Fig. 5f). Thus, JAK3 kinase activity
is required during a critical window – between 2 and 8 hours after IL-2
stimulation – to upregulate G1 and S-phase cyclins, which in turn
promote Rb hyperphosphorylation and DNA replication. It is likely that
additional JAK3- and STAT5-dependent processes (e.g. mTOR signaling, Supplementary Fig. 7,
Myc induction, Fig.
4e) contribute to timely cell cycle progression. Indeed, addition of the
PI3K inhibitor GDC0941 – even 12 hours after IL-2 stimulation –
prevented the majority of cells from entering S-phase, suggesting a similar
requirement for sustained PI3K activity in cell cycle progression (Supplementary Fig. 10e).
Thus, JAK3i’s antiproliferative effects likely reflect partial
suppression of both STAT5 and PI3K activities during this crucial second wave of
IL-2 signaling.
JAK3i blocks IL-2-driven T-cell proliferation in vivo
Whereas in vitro experiments enabled careful dissection
of JAK3-dependent signaling dynamics in primary T cells, the cells were
necessarily isolated from the milieu of cytokines, growth factors, and other
cell types that contribute to T-cell functions in vivo. To test
whether JAK3 activity is required for IL-2 proliferation in this environment and
assess the utility of JAK3i as an in vivo tool compound, we
devised a proliferation assay similar to our in vitro system using adoptively
transferred T-cell blasts. Ex vivo-activated CD4+
T-cell blasts were labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and
injected into congenically marked (CD45.1+) hosts. The mice were then
dosed with JAK3i twice daily and stimulated over two days with thrice-daily
injections of IL-2 (Fig. 6a). Cell division
was monitored by CFSE dilution 50 hours after the first IL-2 injection, which
yielded 2–4 divisions for most cells in the control mice (Fig. 6b). JAK3i strongly inhibited T-cell
proliferation in vivo, with a nearly complete block at 40 mg/kg
and substantial reduction at 10 mg/kg (Fig.
6c).
Figure 6
JAK3 inhibition blocks IL-2-driven proliferation in
vivo
(a) Experimental timeline, showing adoptive transfer of CD4+ T-cell
blasts (5 × 106) labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl
ester (CFSE), twice-daily dosing with JAK3i, and thrice-daily injections of IL-2
(20,000 units). (b) Representative CFSE dilution histograms for the indicated
treatments. (c) Median CFSE intensity (plotted ± SEM for n>2)
for the indicated treatments, 2–3 mice per group as indicated. (d)
Congenic marking and transfer scheme for in vivo proliferation
and rescue experiment. A 1:1 mixture of WT and C905S T-cells (total 5 ×
106) was transferred to each mouse. (e) FACS identification of WT
and C905S JAK3-transduced cells from the same mouse (see complete gating in
Supplementary Figure
11). (f) Representative Celltrace Violet dilution profiles. Each
column depicts cells from the same mouse. (g) Median Celltrace Violet intensity
for the indicated treatments and JAK3 overexpression construct (n = 3
mice per IL-2-stimulated treatment condition, n = 1 mouse for the
unstimulated control). Data in a-c are pooled from two independenet experiments
and data in d-g are from one experiment with indicated numbers of mice.
To rule out off-target effects, we developed an assay that allowed the
simultaneous assessment of T cells expressing either WT or C905S JAK3 in the
same mouse (Fig. 6d). Two congenic markers
were used to distinguish host cells (CD45.1/CD90.2) from donor cells transduced
ex vivo with WT JAK3 (CD45.2/CD90.2) or C905S JAK3
(CD45.2/CD90.1) (Fig. 6e). Upon IL-2
stimulation as described above, T cells transduced with WT or C905S JAK3
proliferated to the same extent in vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 6f,g). By contrast, in mice dosed with JAK3i,
T-cells expressing WT JAK3 failed to proliferate, whereas T-cells expressing
C905S JAK3 proliferated normally in the exact same animals. These results
strongly implicate JAK3 as the relevant in vivo target of
JAK3i, even at relatively high doses (40 mg/kg, twice daily).
