A Jaju1,2, E I Hwang3, M Kool4, D Capper5, L Chavez6, S Brabetz4, C Billups7, Y Li7, M Fouladi8, R J Packer3, S M Pfister4, J M Olson9, L A Heier10. 1. From the Department of Radiology (A.J.), Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois ajaju@luriechildrens.org. 2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (A.J.), Chicago, Illinois. 3. Brain Tumor Institute (E.I.H., R.J.P.), Children's National Health System, Washington, DC. 4. Department of Pediatric Neurooncology (M.K., S.B., S.M.P.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. 5. Department of Pediatric Neuropathology (D.C.), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. 6. Department of Medicine (L.C.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. 7. Department of Biostatistics (C.B., Y.L.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 8. Brain Tumor Center (M.F.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. 9. Fred Hurtchinson Cancer Research Center (J.M.O.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington. 10. Department of Radiology (L.A.H.), New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors and pineoblastomas have traditionally been grouped together for treatment purposes. Molecular profiling of these tumors has revealed a number of distinct entities and has led to the term "CNS-primitive neuroectodermal tumors" being removed from the 2016 World Health Organization classification. The purpose of this study was to describe the MR imaging findings of histologically diagnosed primitive neuroectodermal tumors and pineoblastomas and correlate them with molecular diagnoses and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histologically diagnosed primitive neuroectodermal tumors and pineoblastomas were enrolled in this Children's Oncology Group Phase III trial, and molecular classification was retrospectively completed using DNA methylation profiling. MR imaging features were systematically studied and correlated with molecular diagnoses and survival. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients enrolled, 56 met the inclusion criteria, in whom 28 tumors were in pineal and 28 in nonpineal locations. Methylation profiling revealed a variety of diagnoses, including pineoblastomas (n = 27), high-grade gliomas (n = 17), embryonal tumors (n = 7), atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (n = 3), and ependymomas (n = 2). Thus, 39% overall and 71% of nonpineal tumor diagnoses were discrepant with histopathology. Tumor location, size, margins, and edema were predictors of embryonal-versus-nonembryonal tumors. Larger size and ill-defined margins correlated with poor event-free survival, while metastatic disease by MR imaging did not. CONCLUSIONS: In nonpineal locations, only a minority of histologically diagnosed primitive neuroectodermal tumors are embryonal tumors; therefore, high-grade glioma or ependymoma should be high on the radiographic differential. An understanding of molecularly defined tumor entities and their relative frequencies and locations will help the radiologist make more accurate predictions of the tumor types.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors and pineoblastomas have traditionally been grouped together for treatment purposes. Molecular profiling of these tumors has revealed a number of distinct entities and has led to the term "CNS-primitive neuroectodermal tumors" being removed from the 2016 World Health Organization classification. The purpose of this study was to describe the MR imaging findings of histologically diagnosed primitive neuroectodermal tumors and pineoblastomas and correlate them with molecular diagnoses and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histologically diagnosed primitive neuroectodermal tumors and pineoblastomas were enrolled in this Children's Oncology Group Phase III trial, and molecular classification was retrospectively completed using DNA methylation profiling. MR imaging features were systematically studied and correlated with molecular diagnoses and survival. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients enrolled, 56 met the inclusion criteria, in whom 28 tumors were in pineal and 28 in nonpineal locations. Methylation profiling revealed a variety of diagnoses, including pineoblastomas (n = 27), high-grade gliomas (n = 17), embryonal tumors (n = 7), atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (n = 3), and ependymomas (n = 2). Thus, 39% overall and 71% of nonpineal tumor diagnoses were discrepant with histopathology. Tumor location, size, margins, and edema were predictors of embryonal-versus-nonembryonal tumors. Larger size and ill-defined margins correlated with poor event-free survival, while metastatic disease by MR imaging did not. CONCLUSIONS: In nonpineal locations, only a minority of histologically diagnosed primitive neuroectodermal tumors are embryonal tumors; therefore, high-grade glioma or ependymoma should be high on the radiographic differential. An understanding of molecularly defined tumor entities and their relative frequencies and locations will help the radiologist make more accurate predictions of the tumor types.