Discussion
In this study, we elucidated a previously unknown requirement for JAK3
catalytic activity in sustaining a second wave of STAT5 phosphorylation in
IL-2-stimulated CD4+ T cells. Although JAK3 activity is also required for
the initial wave of pSTAT5 that peaks within 15 minutes of IL-2 stimulation, the
second, more prolonged wave shows greater sensitivity to acute inhibition by JAK3i.
This increased sensitivity accounts for the potent effects of JAK3i on
STAT5-dependent processes occurring many hours after IL-2 stimulation, which include
transcriptional activation of genes required for cell cycle progression. Sustained
activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway was also more sensitive to JAK3i and essential
for cell cycle progression, suggesting a general requirement for second-wave JAK3
activity in multiple signaling pathways downstream of the IL-2 receptor.What determines this biphasic pattern of STAT5 phosphorylation? In
IL-6-stimulated macrophages, STAT3 phosphorylation shows a similar biphasic pattern.
Here, the initial decrease in pSTAT3 is ablated in cells lacking the Suppressor of
Cytokine Signaling-3 (Socs3)[29]. Based on this precedent, we speculate that induction of
one or more SOCS proteins could promote the rapid decrease in pSTAT5 that occurs
within one hour of IL-2 stimulation (Fig. 4).
The SOCS-family genes, Socs1, Socs3, and Cish, are
all transcriptionally induced by IL-2[5]. Moreover, Socs1-deficient T-cells are
hyper-responsive to IL-2 at the level of both STAT5 phosphorylation and
proliferation[30]. Finally,
in IL-2-stimulated T cells lacking Cish, the temporal pattern of
STAT5 phosphorylation and dephosphorylation is altered[31]. Hence, SOCS-family proteins likely play
complex and partially overlapping roles in tuning the dynamics of IL-2 signaling.
Induction of SOCS1 or SOCS3 is expected to shift the balance of JAK kinase
dependency toward JAK3, since both proteins bind and directly inhibit JAK1 but not
JAK3 kinase domains[32]. Induction
of SOCS1 or SOCS3 could therefore lead to diminished JAK1 activity during the second
wave, and hence, a greater reliance on JAK3 activity.High levels of pSTAT5 were sustained for at least 12 hours after IL-2
stimulation, suggesting that acute JAK3 inhibition during the second wave might be
sufficient to block IL-2-stimulated T-cell proliferation. Consistent with this
prediction, delayed addition of 100 nM JAK3i 8 hours after IL-2 stimulation
completely prevented almost all cells from entering S phase. In patients,
tofacitinib inhibits JAK1/3 activity for less than half the time between each dose
and yet still exerts a clinically beneficial effect[33]. Extrapolating from our in vitro studies,
tofacitinib may work by preventing the sustained activation of STATs required for
committed cellular responses. An inhibitor that selectively blocks JAK3 activity for
short periods of time may show similar efficacy to pan-JAK or JAK1-selective
inhibitors, but without the side effects resulting from inhibition of
JAK1/2-dependent cytokines.The combination of JAK3i and the C905S JAK3 mutant provides a powerful
toolkit to decipher the function of JAK3. Tofacitinib sensitivity is often cited as
evidence for JAK3 dependence (see, for example, recent work on alopecia
areata[34]). However, many
of tofacitinib’s effects result from blockade of JAK3-independent
cytokines[35]. It remains
unclear whether blocking γc cytokines is sufficient to achieve
therapeutic efficacy in the setting of autoimmune disease, or whether it is instead
necessary to block additional cytokines (e.g., IL-6), as observed with tofacitinib.
Together with the inhibitor-resistant C905S JAK3 mutant, JAK3i will enable future
preclinical studies to address this important question.
Online Methods
Mice
C57BL/6J mice,
B6.Cg-Gpi1aThy1aIgha/J
and B6.SJL-Ptprc/BoyJ (Jackson)
used in this study were housed in the specific pathogen–free facilities
at the University of California, San Francisco, and were treated according to
protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in
accordance with US National Institutes of Health guidelines. Both male and
female mice were used as a source of primary CD4+ T-cells, all aged
6–12 weeks.
Reagents
pan-Jak inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550), MEK inhibitor PD0325901 and
AKT inhibitor MK2206 were purchased from Selleck Chemicals and MEK inhibitor
U0126 was purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies. JAK3i 1 and
inactive analogue 2 were synthesized as described in the Supplementary Note.
pan-PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 and mTOR inhibitor INK128 were a gift of K. Shokat
(UCSF). Recombinant human IL-2 was from the NIH AIDS Reagent Program, Division
of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH: Maurice
Gately (Hoffmann-La Roche). Recombinant mouse IFN-γ was a gift of R.
Locksley.
In vitro kinase assays
Purified JAK1 (9.4 nM), JAK2 (1.15 nM) or JAK3 (3.13 nM) kinase (all
Invitrogen) were preincubated with compound and 100 μM ATP for 30
minutes in manufacturer prescribed buffer. Reactions were run for 30 minutes at
23 °C with γ-32P ATP (16.7 nM, Perkin Elmer) and the
appropriate substrate: JAK1 - IRS1 (0.06 mg/mL, Enzo Life Sciences); JAK2 -
PDKTide (0.19 mg/mL, EMD Millipore); JAK3 - JAK3tide (0.0325 mg/mL,
EMD-Millipore). ITK (3.13 nM, Invitrogen) was performed similarly except using 1
mM ATP and Myelin Basic Protein substrate (Sigma). Kinase assays with BTK, EGFR,
JAK3 (all with 1 mM ATP), and TYK2 (100 μM ATP) were performed by
Nanosyn.
Primary T-Cell Culture
T cells were purified from single-cell suspensions of spleen and lymph
nodes from male and female mice aged 6–12 weeks by negative selection
with biotinylated antibodies (CD8, CD19, B220, CD11b, CD11c, DX5, Ter119 and
CD24, UCSF Monoclonal Antibody Core) and magnetic anti-Biotin beads (MACSi
Beads, Miltenyi Biotec). For IL-2 stimulation, purified T cells were
pre-activated on 96-well plates coated with anti-CD3 (2C11) and anti-CD28
(37.51) for 72 hours, removed and cultured with rhIL-2 (100 u/mL, Roche) for 36
hours, and then cultured without rhIL-2 for the 36 hours prior to all
experiments.
T-Cell Proliferation
Pre-activated T cells were cultured in 96-well plates with titrations of
inhibitor or DMSO (0.1%) for 2 hours prior to stimulation with rhIL-2
(50 u/mL). After 18 hours, cells were pulsed with
[Methyl-3H]-thymidine (1 μCi/well, Perkin
Elmer) and incubated for 24 hours. Cells were harvested onto glass fiber
filtermats, dried, and counted on a Microbeta 1450 Trilux Liquid Scintillation
Counter (Wallac). Alternatively, T cells were grown in 24-well plates for
10–30 hours and pulsed with 10 μM
5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine for 1 hour and assayed per the
manufacturer’s procedure (Click-IT Plus EdU, Life Technologies).
IFN-γ production
CD4+ T cells, purified and pre-activated as described above,
were cultured in 96-well plates with titrations of inhibitor or DMSO for 2 hours
and then stimulated with rhIL-2 (50 u/mL). After 24 hours, the plate was spun
down and the media was carefully removed. Media was diluted 1:1 in assay diluent
and assayed for IFN-γ content as per the manufacture’s procedure
(BD OptEIA Set Mouse IFN-γ, Cat# 555138).