Authors: Martin J Aryee; Andrew E Jaffe; Hector Corrada-Bravo; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Andrew P Feinberg; Kasper D Hansen; Rafael A Irizarry Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Dominik Sturm; Brent A Orr; Umut H Toprak; Volker Hovestadt; David T W Jones; David Capper; Martin Sill; Ivo Buchhalter; Paul A Northcott; Irina Leis; Marina Ryzhova; Christian Koelsche; Elke Pfaff; Sariah J Allen; Gnanaprakash Balasubramanian; Barbara C Worst; Kristian W Pajtler; Sebastian Brabetz; Pascal D Johann; Felix Sahm; Jüri Reimand; Alan Mackay; Diana M Carvalho; Marc Remke; Joanna J Phillips; Arie Perry; Cynthia Cowdrey; Rachid Drissi; Maryam Fouladi; Felice Giangaspero; Maria Łastowska; Wiesława Grajkowska; Wolfram Scheurlen; Torsten Pietsch; Christian Hagel; Johannes Gojo; Daniela Lötsch; Walter Berger; Irene Slavc; Christine Haberler; Anne Jouvet; Stefan Holm; Silvia Hofer; Marco Prinz; Catherine Keohane; Iris Fried; Christian Mawrin; David Scheie; Bret C Mobley; Matthew J Schniederjan; Mariarita Santi; Anna M Buccoliero; Sonika Dahiya; Christof M Kramm; André O von Bueren; Katja von Hoff; Stefan Rutkowski; Christel Herold-Mende; Michael C Frühwald; Till Milde; Martin Hasselblatt; Pieter Wesseling; Jochen Rößler; Ulrich Schüller; Martin Ebinger; Jens Schittenhelm; Stephan Frank; Rainer Grobholz; Istvan Vajtai; Volkmar Hans; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Karel Zitterbart; V Peter Collins; Eleonora Aronica; Pascale Varlet; Stephanie Puget; Christelle Dufour; Jacques Grill; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Marietta Wolter; Martin U Schuhmann; Tarek Shalaby; Michael Grotzer; Timothy van Meter; Camelia-Maria Monoranu; Jörg Felsberg; Guido Reifenberger; Matija Snuderl; Lynn Ann Forrester; Jan Koster; Rogier Versteeg; Richard Volckmann; Peter van Sluis; Stephan Wolf; Tom Mikkelsen; Amar Gajjar; Kenneth Aldape; Andrew S Moore; Michael D Taylor; Chris Jones; Nada Jabado; Matthias A Karajannis; Roland Eils; Matthias Schlesner; Peter Lichter; Andreas von Deimling; Stefan M Pfister; David W Ellison; Andrey Korshunov; Marcel Kool Journal: Cell Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Regina I Jakacki; Peter C Burger; Mehmet Kocak; James M Boyett; Joel Goldwein; Minesh Mehta; Roger J Packer; Nancy J Tarbell; Ian F Pollack Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Vijay Ramaswamy; Marc Remke; Eric Bouffet; Simon Bailey; Steven C Clifford; Francois Doz; Marcel Kool; Christelle Dufour; Gilles Vassal; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Katja von Hoff; Torsten Pietsch; Paul A Northcott; Amar Gajjar; Giles W Robinson; Laetitia Padovani; Nicolas André; Maura Massimino; Barry Pizer; Roger Packer; Stefan Rutkowski; Stefan M Pfister; Michael D Taylor; Scott L Pomeroy Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: M Zhang; L Tam; J Wright; M Mohammadzadeh; M Han; E Chen; M Wagner; J Nemalka; H Lai; A Eghbal; C Y Ho; R M Lober; S H Cheshier; N A Vitanza; G A Grant; L M Prolo; K W Yeom; A Jaju Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Benesch; T Perwein; G Apfaltrer; T Langer; A Neumann; I B Brecht; M U Schuhmann; H Cario; M C Frühwald; K Vollert; M van Buiren; M Y Deng; A Seitz; C Haberler; M Mynarek; C Kramm; F Sahm; P A Robe; J W Dankbaar; K V Hoff; M Warmuth-Metz; B Bison Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 4.966