Cellular Selectivity
ITK and RLK inhibition:IL-2 production was assessed by culturing
purified naive CD4+ T cells on anti-CD3 anti-CD28-coated 96-well plates
in the presence of inhibitors and measuring IL-2 in the media after 24 hours by
ELISA (BD OptEIA Mouse IL-2 ELISA Set #555148). JAK1/JAK2: CD4+
T-cell blasts prepared as above were stimulated with 100 u/mL IFN-γ for
30 minutes, fixed and analyzed by FACS as described below. BTK: Freshly isolated
mouse splenocytes were stimulated and assayed for CD69 expression as previously
described[33].
Flow Cytometry
Cells were live/dead stained using the Live/Dead Fixable Near IR Dead
Cell Stain Kit (Life Technologies). For surface stains, cells were stained for
30 minutes on ice with indicated antibodies. Clones, sources & dilutions
can be found in the Supplementary Table 5. For intracellular stains, samples were fixed
at the indicated time after stimulation in 2% paraformaldehyde, surface
stained with CD25-biotin and CD4-BUV395, fixed again and permeabilized with ice
cold 90% methanol at −20 °C overnight. Samples were then
barcoded using Pacific Orange-NHS ester (0.33 or 5 μg/mL), Pacific
Blue-NHS Ester (0.67 or 10 μg/mL), and AlexaFluor (AF) 488-NHS Ester
(0.26 or 2 μg/mL) (Life Technologies), as previously described[36]. Intracellular antigens were
then stained for 30 minutes at 23 °C with antibodies indicated in Supplementary Table 5.
Samples were acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa and analyzed in FlowJo (Tree
Star).
Apoptosis Assay
CD4+ T-cells, pre-activated and rested as described above, were
initially stained with Live/Dead Fixable Near IR (Life Tech) to identify any
dead cells at beginning of the assay, and then cultured with either 15 or 100 nM
JAK3i in the presence of 50 u/mL IL-2 for 24 hours. Cells were then stained with
Annexin V FITC and PI as per manufacture’s protocol (BD) and acquired on
a BD LSR Fortessa. Using FlowJo (Tree Star), results were first gated on cells
that were live at the beginning of the assay (~90%) and then as
live (Annexin V−PI−), undergoing apoptosis (Annexin
V+PI−) or dead (Annexin V+PI+). These gates were
determined by reference to cells cultured in PBS or in media without IL-2 for 24
hours.
Retroviral Overexpression
Murine JAK3 (plasmid provided by L. Berg) was cloned into a pMIG-derived
vector (MSCV-IRES-GFP) via Gibson cloning and the C905S mutant was generated by
site-directed mutagenesis. Retrovirus was generated in Phoenix cells
co-transfected with pCL-Eco. CD4+ T-cells were isolated and activated as
described above. After 24 hours of T-cell receptor stimulation, cells were spin
transduced for 1 hr with fresh viral supernatant in the presence of
Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) and 100 u/mL rhIL-2. Cells were left on
coated plates for 48 hours and then expanded and rested as described above.
Transduction efficiency was >75% and cells were used unsorted
for proliferation assays. In CD25 and pSTAT5 assays, cells were gated on GFP
expression.
qPCR
RNA was isolated from 1–2 × 106 CD4+
T-cell blasts per condition using RNAeasy kit (Qiagen) and cDNA was synthesized
using qScript (Quanta Biosciences). mRNA was detected by Primetime (IDT) or
Taqman (Life Technologies) predesigned qPCR assays. Primer & probe
sequences can be found in Supplementary Table 6. Data are from 3 replicates collected on a
QuantStudio 12k (Life Technologies), plotted with 95% confidence
intervals as calculated by Quantstudio (Life Technologies).
Western Blots
5–10 × 106 cells were lysed in 50 μL
RIPA buffer with 500 mM NaCl, clarified, and protein normalized by bicinchoninic
acid assay (Pierce). Proteins (20–30 μg) were resolved by
7.5% or 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride
membrane and blocked with Odyssey Block (LI-COR Biosciences). Blots were probed
for Cyclin D3 (DCS22, 1:1000) or JAK3 (D7B12, 1:1000) (Cell Signaling
Technologies), normalized to tubulin (DM1A, 1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich) and detected
with fluorescent secondary antibodies on an Odyssey Scanner (LI-COR
Biosciences). Alternatively, blots were probed with HRP-linked goat-anti-rabbit
secondary (Southern Biotech, Birmingham AL), developed with Western Lightening
Plus ECL (Pierce) and detected on a ChemiDocMP (Biorad).
In vivo proliferation
Prior to transfer, mice were marked by ear punch, assigned a number and
then randomized to treatment group without blinding. Pilot experiments
demonstrated that the effect size was large enough to use 2 mice per dose group.
CD4+ T-cell blasts from C57BL/6J mice were labeled with
carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE, Life Technologies), and 5
× 106 cells were adoptively transferred into 8-week old
B6.SJL-Ptprc/BoyJ male
mice via lateral tail vein injection. After 12 hours, mice were treated with
JAK3i or vehicle by intraperitoneal injection twice a day and stimulated 3 times
a day with 20,000 units rhIL-2 IP for 2 days. On day 3, mice were sacrificed,
spleens isolated, and proliferation of adoptively transferred cells was assessed
by FACS as described above. For in vivo proliferation with cells overexpressing
either WT or C905S JAK3, isolated CD4+ T cells from C57BL/6J were
transduced with WT JAK3 and CD4+ T-cells from
B6.Cg-Gpi1aThy1aIgha/J
mice were transduced with C950S JAK3, then mixed 1:1 and labeled with Celltrace
Violet (Life Technologies) prior to transfer of 5 × 106 cells
(2.5 × 106 each of WT and C905S) into 8-week old
B6.SJL-Ptprc/BoyJ male
mice via lateral tail vein injection. Mice were treated with vehicle +
IL-2 (3) or JAK3i + IL-2 (3) or vehicle only (1) and proliferation
assessed as described above.
Statistical Analysis
Prism (Graphpad Software) was used to calculate mean and standard error
of the mean for all graphs except qPCR data. Relative gene expression is plotted
as mean with 95% confidence intervals calculated by Quantstudio
software.
Authors: Zhengju Yao; Yongzhi Cui; Wendy T Watford; Jay H Bream; Kunihiro Yamaoka; Bruce D Hissong; Denise Li; Scott K Durum; Qiong Jiang; Avinash Bhandoola; Lothar Hennighausen; John J O'Shea Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: E M Schaeffer; J Debnath; G Yap; D McVicar; X C Liao; D R Littman; A Sher; H E Varmus; M J Lenardo; P L Schwartzberg Journal: Science Date: 1999-04-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: T Miyazaki; A Kawahara; H Fujii; Y Nakagawa; Y Minami; Z J Liu; I Oishi; O Silvennoinen; B A Witthuhn; J N Ihle Journal: Science Date: 1994-11-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Samuel Wormald; Jian-Guo Zhang; Danielle L Krebs; Lisa A Mielke; Jeremy Silver; Warren S Alexander; Terence P Speed; Nicos A Nicola; Douglas J Hilton Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2006-02-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: John R Horton; Clayton B Woodcock; Qin Chen; Xu Liu; Xing Zhang; John Shanks; Ganesha Rai; Bryan T Mott; Daniel J Jansen; Stephen C Kales; Mark J Henderson; Matthew Cyr; Katherine Pohida; Xin Hu; Pranav Shah; Xin Xu; Ajit Jadhav; David J Maloney; Matthew D Hall; Anton Simeonov; Haian Fu; Paula M Vertino; Xiaodong Cheng Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Byron B Au-Yeung; Geoffrey Alexander Smith; James L Mueller; Cheryl S Heyn; Rebecca Garrett Jaszczak; Arthur Weiss; Julie Zikherman Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Kathryn G Roberts; Yung-Li Yang; Debbie Payne-Turner; Wenwei Lin; Jacob K Files; Kirsten Dickerson; Zhaohui Gu; Jack Taunton; Laura J Janke; Taosheng Chen; Mignon L Loh; Stephen P Hunger; Charles G Mullighan Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2017-08-30